Cited by 67Nutritional Studies and DietFolate and B Vitamins ResearchColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

Choline and betaine intake and the risk of colorectal cancer in men

Open access
Lee, Jung Eun, Giovannucci, Edward, Fuchs, Charles S., Willett, Walter C., Zeisel, Steven H., Cho, Eunyoung·2010·Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

Abstract

Dietary choline and betaine have been hypothesized to decrease the risk of cancer because of their role as methyl donors in the one-carbon metabolism. However, it remains unknown whether dietary intake of choline and betaine is associated with colorectal cancer risk. We prospectively examined the associations between dietary choline and betaine intake and risk of colorectal cancer in men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. We followed 47,302 men and identified a total of 987 incident colorectal cancer cases from 1986 to 2004. We assessed dietary and supplemental choline and betaine intake every 4 years using a validated semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate multivariate relative risks and 95% confidence intervals. All statistical tests were two-sided. We did not find any statistically significant associations between choline intake or betaine intake and risk of colorectal cancer. Comparing the top quintile with bottom quintile, multivariate relative risks (95% confidence interval) were 0.97 (0.79-1.20; P(trend) = 0.87) for choline intake and 0.94 (0.77-1.16; P(trend) = 0.79) for betaine intake. Similarly, we observed no associations between colorectal cancer risk and choline from free choline, glycerophosphocholine, phosphocholine, phosphatidylcholine, or sphingomyelin. Our data do not support the hypothesis that choline and betaine intake is inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-09-1295

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some but not all prospective studies associated higher dietary and plasma levels of choline with increased risk of colorectal neoplasia.

    “Some,147, 148 but not all,149–151 prospective studies have associated higher dietary and plasma levels of choline with increased risk of colorectal neoplasia.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, J. E., Giovannucci, E., Fuchs, C. S., Willett, W. C., Zeisel, S. H., & Cho, E.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Jung Eun
Venue
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2010-03-01
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
884-887
ISSN
  • 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7755
OpenAlex
W2107160040
Cited by
67
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CA55075)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-55075, R03CA125763, CA125763, P01CA055075)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK055865, DK-55865, P30DK040561)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES010126)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Folate and B Vitamins Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Keywords
choline, betaine, colorectal cancer, dietary intake, methyl donors, one-carbon metabolism, cancer risk, men, Health Professionals Follow-up Study, dietary supplements, phosphatidylcholine, sphingomyelin
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Betaine, Choline, Diet, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Colorectal Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review