The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibody Targeting of Long-Circulating Lipidic Nanoparticles Does Not Increase Tumor Localization but Does Increase Internalization in Animal Models
Abstract
We describe evidence for a novel mechanism of monoclonal antibody (MAb)–directed nanoparticle (immunoliposome) targeting to solid tumors in vivo. Long-circulating immunoliposomes targeted to HER2 (ErbB2, Neu) were prepared by the conjugation of anti-HER2 MAb fragments (Fab′ or single chain Fv) to liposome-grafted polyethylene glycol chains. MAb fragment conjugation did not affect the biodistribution or long-circulating properties of i.v.-administered liposomes. However, antibody-directed targeting also did not increase the tumor localization of immunoliposomes, as both targeted and nontargeted liposomes achieved similarly high levels (7-8% injected dose/g tumor tissue) of tumor tissue accumulation in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer xenografts (BT-474). Studies using colloidal gold-labeled liposomes showed the accumulation of anti-HER2 immunoliposomes within cancer cells, whereas matched nontargeted liposomes were located predominantly in extracellular stroma or within macrophages. A similar pattern of stromal accumulation without cancer cell internalization was observed for anti-HER2 immunoliposomes in non–HER2-overexpressing breast cancer xenografts (MCF-7). Flow cytometry of disaggregated tumors posttreatment with either liposomes or immunoliposomes showed up to 6-fold greater intracellular uptake in cancer cells due to targeting. Thus, in contrast to nontargeted liposomes, anti-HER2 immunoliposomes achieved intracellular drug delivery via MAb-mediated endocytosis, and this, rather than increased uptake in tumor tissue, was correlated with superior antitumor activity. Immunoliposomes capable of selective internalization in cancer cells in vivo may provide new opportunities for drug delivery. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(13): 6732-40)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Drug Delivery Systems: Entering the Mainstream
Allen, T. M., & Cullis, P. R. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1095833 · Cited by 4,552
Cited by
Danaei, M., Dehghankhold, M., Ataei, S., Hasanzadeh Davarani, F., Javanmard, R., Dokhani, A., Khorasani, S., & Mozafari, M. R. (2018) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics10020057 · Cited by 4,832
Liposomal drug delivery systems: From concept to clinical applications
Allen, T. M., & Cullis, P. R. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.037 · Cited by 4,839
Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer
Davis, M. E., Chen, Z., & Shin, D. M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2614 · Cited by 4,233
Impact of Nanotechnology on Drug Delivery
Farokhzad, O. C., & Langer, R. (2009) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn900002m · Cited by 3,348
Progress and challenges towards targeted delivery of cancer therapeutics
Rosenblum, D., Joshi, N., Tao, W., Karp, J. M., & Peer, D. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03705-y · Cited by 2,220
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirpotin, D. B., Drummond, D. C., Shao, Y., Shalaby, M. R., Hong, K., Nielsen, U. B., Marks, J. D., Benz, C. C., & Park, J. W.
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2006-07-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 6732-6740
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W2156969927
- Cited by
- 1,125
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibody Targeting of Long-Circulating Lipidic Nanoparticles Does Not Increase Tumor Localization but Does Increase Internalization in Animal Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-4199
- The paper
- Kirpotin, D. B., Drummond, D. C., Shao, Y., Shalaby, M. R., Hong, K., Nielsen, U. B., Marks, J. D., Benz, C. C., & Park, J. W. (2006). Antibody Targeting of Long-Circulating Lipidic Nanoparticles Does Not Increase Tumor Localization but Does Increase Internalization in Animal Models. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-4199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.