Cited by 134DNA Repair MechanismsCancer therapeutics and mechanismsDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

5-Fluorouracil Incorporated into DNA Is Excised by the Smug1 DNA Glycosylase to Reduce Drug Cytotoxicity

An, Qian, Robins, Peter, Lindahl, Tomas, Barnes, Deborah E.·2007·Cancer Research

Abstract

5-Fluorouracil (FU) has been widely used for more than four decades in the treatment of a range of common cancers. The fluorine-substituted uracila analogue is converted to several active metabolites but the mechanism of cytotoxicity has remained unclear. In a widely cited but unsubstantiated model, FU is thought to kill cells via the inhibition of thymidylate synthase and increased use of dUTP in place of TTP during DNA replication, with subsequent excision of high levels of uracil causing the fragmentation of newly synthesized DNA. Using gene-targeted cell lines defective in one or both of the two mammalian uracil-DNA glycosylase repair enzymes, we were able to test this model of FU cytotoxicity. Here, we show that incorporation of FU itself into DNA has been previously underestimated and is a predominant cause of cytotoxicity. FU readily becomes incorporated into the DNA of drug-treated cells, and accumulation of FU in the genome, rather than uracil excision, is correlated with FU cytotoxicity in mammalian cells. Furthermore, the Smug1, but not the Ung, uracil-DNA glycosylase excises FU from DNA and protects against cell killing. The data provides a clearer understanding of the action of FU, suggesting predictive biomarkers of drug response and a mechanism for acquired resistance in tumors. [Cancer Res 2007;67(3):940–5]

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-2960

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
An, Q., Robins, P., Lindahl, T., & Barnes, D. E.
Affiliations
Cancer Research UK (GB)
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2007-02-01
Volume
67
Issue
3
Pages
940-945
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2096588719
Cited by
134
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
5-fluorouracil, uracil-DNA glycosylase, DNA repair, drug cytotoxicity, thymidylate synthase inhibition, DNA replication, acquired drug resistance, predictive biomarkers
MeSH terms
Animals, Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic, Cell Line, DNA, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Fibroblasts, Fluorouracil, Humans, RNA, Small Interfering, Mice, Uracil-DNA Glycosidase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review