Cited by 22Skin Diseases and DiabetesSkin Protection and AgingNatural Antidiabetic Agents Studies

Oral and Topical Centella asiatica in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients with Dry Skin: A Three‐Arm Prospective Randomized Double‐Blind Controlled Trial

Open access
Legiawati, Lili, Bramono, Kusmarinah, Indriatmi, Wresti, Yunir, Em, Setiati, Siti, Jusman, Sri Widia A., Purwaningsih, Erni H., Wibowo, Heri +1 more·2020·Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Abstract

Introduction. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM) is related to skin disorders, particularly dry skin. Pathogenesis of dry skin in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) rises from the chronic hyperglycemia causing an increase in advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), proinflammatory cytokines, and oxidative stress. Combination of oral and topical Centella asiatica (CA) is expected to treat dry skin in T2DM patients more effectively through decreasing N(6)‐carboxymethyl‐lysine (CML) and interleukin‐1α (IL‐1α) and increasing superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity. Methods. A three‐arm prospective, double‐blind, randomized, controlled study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of the oral and topical CA extract in 159 T2DM patients with dry skin. The subjects were divided into the CA oral (CAo) 2 × 1.100 mg + CA topical (CAt) 1% ointment group, oral placebo (Plo) + CAt group, and Plo and topical placebo (Plt) group. Dry skin assessment was performed on day 1, 15, and 29, while evaluation of CML, IL‐1α, and SOD activity was on day 1 and 29. Result. Effectivity of CAo + CAt combination was assessed based on HbA1c and random blood glucose (RBG). In well‐controlled blood glucose, on day 29, the percentage of SRRC decrement was greater in the CAo + CAt group compared to the control group (p = 0.04). SCap value in the CAo + CAt group was greater than that in the control group (p = 0.01). In the partially controlled blood glucose, increment of SOD activity in the CAo + CAt group was greater than that in the control group (p = 0.01). There were medium‐to‐strong correlation between CML with SOD (r = 0.58, p < 0.05) and IL‐1α with SOD (r = 0.70, p < 0.05) in well‐controlled blood glucose. Systemic and topical adverse events were not significantly different between groups. Conclusion. CAo and CAt combination can be used to significantly improve dry skin condition through increasing SOD activity in T2DM patients with controlled blood glucose.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2020/7253560

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing human intervention studies of oral Centella asiatica have often been constrained by small sample sizes, short intervention periods, or subjective outcome measures.

    “While Centella asiatica has been extensively studied in topical formulations, randomized controlled trials evaluating oral supplementation remain limited, and existing human intervention studies have often been constrained by small sample sizes, short intervention periods, or subjective outcome measures [25,30,31,32].”

    From A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Assessing the Effects of Oral Centella asiatica Extract on Skin Aging-Related Parameters in Middle-Aged Korean Women. (2026) · cites this paper as [30]

    This paper is a randomized human trial of oral Centella asiatica, so it supports the existence of such intervention research. The Results (§3.1) report 159 randomized patients, and Outcomes and Measurements (§2.7) describe assessments through day 29, including subjective scales but also instrument-based and laboratory measures. It does not establish that oral trials generally are limited or that existing studies have often had small samples or relied on subjective outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Legiawati et al. reported that combined oral and topical administration of C. asiatica improved skin hydration and reduced pro-aging markers in patients with type 2 diabetes and dry skin.

    “Legiawati et al. [24] reported that combined oral and topical administration of C. asiatica improved skin hydration and reduced pro-aging markers in patients with type 2 diabetes and dry skin.”

    From Oral Centella asiatica Extract Attenuates UVB-Induced Skin Photoaging via Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Extracellular Matrix-Preserving Effects in Hairless Mice (2025) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Abstract’s Results report higher skin capacitance, a measure of hydration, with combined oral and topical Centella asiatica than with control in patients with well-controlled blood glucose. But Results §§3.3–3.4 report that CML and IL-1α were not reduced relative to the other groups; CML increased in the combination group. The claim’s reduction of pro-aging markers is therefore not supported. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]Putta S. Kilari E. K. A review on methods of estimation of advanced glycation end products World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2015 4 9 689 699
  2. [24]Doddigarla Z. Parwez I. Ahmad J. Correlation of serum chromium, zinc, magnesium and SOD levels with HbA1c in type 2 diabetes: a cross sectional analysis Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews 2016 10 1 S126 S129 10.1016/j.dsx.2015.10.008 2-s2.0-85015388293 26589776 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Legiawati, L., Bramono, K., Indriatmi, W., Yunir, E., Setiati, S., Jusman, S. W. A., Purwaningsih, E. H., Wibowo, H., & Danarti, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Indonesia (ID)
  • Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Corresponding author
Legiawati, Lili
Venue
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-01
Volume
2020
Issue
1
Pages
7253560-7253560
ISSN
  • 1741-427X (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-4288
OpenAlex
W3080167032
Cited by
22
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Universitas Indonesia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Diseases and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
Keywords
Centella asiatica, type 2 diabetes, dry skin, advanced glycation end products, interleukin-1 alpha, superoxide dismutase, oxidative stress, glycemic control, HbA1c, skin hydration, anti-inflammatory activity, adverse events

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review