Childhood soy intake and breast cancer risk in Asian American women
Abstract
Introduction: Historically, breast cancer incidence has been substantially higher in the United States than in Asia. When Asian women migrate to the United States, their breast cancer risk increases over several generations and approaches that for U.S. Whites. Thus, modifiable factors, such as diet, may be responsible. Methods: In this population-based case-control study of breast cancer among women of Chinese, Japanese, and Filipino descent, ages 20 to 55 years, and living in San Francisco-Oakland (California), Los Angeles (California) and Oahu (Hawaii), we interviewed 597 cases (70% of those eligible) and 966 controls (75%) about adolescent and adult diet and cultural practices. For subjects with mothers living in the United States (39% of participants), we interviewed mothers of 99 cases (43% of eligible) and 156 controls (40%) about the daughter's childhood exposures. Seventy-three percent of study participants were premenopausal at diagnosis. Results: Comparing highest with lowest tertiles, the multivariate relative risks (95% confidence interval) for childhood, adolescent, and adult soy intake were 0.40 (0.18-0.83; Ptrend = 0.03), 0.80 (0.59-1.08; Ptrend = 0.12), and 0.76 (0.56-1.02; Ptrend = 0.04), respectively. Inverse associations with childhood intake were noted in all three races, all three study sites, and women born in Asia and the United States. Adjustment for measures of westernization attenuated the associations with adolescent and adult soy intake but did not affect the inverse relationship with childhood soy intake. Discussion: Soy intake during childhood, adolescence, and adult life was associated with decreased breast cancer risk, with the strongest, most consistent effect for childhood intake. Soy may be a hormonally related, early-life exposure that influences breast cancer incidence. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(4):1050–9)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Five of six studies examining soyfood consumption in childhood found higher soy intake (≥1 to ≥4 servings per week) was significantly protective against breast cancer in adulthood.
“Five of six studies examining the effects of soyfood consumption in childhood found that higher soy intake, ranging from ≥1 to ≥4 servings per week, compared to lower intake, was significantly protective against breast cancer in adulthood [62,71,73,77,78].”
From Soy, Red Clover, and Isoflavones and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review (2013) · cites this paper as [62]
Cites
Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators (2002) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.288.3.321 · Cited by 15,889 · see citing works
Soya foods and breast cancer risk: A prospective study in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan
Key, T. J., Sharp, G. B., Appleby, P. N., Beral, V, Goodman, M. T., Soda, M., & Mabuchi, K. (1999) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6690837 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Soy and Health Update: Evaluation of the Clinical and Epidemiologic Literature
Messina, M. (2016) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu8120754 · Cited by 537 · see citing works
Soy, Red Clover, and Isoflavones and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
Fritz, H., Seely, D., Flower, G., Skidmore, B., Fernandes, R., Vadeboncoeur, S., Kennedy, D., Cooley, K., Wong, R., Sagar, S., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081968 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Diet and cancer risk in the Korean population: A meta- analysis
Woo, H. D., Park, S., Oh, K., Kim, H. J., Shin, H. R., Moon, H. K., & Kim, J. (2014) · Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.19.8509 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Kronenberg, F. (2010) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.109.120840 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Gordon-Dseagu, V. L. Z., Thompson, F. E., Subar, A. F., Ruder, E. H., Thiébaut, A. C. M., Potischman, N., & Stolzenberg-Solomon, R. (2017) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwx036 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Korde, L. A., Wu, A. H., Fears, T., Nomura, A. M. Y., West, D. W., Kolonel, L. N., Pike, M. C., Hoover, R. N., & Ziegler, R. G.
- Affiliations
- 1Clinical Genetics Branch and
- University of Southern California (US)
- National Cancer Institute (US)
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- Cancer Prevention Institute of California (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Published
- 2009-04-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1050-1059
- ISSN
- 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2149374273
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 13.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging
- National Cancer Institute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
- Keywords
- soy consumption, breast cancer risk, childhood diet, Asian American women, Westernization, early life exposure, dietary factors, premenopausal women
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Asian, Breast Neoplasms, California, Child, Child Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Child, Preschool, Diet, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Glycine max, Incidence, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review