Cited by 216Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesMelanoma and MAPK PathwaysLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

Antitumor Activity of BRAF Inhibitor Vemurafenib in Preclinical Models of BRAF-Mutant Colorectal Cancer

Open access
Yang, Hong, Higgins, Brian, Kolinsky, Kenneth, Packman, Kathryn, Bradley, William D., Lee, Richard J., Schostack, Kathleen, Simcox, Mary Ellen +5 more·2012·Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The protein kinase BRAF is a key component of the RAS–RAF signaling pathway which plays an important role in regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. Mutations in BRAF at codon 600 promote catalytic activity and are associated with 8% of all human (solid) tumors, including 8% to 10% of colorectal cancers (CRC). Here, we report the preclinical characterization of vemurafenib (RG7204; PLX4032; RO5185426), a first-in-class, specific small molecule inhibitor of BRAFV600E in BRAF-mutated CRC cell lines and tumor xenograft models. As a single agent, vemurafenib shows dose-dependent inhibition of ERK and MEK phosphorylation, thereby arresting cell proliferation in BRAFV600-expressing cell lines and inhibiting tumor growth in BRAFV600E bearing xenograft models. Because vemurafenib has shown limited single-agent clinical activity in BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic CRC, we therefore explored a range of combination therapies, with both standard agents and targeted inhibitors in preclinical xenograft models. In a BRAF-mutant CRC xenograft model with de novo resistance to vemurafenib (RKO), tumor growth inhibition by vemurafenib was enhanced by combining with an AKT inhibitor (MK-2206). The addition of vemurafenib to capecitabine and/or bevacizumab, cetuximab and/or irinotecan, or erlotinib resulted in increased antitumor activity and improved survival in xenograft models. Together, our findings suggest that the administration of vemurafenib in combination with standard-of-care or novel targeted therapies may lead to enhanced and sustained clinical antitumor efficacy in CRCs harboring the BRAFV600E mutation. Cancer Res; 72(3); 779–89. ©2011 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-2941

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BRAF inhibitors have proven ineffective as single agents due to adaptive feedback re-activation of the MAPK and other signaling pathways.

    “BRAF inhibitors have proven ineffective as single agents due to adaptive feedback re-activation of the MAPK and other signaling pathways [5–13, 38].”

    From Co-targeting SRC overcomes resistance to BRAF inhibitors in colorectal cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Discussion reports modest clinical efficacy for single-agent vemurafenib in BRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer and proposes that alternative survival pathways may limit its effect. It does not establish adaptive feedback reactivation of MAPK as the cause; in the resistant RKO cells, vemurafenib still reduced MEK and ERK phosphorylation. The claim also generalizes beyond the colorectal cancer setting studied here. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Combined inhibition of EGFR and BRAF can be synergistic in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancers.

    “preclinical studies have provided a proof of principle that the combined inhibition of EGFR and BRAF can be synergistic in BRAF-mutant CRCs”
  • Best responses of colorectal cancer cell xenografts to combined EGFR and BRAF inhibition were only disease stabilizations or mild tumor regressions.

    “the best responses of CRC cell xenografts to such combinations were only disease stabilizations or mild tumor regressions [52, 58-60].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, H., Higgins, B., Kolinsky, K., Packman, K., Bradley, W. D., Lee, R. J., Schostack, K., Simcox, M. E., Kopetz, S., Heimbrook, D., Lestini, B., Bollag, G., & Su, F.
Affiliations
Plexxikon (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Su, Fei
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2012-01-31
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
779-789
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2096024381
Cited by
216
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 20
FWCI
11.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (KL2TR000370)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Keywords
vemurafenib, BRAF V600E mutation, BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer, Ras/Raf signaling, combination therapy, capecitabine, bevacizumab, cetuximab, irinotecan, erlotinib, vemurafenib resistance, tumor xenograft models
MeSH terms
Bevacizumab, Cetuximab, Capecitabine, Erlotinib Hydrochloride, Irinotecan, Vemurafenib, Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Camptothecin, Deoxycytidine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Fluorouracil, Humans, Indoles, Mice, Nude, Mutation, Phosphorylation, Quinazolines, Sulfonamides, Blotting, Western, Colorectal Neoplasms, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, HT29 Cells, Area Under Curve, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, HCT116 Cells, Cell Line, Tumor, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review