Cited by 365Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications

Influence of Affinity and Antigen Internalization on the Uptake and Penetration of Anti-HER2 Antibodies in Solid Tumors

Open access
Rudnick, Stephen I., Lou, Jianlong, Shaller, Calvin C., Tang, Yong, Klein-Szanto, Andres J.P., Weiner, Louis M., Marks, James D., Adams, Gregory P.·2011·Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Antibody drugs are widely used in cancer therapy, but conditions to maximize tumor penetration and efficacy have yet to be fully elucidated. In this study, we investigated the impact of antibody binding affinity on tumor targeting and penetration with affinity variants that recognize the same epitope. Specifically, we compared four derivatives of the C6.5 monoclonal antibody (mAb), which recognizes the same HER2 epitope (monovalent KD values ranging from 270 to 0.56 nmol/L). Moderate affinity was associated with the highest tumor accumulation at 24 and 120 hours after intravenous injection, whereas high affinity was found to produce the lowest tumor accumulation. Highest affinity mAbs were confined to the perivascular space of tumors with an average penetration of 20.4 ± 7.5 μm from tumor blood vessels. Conversely, lowest affinity mAbs exhibited a broader distribution pattern with an average penetration of 84.8 ± 12.8 μm. In vitro internalization assays revealed that antibody internalization and catabolism generally increased with affinity, plateauing once the rate of HER2 internalization exceeded the rate of antibody dissociation. Effects of internalization and catabolism on tumor targeting were further examined using antibodies of moderate (C6.5) or high-affinity (trastuzumab), labeled with residualizing (111In-labeled) or nonresidualizing (125I-labeled) radioisotopes. Significant amounts of antibody of both affinities were degraded by tumors in vivo. Furthermore, moderate- to high-affinity mAbs targeting the same HER2 epitope with monovalent affinity above 23 nmol/L had equal tumor accumulation of residualizing radiolabel over 120 hours. Results indicated equal tumor exposure, suggesting that mAb penetration and retention in tumors reflected affinity-based differences in tumor catabolism. Together, these results suggest that high-density, rapidly internalizing antigens subject high-affinity antibodies to greater internalization and degradation, thereby limiting their penetration of tumors. In contrast, lower-affinity antibodies penetrate tumors more effectively when rates of antibody–antigen dissociation are higher than those of antigen internalization. Together, our findings offer insights into how to optimize the ability of therapeutic antibodies to penetrate tumors. Cancer Res; 71(6); 2250–9. ©2011 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-2277

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rudnick et al. showed that when targeting high-density and rapidly internalized antigens such as HER2, a lower-affinity antibody could penetrate tumors more effectively, while an ultrahigh-affinity antibody could limit the distribution of the antibody to tumor as a result of binding site barrier.

    “For example, Rudnick et al. showed that when targeting high‐density and rapidly internalized antigens such as HER2, a lower‐affinity antibody could penetrate tumors more effectively, while an ultrahigh‐affinity antibody could limit the distribution of the antibody to tumor as a result of “binding site barrier.”27”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rudnick, S. I., Lou, J., Shaller, C. C., Tang, Y., Klein-Szanto, A. J. P., Weiner, L. M., Marks, J. D., & Adams, G. P.
Affiliations
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center (US)
  • Authors' Affiliations: 1Developmental Therapeutics Program and 2Pathology Department, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; 3Department of Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco, California; and 4Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Colombia
Corresponding author
Adams, Gregory P.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2011-03-14
Volume
71
Issue
6
Pages
2250-2259
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2103364597
Cited by
365
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 17
FWCI
17.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center
  • National Cancer Institute (R01-CA50633, R01CA118159, T32CA009035, R01CA050633)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Keywords
anti-HER2 antibody, antibody affinity, tumor penetration, tumor targeting, antigen uptake, antibody internalization, antibody catabolism, tumor accumulation, trastuzumab, HER2, perivascular spaces, solid tumors
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antibody Affinity, Epitopes, Antigens, Neoplasm, Binding, Competitive, Endocytosis, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Immunohistochemistry, Indium Radioisotopes, Iodine Radioisotopes, Mutation, Neoplasm Transplantation, Ovarian Neoplasms, Time Factors, Tissue Distribution, Transplantation, Heterologous, Mice, SCID, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review