CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 114Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnzyme-mediated dye degradationCoagulation and Flocculation Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phycoremediation of Synthetic Dyes: An Effective and Eco-Friendly Algal Technology for the Dye Abatement

Open access
Ayele, Abate, Getachew, Deribe, Kamaraj, M., Suresh, A.·2021·Journal of Chemistry
DOI 10.1155/2021/9923643
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Rapid industrialization leads to serious environmental hazards due to the increase in the release of pollutants into the environment. Industries that use synthetic dyes for different applications are a predominant source for dye contaminants by releasing the dye in wastewater with pretreatment or without treatment directly into the water bodies, making serious water pollution in the environment. Therefore, it is imperative to safeguard the environment from such contaminants and their associated negative impacts. The conventional treatment method that is used to treat dye-contaminated wastewater is generally costly and has a possibility to produce secondary metabolites. Due to the above problems, the biological method is preferable to treat effluent or dye-contaminated wastewater. Phycoremediation is an algae-based eco-friendly dye abatement technique from contaminated environments. This review highlights the phycoremediation of dyes and its underlying mechanisms along with the information on synthetic dyes, classification, hazardous effects, and other major techniques of dye abatement. This review provides a comprehensive insight into several influencing factors such as pH, temperature, contact time, the dose of algae biomass, and agitation speed, as well as functional groups involved in the phycoremediation process.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2021/9923643

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Traditional chemical, physicochemical, and biological methods for dye removal have limitations including ineffective dye removal, sludge production, short O3 half-life, byproduct generation, aromatic amine discharge, high electricity costs, ineffectiveness against dispersing and vat dyes, and secondary pollution from chemical use.

    “Numerous limitations have been identified with all of the methods mentioned above, including ineffective dye removal, sludge production, a short O3 half-life (20 min), the generation of byproducts, the discharge of aromatic amines, high electricity costs, ineffective against dispersing and vat dyes, and repetitive or frequent chemical use resulting in secondary pollution problems [127].”

    From Microalgae-based wastewater treatment: Mechanisms, challenges, recent advances, and future prospects (2023) · cites this paper as [127]

  • Contact time, pH, temperature, initial dye concentration, and adsorbent dosage are critical variables for dye removal by microalgae.

    “Numerous variables are critical for dye removal, including contact time, pH, temperature, initial dye concentration, and adsorbent dosage.”

    From Microalgae-based wastewater treatment: Mechanisms, challenges, recent advances, and future prospects (2023) · cites this paper as [127]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 114

  1. H. N. Brahmbhatt, 2016, The role of algae in bioremediation of textile effluent, International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science, 4, 2091
  2. F. D. Chequer, 2013, Textile dyes: dyeing process and environmental impact, Eco-friendly Textile Dyeing and Finishing, 6, 151
  3. 10.1007/s13201-013-0117-y · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1088/1755-1315/251/1/012012 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/10643380091184237 · DOI · Paper page
  6. M. A. Hassaan, 2017, Health and environmental impacts of dyes: mini review, American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 1, 64
  7. 10.1016/j.ejar.2014.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.9734/jamb/2017/37322 · DOI
  9. A. Admasu, 2008, Adsorptive Removal of Reactive Azo Dyes Using Industrial Residue
  10. 10.1039/c4ra16959j · DOI · Paper page
  11. T. Robinson, 2001, Remediation of dyes in textile effluent: a critical review on current treatment technologies with a proposed alternative, Bioresource Technology, 77, 247, 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00080-8 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.5937/savteh1601081m · DOI
  13. 10.1080/10643380903218376 · DOI
  14. M. P. Shah, 2018, Azo dye removal technologies, Advances in Research and Applications, 5, 1090
  15. Textile Learners Report, 2018, Types of Dyes and Their Properties
  16. 10.21474/ijar01/458 · DOI
  17. 10.26643/tjg.v8i8.8102 · DOI
  18. P. Jadhav, 2019, Isolation of Methylene Blue dye degrading bacteria from effluent, screening and evaluation of their dye decolorization activity, International Journal of Scientific Development and Research, 4, 224
  19. 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.09.012 · DOI
  20. 10.1515/nbec-2016-0010 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.19045/bspab.2020.90251 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.jksus.2015.05.009 · DOI
  23. S. El Harfi, 2017, Classifications, properties and applications of textile dyes: a review, Applied Journal of Environmental Engineering Science, 3
  24. H. I. R. Zhao, 2005, Biodegradation of a model azo disperse dye by the white-rot fungus Pleurotus ostreatus, Journal of International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 57, 1, 10.1016/j.ibiod.2005.10.008 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/clen.200900295 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.09.006 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.08.020 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/10643389.2017.1393263 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03271 · DOI
  30. L. Robert, 2008, Fisher’s Contact Dermatitis in Textiles and Shoes, 339
  31. 10.3923/pjbs.2008.1310.1316 · DOI
  32. R. D. Saini, 2017, Textile organic dyes: polluting effects and elimination methods from textile waste water, International Journal of Chemical Engineering Research, 9, 121
  33. 10.1016/j.biori.2019.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  34. R. M. Moattari, 2021, Hybrid adsorbents for dye removal from wastewater, 10.1007/978-3-030-47400-3_16 · DOI
  35. R. Deokar, 2014, Biosorption of methylene blue and malachite green from binary solution onto Ulva Lactuca, International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 3, 295
  36. 10.3126/ijasbt.v5i2.16881 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.12.014 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/9781119526599.ch2 · DOI
  39. P. Dwivedi, 2018, Bioremediation of textile effluent for degradation and decolourization of synthetic dyes: a review, International Journal of Current Research in Life Sciences, 7, 1948
  40. 10.1080/21655979.2018.1472465 · DOI
  41. V. K. Gupta, 2015, Decolorization of mixture of dyes: a critical review, Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 1, 71
  42. P. Kalyani, 2016, Degradation of toxic dyes-a review, International Journal of Pure & Applied Bioscience, 4, 81, 10.18782/2320-7051.2400 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.03.007 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/s41101-016-0003-1 · DOI
  45. K. Preeti, 2017, Bioremediation of textile dyes by using blue green algae, International Journal for Scientific Research & Development, 5, 1322
  46. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.087 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.025 · DOI
  48. 10.4236/jep.2016.711128 · DOI
  49. C. Lavanya, 2014, Degradation of toxic dyes: a review, International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 3, 189
  50. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.016 · DOI
  51. F. A. Alseroury, 2018, Simultaneous decolorization of dye contaminated wastewater and energy production using algae, Journal of Biochemical Technology, 9, 15
  52. L. C. Arteaga, 2018, Removal of aniline blue dye using live microalgae Chlorella vulgaris, Journal of Energy & Environmental Sciences, 2, 6, 10.32829/eesj.v2i1.51 · DOI
  53. 10.1080/09593330.2014.908240 · DOI
  54. S. M. Gajare, 2012, Biosorption of malachite green by naturally grown algal biomass from Girna river, Jalgaon District, Maharashtra, Journal of Algal Biomass Utilization, 3, 60
  55. 10.1111/lam.13043 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.01.008 · DOI
  57. 10.1007/s13369-020-04557-9 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1080/02757540600579607 · DOI
  59. G. Vijayaraghavan, 2018, Effective removal of acid Black 1 dye in textile effluent using alginate from Brown algae as a coagulant, Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 37
  60. 10.1007/s11270-020-04585-z · DOI
  61. 10.3906/bot-1703-4 · DOI
  62. N. Daneshvar, 2005, Biodegradation of the textile dye malachite green by Microalgae Cosmarium sp, International Journal for Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, 1384, 1
  63. 10.7763/ijesd.2016.v7.748 · DOI
  64. 10.17957/ijab/14.0022 · DOI
  65. A. Al Hamadi, 2017, Adsorption of azo dyes from textile wastewater by Spirulina Platensis, Eurasian Journal of Environmental Research, 1, 19
  66. T. Ishchi, 2020, Azo dye degradation by Chlorella vulgaris: optimization and kinetics, International Journal of Biological Chemistry, 14, 1, 10.3923/ijbc.2020.1.7 · DOI
  67. 10.20372/ejssdastu:v7.i2.2020.186 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.010 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.05.025 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.11.004 · DOI
  71. 10.1007/s10532-010-9337-0 · DOI
  72. 10.1515/tjb-2017-0333 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/j.jtice.2012.10.009 · DOI
  74. N. S. Naji, 2019, Effect of temperature variation on the efficacy of Chlorella vulgaris in decolorization of Congo red from aqueous solutions, Biochemical and Cellular Archives, 19, 4169
  75. 10.1038/s41467-017-01547-8 · DOI
  76. K. S. Kumar, 2015, Microalgae-A promising tool for heavy metal remediation, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 113, 329, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.12.019 · DOI
  77. A. Suresh, 2019, Isolation and morphological identification of some indigenous microalgae from Ethiopia for phycoprospecting, Ethiopian Journal of Sciences and Sustainable Development, 6, 56
  78. 10.1002/9781119154051.ch22 · DOI
  79. 10.3390/molecules24224182 · DOI
  80. 10.3390/antiox8090406 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1007/s002530000333 · DOI
  82. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.03.009 · DOI
  83. 10.1038/s41598-018-31660-7 · DOI
  84. 10.1016/j.saa.2019.117347 · DOI
  85. 10.1080/10934520701244383 · DOI
  86. S. Yusra, 2010, Factors affecting biosorption of direct dyes from aqueous solution, Asian Journal of Chemistry, 22, 6625
  87. 10.1007/s11814-010-0261-0 · DOI
  88. 10.1080/19443994.2016.1156582 · DOI
  89. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113291 · DOI
  90. K. V. Kumar, 2006, Biosorption of malachite green, a cationic dye onto Pithophora sp., a fresh water algae, Dyes and Pigments, 69, 102, 10.1016/j.dyepig.2005.02.005 · DOI
  91. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.03.003 · DOI
  92. 10.1039/c9ra01169b · DOI
  93. H. Zohoorian, 2020, Microalgal bioremediation of heavy metals and dyes, 659, 10.1016/B978-0-12-818305-2.00041-3 · DOI
  94. 10.1007/s11157-012-9287-6 · DOI
  95. S. Murugesan, 2016, Biological decolorization and removal of metal from dye industry effluent by microalgae, Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia, 6, 111
  96. 10.1556/1886.2019.00018 · DOI · Paper page
  97. 10.1016/j.desal.2011.09.023 · DOI
  98. 10.5004/dwt.2019.24334 · DOI
  99. 10.1016/j.algal.2019.101509 · DOI · Paper page
  100. 10.1007/s41742-018-0161-4 · DOI
  101. G. Bayazıt, 2019, Biosorption, isotherm and kinetic properties of common textile dye by Phormidium animale, Global Nest Journal, 21, 1
  102. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.09.026 · DOI
  103. 10.1590/s0104-66322013000100003 · DOI
  104. 10.1155/2018/2124845 · DOI
  105. 10.1504/ijesd.2016.077378 · DOI
  106. 10.4314/wsa.v45i1.03 · DOI
  107. 10.1080/01932691.2020.1857263 · DOI
  108. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118197 · DOI
  109. 10.1016/j.jtice.2017.08.023 · DOI
  110. 10.1016/j.jece.2017.03.018 · DOI
  111. M. M. El Jamal, 2012, Biosorption of methylene blue by Chaetophora elegans algae: kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies, Acta Chimica Slovenica, 59, 24
  112. 10.1260/0263-6174.27.6.537 · DOI
  113. 10.1080/10889868.2014.918574 · DOI
  114. M. H. Hussein, 2018, Bioremediation of methyl orange onto Nostoc carneum biomass by adsorption, kinetics and isotherm studies, Global Advanced Research Journal of Microbiology, 7, 6

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ayele, A., Getachew, D., Kamaraj, M., & Suresh, A.
Affiliations
Addis Ababa Science and Technology University (ET)
Corresponding author
Kamaraj, M.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-05-19
Volume
2021
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 2090-9063 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-9071
DOI
10.1155/2021/9923643
OpenAlex
W3161625783
Cited by
114
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 6
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Enzyme-mediated dye degradation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
Keywords
phycoremediation, synthetic dyes, algal bioremediation, dye-contaminated wastewater, water pollution, dye classification, process parameters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review