Dietary flavonoid intake and breast cancer survival among women on Long Island
Abstract
Background: Laboratory research and a growing number of epidemiologic studies have provided evidence for a reduced risk of breast cancer associated with dietary intake of certain classes of flavonoids. However, the effects of flavonoids on survival are not known. In a population-based cohort of breast cancer patients, we investigated whether dietary flavonoid intake before diagnosis is associated with subsequent survival. Methods: Women ages 25 to 98 years who were newly diagnosed with a first primary invasive breast cancer between August 1, 1996, and July 31, 1997, and participated in a population-based, case-control study (n = 1,210) were followed for vital status through December 31, 2002. At the case-control interview conducted shortly after diagnosis, respondents completed a FFQ that assessed dietary intake in the previous 12 months. All-cause mortality (n = 173 deaths) and breast cancer–specific mortality (n = 113 deaths) were determined through the National Death Index. Results: Reduced hazard ratios [age- and energy-adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)] for all-cause mortality were observed among premenopausal and postmenopausal women for the highest quintile of intake, compared with the lowest, for flavones [0.63 (0.41-0.96)], isoflavones [0.52 (0.33-0.82)], and anthocyanidins [0.64 (0.42-0.98)]. No significant trends in risk were observed. Results were similar for breast cancer–specific mortality only. Conclusion: Mortality may be reduced in association with high levels of dietary flavones and isoflavones among postmenopausal U.S. breast cancer patients. Larger studies are needed to confirm our findings. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(11):2285–92)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Of seven prospective studies examining survival, four (57%) showed protective effects on breast cancer mortality or mortality in breast cancer patients.
“Of seven studies examining survival [94,96,98,100,101,106,112], four (57%) showed protective effects on breast cancer mortality or mortality in breast cancer patients [94,96,101,112].”
From Soy, Red Clover, and Isoflavones and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review (2013) · cites this paper as [101]
Cites
Hertog, M. G. L., Hollman, P. C. H., Katan, M. B., & Kromhout, D. (1993) · Nutrition and Cancer · doi:10.1080/01635589309514267 · Cited by 1,216 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Soy, Red Clover, and Isoflavones and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
Fritz, H., Seely, D., Flower, G., Skidmore, B., Fernandes, R., Vadeboncoeur, S., Kennedy, D., Cooley, K., Wong, R., Sagar, S., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081968 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Post-diagnosis soy food intake and breast cancer survival: A meta-analysis of cohort studies
Chi, F., Wu, R., Zeng, Y.-C., Xing, R., Liu, Y., & Xu, Z.-G. (2013) · Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.4.2407 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Qiu, S., & Jiang, C. (2019) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-018-1853-4 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fink, B. N., Steck, S. E., Wolff, M. S., Britton, J. A., Kabat, G. C., Gaudet, M. M., Abrahamson, P. E., Bell, P., Schroeder, J. C., Teitelbaum, S. L., Neugut, A. I., & Gammon, M. D.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
- National Cancer Institute (US)
- 1Epidemiology and Departments of
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Published
- 2007-11-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2285-2292
- ISSN
- 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2028623628
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 7.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (UO1CA66572, UO1CA/ES66572, CA 52283, T32CA009330, U01CA052283, U01CA066572)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES010126)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
- Keywords
- dietary flavonoids, breast cancer survival, flavones, isoflavones, anthocyanidins, all-cause mortality, breast cancer-specific mortality, postmenopausal women, premenopausal women, Long Island
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Flavonoids, Humans, Middle Aged, New York, Socioeconomic Factors, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies, Premenopause, Postmenopause
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review