The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Subtypes of Breast Cancer Show Preferential Site of Relapse
Abstract
We explored whether the five previously reported molecular subtypes in breast cancer show a preference for organ-specific relapse and searched for molecular pathways involved. The “intrinsic” gene list describing the subtypes was used to classify 344 primary breast tumors of lymph node–negative patients. Fisher exact tests were used to determine the association between a tumor subtype and a particular site of distant relapse in these patients who only received local treatment. Modulated genes and pathways were identified in the various groups using Significance Analysis of Microarrays and Global Testing. Bone relapse patients were most abundant in the luminal subtypes but were found less than expected in the basal subtype. The reverse was true for lung and brain relapse patients with the remark that absence of lung relapse was luminal A specific. Finally, a pleura relapse, although rare, was found almost exclusively in both luminal subtypes. Many differentially expressed genes were identified, of which several were in common in a subtype and the site to which the subtype preferentially relapsed. WNT signaling was up-regulated in the basal subtype and in brain-specific relapse, and down-modulated in the luminal B subtype and in bone-specific relapse. Focal adhesion was found up-regulated in the luminal A subtype but down-regulated in lung relapse. The five major molecular subtypes in breast cancer are evidently different with regard to their ability to metastasize to distant organ(s), and share biological features and pathways with their preferred distant metastatic site. [Cancer Res 2008;68(9):3108–14]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · Cited by 16,184
Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to lung
Minn, A. J., Gupta, G. P., Siegel, P. M., Bos, P. D., Shu, W., Giri, D. D., Viale, A., Olshen, A. B., Gerald, W. L., & Massagué, J. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03799 · Cited by 2,922
Lung metastasis genes couple breast tumor size and metastatic spread
Minn, A. J., Gupta, G. P., Padua, D., Bos, P., Nguyen, D. X., Nuyten, D., Kreike, B., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Ishwaran, H., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701138104 · Cited by 400
Self-citationHiraga, T., Kizaka-Kondoh, S., Hirota, K., Hiraoka, M., & Yoneda, T. (2007) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-2355 · Cited by 242
Cited by
Metabolic reprogramming and cancer progression
Faubert, B., Solmonson, A., & DeBerardinis, R. J. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw5473 · Cited by 2,740
Metastatic Behavior of Breast Cancer Subtypes
Kennecke, H., Yerushalmi, R., Woods, R., Cheang, M. C. U., Voduc, D., Speers, C. H., Nielsen, T. O., & Gelmon, K. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.25.9820 · Cited by 2,262
Metastatic heterogeneity of breast cancer: Molecular mechanism and potential therapeutic targets
Liang, Y., Zhang, H., Song, X., & Yang, Q. (2020) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.08.012 · Cited by 992
Breast cancer cells produce tenascin C as a metastatic niche component to colonize the lungs
Oskarsson, T., Acharyya, S., Zhang, X. H.-F., Vanharanta, S., Tavazoie, S. F., Morris, P. G., Downey, R. J., Manova-Todorova, K., Brogi, E., & Massagué, J. (2011) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2379 · Cited by 869
Molecular biology in breast cancer: Intrinsic subtypes and signaling pathways
Eroles, P., Bosch, A., Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo, J., & Lluch, A. (2012) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.11.005 · Cited by 624
Metadata
- Authors
- Smid, M., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Sieuwerts, A. M., Yu, J., Klijn, J. G. M., Foekens, J. A., & Martens, J. W. M.
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2008-05-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3108-3114
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W2167105148
- Cited by
- 813
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 12.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subtypes of Breast Cancer Show Preferential Site of Relapse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-5644
- The paper
- Smid, M., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Sieuwerts, A. M., Yu, J., Klijn, J. G. M., Foekens, J. A., & Martens, J. W. M. (2008). Subtypes of Breast Cancer Show Preferential Site of Relapse. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-5644
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.