Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dietary Carotenoids and Risk of Lung Cancer in a Pooled Analysis of Seven Cohort Studies

Open access
Männistö, Satu, Smith-Warner, Stephanie A., Spiegelman, Donna, Albanes, Demetrius, Anderson, Kristin, van den Brandt, Piet A., Cerhan, James R., Colditz, Graham, Feskanich, Diane, Freudenheim, Jo L., Giovannucci, Edward, Goldbohm, R. Alexandra, Graham, Saxon, Miller, Anthony B., Rohan, Thomas E., Virtamo, Jarmo, Willett, Walter C., Hunter, David J.·2004·Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

Abstract

Intervention trials with supplemental β-carotene have observed either no effect or a harmful effect on lung cancer risk. Because food composition databases for specific carotenoids have only become available recently, epidemiological evidence relating usual dietary levels of these carotenoids with lung cancer risk is limited. We analyzed the association between lung cancer risk and intakes of specific carotenoids using the primary data from seven cohort studies in North America and Europe. Carotenoid intakes were estimated from dietary questionnaires administered at baseline in each study. We calculated study-specific multivariate relative risks (RRs) and combined these using a random-effects model. The multivariate models included smoking history and other potential risk factors. During follow-up of up to 7–16 years across studies, 3,155 incident lung cancer cases were diagnosed among 399,765 participants. β-Carotene intake was not associated with lung cancer risk (pooled multivariate RR = 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.87–1.11; highest versus lowest quintile). The RRs for α-carotene, lutein/zeaxanthin, and lycopene were also close to unity. β-Cryptoxanthin intake was inversely associated with lung cancer risk (RR = 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.67–0.86; highest versus lowest quintile). These results did not change after adjustment for intakes of vitamin C (with or without supplements), folate (with or without supplements), and other carotenoids and multivitamin use. The associations generally were similar among never, past, or current smokers and by histological type. Although smoking is the strongest risk factor for lung cancer, greater intake of foods high in β-cryptoxanthin, such as citrus fruit, may modestly lower the risk.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-038-3

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 218

Metadata

Authors
Männistö, S., Smith-Warner, S. A., Spiegelman, D., Albanes, D., Anderson, K., van den Brandt, P. A., Cerhan, J. R., Colditz, G., Feskanich, D., Freudenheim, J. L., Giovannucci, E., Goldbohm, R. A., Graham, S., Miller, A. B., Rohan, T. E., Virtamo, J., Willett, W. C., & Hunter, D. J.
Venue
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2004-01-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
40-48
ISSN
  • 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7755
OpenAlex
W2111392737
Cited by
218
References
10
FWCI
10.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dietary Carotenoids and Risk of Lung Cancer in a Pooled Analysis of Seven Cohort Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-038-3
The paper
Männistö, S., Smith-Warner, S. A., Spiegelman, D., Albanes, D., Anderson, K., van den Brandt, P. A., Cerhan, J. R., Colditz, G., Feskanich, D., Freudenheim, J. L., Giovannucci, E., Goldbohm, R. A., Graham, S., Miller, A. B., Rohan, T. E., Virtamo, J., Willett, W. C., & Hunter, D. J. (2004). Dietary Carotenoids and Risk of Lung Cancer in a Pooled Analysis of Seven Cohort Studies. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-038-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.