Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 426

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In Situ Tumor Ablation Creates an Antigen Source for the Generation of Antitumor Immunity

Open access
den Brok, Martijn H. M. G. M., Sutmuller, Roger P. M., van der Voort, Robbert, Bennink, Erik J., Figdor, Carl G., Ruers, Theo J. M., Adema, Gosse J.·2004·Cancer Research

Abstract

Tumor-destructing techniques, like radiofrequency ablation (RFA), allow eradication of large tumors. Potentially, in situ tumor destruction also can provide the immune system with an antigen source for the induction of antitumor immunity. Antigen-presenting cells could take up antigens in the periphery after which they induce specific immune responses. Recent data show that especially antigen-presenting dendritic cells are crucial for the induction of potent immune responses. However, virtually nothing is known regarding the induction of immune responses after in situ tumor destruction in mice or humans. We used the well-defined murine B16-OVA melanoma cell line to develop a novel tumor model to explore: (a) the immunologic consequences of in situ tumor destruction; and (b) the efficacy of a combination approach of tumor destruction and immunostimulation. Applying this model system we demonstrate that following RFA, a weak but detectable immune response develops, directed against OVA, but also against a broader range of B16 antigens. Adoptive transfer experiments further indicate that antitumor reactivity can be transferred to naïve mice by splenocytes. To augment the response observed, we administered a blocking monoclonal antibody against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 at the time of tumor destruction. Interestingly, this strongly enhanced antitumor immunity, resulting in long-lasting tumor protection. These results illustrate that in situ tumor destruction can provide a useful antigen source for the induction of antitumor immunity, provided that additional immunostimulatory signals are coadministered.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3949

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 426

Metadata

Authors
den Brok, M. H. M. G. M., Sutmuller, R. P. M., van der Voort, R., Bennink, E. J., Figdor, C. G., Ruers, T. J. M., & Adema, G. J.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2004-06-01
Volume
64
Issue
11
Pages
4024-4029
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2122924344
Cited by
426
References
6
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Situ Tumor Ablation Creates an Antigen Source for the Generation of Antitumor Immunity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3949
The paper
den Brok, M. H. M. G. M., Sutmuller, R. P. M., van der Voort, R., Bennink, E. J., Figdor, C. G., Ruers, T. J. M., & Adema, G. J. (2004). In Situ Tumor Ablation Creates an Antigen Source for the Generation of Antitumor Immunity. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3949

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.