CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 64

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

HPV16 E5 Mediates Resistance to PD-L1 Blockade and Can Be Targeted with Rimantadine in Head and Neck Cancer

Miyauchi, Sayuri, Sanders, P. Dominick, Guram, Kripa, Kim, Sangwoo S., Paolini, Francesca, Venuti, Aldo, Cohen, Ezra E.W., Gutkind, J. Silvio, Califano, Joseph A., Sharabi, Andrew B.·2020·Cancer Research
DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.can-19-1771PMC PMC7024675

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There is a critical need to understand mechanisms of resistance and to develop combinatorial strategies to improve responses to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy (CBI). Here, we uncover a novel mechanism by which the human papillomavirus (HPV) inhibits the activity of CBI in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Using orthotopic HNSCC models, we show that radiation combined with anti–PD-L1 immunotherapy significantly enhanced local control, CD8+ memory T cells, and induced preferential T-cell homing via modulation of vascular endothelial cells. However, the HPV E5 oncoprotein suppressed immune responses by downregulating expression of major histocompatibility complex and interfering with antigen presentation in murine models and patient tumors. Furthermore, tumors expressing HPV E5 were rendered entirely resistant to anti–PD-L1 immunotherapy, and patients with high expression of HPV16 E5 had worse survival. The antiviral E5 inhibitor rimantadine demonstrated remarkable single-agent antitumor activity. This is the first report that describes HPV E5 as a mediator of resistance to anti–PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and demonstrates the antitumor activity of rimantadine. These results have broad clinical relevance beyond HNSCC to other HPV-associated malignancies and reveal a powerful mechanism of HPV-mediated immunosuppression, which can be exploited to improve response rates to checkpoint blockade. Significance: This study identifies a novel mechanism of resistance to anti–PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy mediated by HPV E5, which can be exploited using the HPV E5 inhibitor rimantadine to improve outcomes for head and neck cancer patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-19-1771

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. Cohen, 2019, Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study, Lancet, 393, 156, 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31999-8 · DOI
  2. Sharabi, 2015, Radiation and checkpoint blockade immunotherapy: radiosensitisation and potential mechanisms of synergy, Lancet Oncol, 16, e498, 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00007-8 · DOI
  3. Sharabi, 2015, Stereotactic radiation therapy augments antigen-specific PD-1-mediated antitumor immune responses via cross-presentation of tumor antigen, Cancer Immunol Res, 3, 345, 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0196 · DOI
  4. Guram, 2018, Radiation therapy combined with checkpoint blockade immunotherapy for metastatic undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the maxillary sinus with a complete response, Front Oncol, 8, 435, 10.3389/fonc.2018.00435 · DOI
  5. Miyauchi, 2019, Immune modulation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and the tumor microenvironment by conventional therapeutics, Clin Cancer Res, 25, 4211, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0871 · DOI
  6. Yu, 2019, JAVELIN head and neck 100: a phase III trial of avelumab and chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer, Future Oncol, 15, 687, 10.2217/fon-2018-0405 · DOI
  7. Bahig, 2019, Phase I/II trial of durvalumab plus tremelimumab and stereotactic body radiotherapy for metastatic head and neck carcinoma, BMC Cancer, 19, 68, 10.1186/s12885-019-5266-4 · DOI
  8. Bonomo, 2018, Anti PD-L1 DUrvalumab combined with cetuximab and RadiOtherapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A phase I/II study (DUCRO), Clin Transl Radiat Oncol, 9, 42, 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.01.005 · DOI
  9. Gillison, 2017, A randomized phase II study of chemoradiation (CRT) ± nivolumab (Nivo) with sequential safety evaluations of Nivo ± lirilumab (Liri) or ipilumumab (Ipi) concomitant with (C) RT in intermediate (IR) and high-risk (HR) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) (RTOG 3504, NCT02764593), J Clin Oncol, 35, TPS6097, 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.TPS6097 · DOI
  10. Siu, 2018, Abstract CT163: KEYNOTE-412: pembrolizumab plus chemoradiation vs. chemoradiation alone for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, Cancer Res, 78, CT163, 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2018-CT163 · DOI
  11. Powell, 2017, Safety of pembrolizumab with chemoradiation (CRT) in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN), J Clin Oncol, 35, 6011, 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.6011 · DOI
  12. Oweida, 2017, Ionizing radiation sensitizes tumors to PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade in orthotopic murine head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, Oncoimmunology, 6, e1356153, 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1356153 · DOI
  13. Conway, 2009, Replication and assembly of human papillomaviruses, J Dent Res, 88, 307, 10.1177/0022034509333446 · DOI
  14. Hoppe-Seyler, 2018, The HPV E6/E7 oncogenes: key factors for viral carcinogenesis and therapeutic targets, Trends Microbiol, 26, 158, 10.1016/j.tim.2017.07.007 · DOI
  15. Senba, 2012, Mechanisms of virus immune evasion lead to development from chronic inflammation to cancer formation associated with human papillomavirus infection, Oncol Rev, 6, e17, 10.4081/oncol.2012.e17 · DOI
  16. O'Brien, 2002, Evasion of host immunity directed by papillomavirus-encoded proteins, Virus Res, 88, 103, 10.1016/S0168-1702(02)00123-5 · DOI
  17. Venuti, 2011, Papillomavirus E5: the smallest oncoprotein with many functions, Mol Cancer, 10, 140, 10.1186/1476-4598-10-140 · DOI
  18. Campo, 2010, HPV-16 E5 down-regulates expression of surface HLA class I and reduces recognition by CD8 T cells, Virology, 407, 137, 10.1016/j.virol.2010.07.044 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Cortese, 2010, All 4 di-leucine motifs in the first hydrophobic domain of the E5 oncoprotein of human papillomavirus type 16 are essential for surface MHC class I downregulation activity and E5 endomembrane localization, Int J Cancer, 126, 1675, 10.1002/ijc.25004 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Ashrafi, 2005, E5 protein of human papillomavirus type 16 selectively downregulates surface HLA class I, Int J Cancer, 113, 276, 10.1002/ijc.20558 · DOI · Paper page
  21. DiMaio, 2013, The E5 proteins, Virology, 445, 99, 10.1016/j.virol.2013.05.006 · DOI
  22. Paolini, 2013, Immunotherapy in new pre-clinical models of HPV-associated oral cancers, Hum Vaccin Immunother, 9, 534, 10.4161/hv.23232 · DOI
  23. Hoover, 2007, The role of human papillomavirus 16 E6 in anchorage-independent and invasive growth of mouse tonsil epithelium, Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 133, 495, 10.1001/archotol.133.5.495 · DOI
  24. Judd, 2012, Comparative analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in a syngeneic mouse model of oral cancer, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 147, 493, 10.1177/0194599812442037 · DOI
  25. Wang, 2019, Syngeneic animal model of tobacco-associated oral cancer reveals the activity of in situ anti-CTLA-4, Nat Commun, 10.1038/s41467-019-13471-0 · DOI
  26. Guo, 2016, Characterization of functionally active gene fusions in human papillomavirus related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, Int J Cancer, 139, 373, 10.1002/ijc.30081 · DOI
  27. Slaney, 2014, Trafficking of T cells into tumors, Cancer Res, 74, 7168, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2458 · DOI
  28. Lechner, 2017, Characterization of tumor-associated T-lymphocyte subsets and immune checkpoint molecules in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, Oncotarget, 8, 44418, 10.18632/oncotarget.17901 · DOI
  29. Partlova, 2015, Distinct patterns of intratumoral immune cell infiltrates in patients with HPV-associated compared to non-virally induced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, Oncoimmunology, 4, e965570, 10.4161/21624011.2014.965570 · DOI
  30. Sharma, 2017, Primary, adaptive, and acquired resistance to cancer immunotherapy, Cell, 168, 707, 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.017 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Ranieri, 2015, HPV16 E5 expression induces switching from FGFR2b to FGFR2c and epithelial-mesenchymal transition, Int J Cancer, 137, 61, 10.1002/ijc.29373 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Paaso, 2019, From HPV infection to lesion progression: the role of HLA alleles and host immunity, Acta Cytol, 63, 148, 10.1159/000494985 · DOI
  33. Wetherill, 2018, Alkyl-imino sugars inhibit the pro-oncogenic ion channel function of human papillomavirus (HPV) E5, Antiviral Res, 158, 113, 10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.08.005 · DOI
  34. Wetherill, 2012, High-risk human papillomavirus E5 oncoprotein displays channel-forming activity sensitive to small-molecule inhibitors, J Virol, 86, 5341, 10.1128/JVI.06243-11 · DOI
  35. Spanos, 2009, Immune response during therapy with cisplatin or radiation for human papillomavirus-related head and neck cancer, Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 135, 1137, 10.1001/archoto.2009.159 · DOI
  36. Williams, 2009, Preclinical models of HPV+ and HPV- HNSCC in mice: an immune clearance of HPV+ HNSCC, Head Neck, 31, 911, 10.1002/hed.21040 · DOI
  37. Garnett, 2004, Sublethal irradiation of human tumor cells modulates phenotype resulting in enhanced killing by cytotoxic T lymphocytes, Cancer Res, 64, 7985, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1525 · DOI
  38. Lugade, 2005, Local radiation therapy of B16 melanoma tumors increases the generation of tumor antigen-specific effector cells that traffic to the tumor, J Immunol, 174, 7516, 10.4049/jimmunol.174.12.7516 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Reits, 2006, Radiation modulates the peptide repertoire, enhances MHC class I expression, and induces successful antitumor immunotherapy, J Exp Med, 203, 1259, 10.1084/jem.20052494 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Demaria, 2004, Ionizing radiation inhibition of distant untreated tumors (abscopal effect) is immune mediated, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 58, 862, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.012 · DOI
  41. Formenti, 2018, Radiotherapy induces responses of lung cancer to CTLA-4 blockade, Nat Med, 24, 1845, 10.1038/s41591-018-0232-2 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Young, 2016, Optimizing timing of immunotherapy improves control of tumors by hypofractionated radiation therapy, PLoS One, 11, e0157164, 10.1371/journal.pone.0157164 · DOI
  43. Filatenkov, 2015, Ablative tumor radiation can change the tumor immune cell microenvironment to induce durable complete remissions, Clin Cancer Res, 21, 3727, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2824 · DOI
  44. Dovedi, 2014, Acquired resistance to fractionated radiotherapy can be overcome by concurrent PD-L1 blockade, Cancer Res, 74, 5458, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1258 · DOI
  45. Battaglia, 2010, Selective changes in the immune profile of tumor-draining lymph nodes after different neoadjuvant chemoradiation regimens for locally advanced cervical cancer, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 76, 1546, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.014 · DOI
  46. Wu, 2015, Targeting the inhibitory receptor CTLA-4 on T cells increased abscopal effects in murine mesothelioma model, Oncotarget, 6, 12468, 10.18632/oncotarget.3487 · DOI
  47. Muroyama, 2017, Stereotactic radiotherapy increases functionally suppressive regulatory T cells in the tumor microenvironment, Cancer Immunol Res, 5, 992, 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0040 · DOI
  48. Bashaw, 2017, Modulation of antigen presenting cell functions during chronic HPV infection, Papillomavirus Res, 4, 58, 10.1016/j.pvr.2017.08.002 · DOI
  49. Ashrafi, 2006, E5 protein of human papillomavirus 16 downregulates HLA class I and interacts with the heavy chain via its first hydrophobic domain, Int J Cancer, 119, 2105, 10.1002/ijc.22089 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Ashrafi, 2006, Down-regulation of MHC class I is a property common to papillomavirus E5 proteins, Virus Res, 120, 208, 10.1016/j.virusres.2006.02.005 · DOI
  51. Zhang, 2003, The E5 protein of human papillomavirus type 16 perturbs MHC class II antigen maturation in human foreskin keratinocytes treated with interferon-gamma, Virology, 310, 100, 10.1016/S0042-6822(03)00103-X · DOI · Paper page
  52. Straight, 1995, The E5 oncoprotein of human papillomavirus type 16 inhibits the acidification of endosomes in human keratinocytes, J Virol, 69, 3185, 10.1128/jvi.69.5.3185-3192.1995 · DOI
  53. Gameiro, 2017, Analysis of class I major histocompatibility complex gene transcription in human tumors caused by human papillomavirus infection, Viruses, 9, 10.3390/v9090252 · DOI
  54. Straight, 1993, The E5 oncoprotein of human papillomavirus type 16 transforms fibroblasts and effects the downregulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor in keratinocytes, J Virol, 67, 4521, 10.1128/jvi.67.8.4521-4532.1993 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Crusius, 1998, The human papillomavirus type 16 E5-protein modulates ligand-dependent activation of the EGF receptor family in the human epithelial cell line HaCaT, Exp Cell Res, 241, 76, 10.1006/excr.1998.4024 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Tomakidi, 2000, Modulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor by the human papillomavirus type 16 E5 protein in raft cultures of human keratinocytes, Eur J Cell Biol, 79, 407, 10.1078/0171-9335-00060 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Gu, 1995, Effect of human papillomavirus type 16 oncogenes on MAP kinase activity, J Virol, 69, 8051, 10.1128/jvi.69.12.8051-8056.1995 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Wasson, 2017, Human papillomavirus type 18 E5 oncogene supports cell cycle progression and impairs epithelial differentiation by modulating growth factor receptor signalling during the virus life cycle, Oncotarget, 8, 103581, 10.18632/oncotarget.21658 · DOI
  59. Kabsch, 2002, The human papillomavirus type 16 E5 protein impairs TRAIL- and FasL-mediated apoptosis in HaCaT cells by different mechanisms, J Virol, 76, 12162, 10.1128/JVI.76.23.12162-12172.2002 · DOI

Cited by

See all 64

Metadata

Authors
Miyauchi, S., Sanders, P. D., Guram, K., Kim, S. S., Paolini, F., Venuti, A., Cohen, E. E. W., Gutkind, J. S., Califano, J. A., & Sharabi, A. B.
Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
  • 4HPV-Unit, UOSD Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
  • 2Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
ORCID
Venuti, Aldo
Venue
Cancer Research
Publisher
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Published
2020-02-14
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
732-746
ISSN
  • 0008-5472
  • 1538-7445
DOI
10.1158/0008-5472.can-19-1771
PMC
PMC7024675
Cited by
64
References
3
Language
en
Funders
  • NIH (1KL2TR001444, 1R01DE028563, 1U01DE028227)
  • CCSG (P30CA23100)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review