The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of the Interaction of Ingenol 3-Angelate with Protein Kinase C
Open accessAbstract
Ingenol 3-angelate (I3A) is one of the active ingredients in Euphorbia peplus, which has been used in traditional medicine. Here, we report the initial characterization of I3A as a protein kinase C (PKC) ligand. I3A bound to PKC-α in the presence of phosphatidylserine with high affinity; however, under these assay conditions, little PKC isoform selectivity was observed. PKC isoforms did show different sensitivity and selectivity for down-regulation by I3A and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) in WEHI-231, HOP-92, and Colo-205 cells. In all of the three cell types, I3A inhibited cell proliferation with somewhat lower potency than did PMA. In intact CHO-K1 cells, I3A was able to translocate different green fluorescent protein-tagged PKC isoforms, visualized by confocal microscopy, with equal or higher potency than PMA. PKC-δ in particular showed a different pattern of translocation in response to I3A and PMA. I3A induced a higher level of secretion of the inflammatory cytokine interleukin 6 compared with PMA in the WEHI-231 cells and displayed a marked biphasic dose-response curve for the induction. I3A was unable to cause the same extent of association of the C1b domain of PKC-δ with lipids, compared with PMA or the physiological regulator diacylglycerol, and was able to partially block the association induced by these agents, measured by surface plasmon resonance. The in vitro kinase activity of PKC-α induced by I3A was lower than that induced by PMA. The novel pattern of behavior of I3A makes it of great interest for further evaluation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Protein Kinase C as a Molecular Machine for Decoding Calcium and Diacylglycerol Signals
Oancea, E., & Meyer, T. (1998) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81763-8 · Cited by 640
Skin tumor promotion by phorbol esters is a two-stage process.
Fürstenberger, G., Berry, D. L., Sorg, B., & Marks, F. (1981) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.78.12.7722 · Cited by 204
Cited by
Euphorbia Diterpenes: Isolation, Structure, Biological Activity, and Synthesis (2008–2012)
Vasas, A., & Hohmann, J. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400541j · Cited by 503
Enzymatic Chemistry of Cyclopropane, Epoxide, and Aziridine Biosynthesis
Thibodeaux, C. J., Chang, W.-C., & Liu, H.-W. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200073d · Cited by 275
Digging deep into “dirty” drugs – modulation of the methylation machinery
Pleyer, L., & Greil, R. (2015) · Drug Metabolism Reviews · doi:10.3109/03602532.2014.995379 · Cited by 84
“Although PKCd modulators have been assessed in vitro and in murine models as a targeted cancer therapy, clinical trials have thus far only been performed with topical formulations in actinic keratosis, for which approval was gained.”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Kedei, N., Lundberg, D. J., Toth, A., Welburn, P., Garfield, S. H., & Blumberg, P. M.
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2004-05-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3243-3255
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W1984120526
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of the Interaction of Ingenol 3-Angelate with Protein Kinase C. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3403
- The paper
- Kedei, N., Lundberg, D. J., Toth, A., Welburn, P., Garfield, S. H., & Blumberg, P. M. (2004). Characterization of the Interaction of Ingenol 3-Angelate with Protein Kinase C. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.