Cited by 107Nutritional Studies and DietPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesPhytoestrogen effects and research

Dietary flavonoid intake and breast cancer survival among women on Long Island

Fink, Brian N., Steck, Susan E., Wolff, Mary S., Britton, Julie A., Kabat, Geoffrey C., Gaudet, Mia M., Abrahamson, Page E., Bell, Paula +4 more·2007·Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

Abstract

Background: Laboratory research and a growing number of epidemiologic studies have provided evidence for a reduced risk of breast cancer associated with dietary intake of certain classes of flavonoids. However, the effects of flavonoids on survival are not known. In a population-based cohort of breast cancer patients, we investigated whether dietary flavonoid intake before diagnosis is associated with subsequent survival. Methods: Women ages 25 to 98 years who were newly diagnosed with a first primary invasive breast cancer between August 1, 1996, and July 31, 1997, and participated in a population-based, case-control study (n = 1,210) were followed for vital status through December 31, 2002. At the case-control interview conducted shortly after diagnosis, respondents completed a FFQ that assessed dietary intake in the previous 12 months. All-cause mortality (n = 173 deaths) and breast cancer–specific mortality (n = 113 deaths) were determined through the National Death Index. Results: Reduced hazard ratios [age- and energy-adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)] for all-cause mortality were observed among premenopausal and postmenopausal women for the highest quintile of intake, compared with the lowest, for flavones [0.63 (0.41-0.96)], isoflavones [0.52 (0.33-0.82)], and anthocyanidins [0.64 (0.42-0.98)]. No significant trends in risk were observed. Results were similar for breast cancer–specific mortality only. Conclusion: Mortality may be reduced in association with high levels of dietary flavones and isoflavones among postmenopausal U.S. breast cancer patients. Larger studies are needed to confirm our findings. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(11):2285–92)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-07-0245

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of seven prospective studies examining survival, four (57%) showed protective effects on breast cancer mortality or mortality in breast cancer patients.

    “Of seven studies examining survival [94,96,98,100,101,106,112], four (57%) showed protective effects on breast cancer mortality or mortality in breast cancer patients [94,96,101,112].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fink, B. N., Steck, S. E., Wolff, M. S., Britton, J. A., Kabat, G. C., Gaudet, M. M., Abrahamson, P. E., Bell, P., Schroeder, J. C., Teitelbaum, S. L., Neugut, A. I., & Gammon, M. D.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • 1Epidemiology and Departments of
Venue
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2007-11-01
Volume
16
Issue
11
Pages
2285-2292
ISSN
  • 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7755
OpenAlex
W2028623628
Cited by
107
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (UO1CA66572, UO1CA/ES66572, CA 52283, T32CA009330, U01CA052283, U01CA066572)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES010126)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
Keywords
dietary flavonoids, breast cancer survival, flavones, isoflavones, anthocyanidins, all-cause mortality, breast cancer-specific mortality, postmenopausal women, premenopausal women, Long Island
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Flavonoids, Humans, Middle Aged, New York, Socioeconomic Factors, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies, Premenopause, Postmenopause

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review