Cited by 75Nutritional Studies and DietFolate and B Vitamins ResearchCancer Risks and Factors

Choline and betaine intake is inversely associated with breast cancer risk: a two-stage case-control study in China

Open access
Zhang, Cai‐Xia, Pan, Mei‐Xia, Li, Bin, Wang, Lian, Mo, Xiong‐Fei, Chen, Yu‐Ming, Lin, Fang‐Yu, Ho, Suzanne C.·2013·Cancer Science

Abstract

Few epidemiological studies have evaluated the association of choline and betaine intake with breast cancer risk and the results remain inconsistent. This study aimed to assess the relationship between dietary intake of choline and betaine and the risk of breast cancer among Chinese women. A two-stage case-control study was conducted, with 807 cases and 807 age- (5-year interval) and residence (rural/urban)-matched controls. A validated food frequency questionnaire was used to assess dietary intake by face-to-face interview. An unconditional logistic regression model was used to calculate multivariate-adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A significant inverse association was found between dietary choline and betaine consumption and breast cancer risk. The adjusted OR for the highest quartile of intake compared with the lowest were 0.40 (95% CI = 0.28-0.57, P(trend) < 0.001) for total choline intake, 0.58 (95% CI = 0.42-0.80, P(trend) < 0.001) for betaine intake and 0.38 (0.27-0.53, P(trend) < 0.001) for choline plus betaine intake, respectively. Intakes of individual choline compouds, choline from glycerophosphocholine, phosphocholine, phosphatidylcholine, sphingomyelin and free choline were also negatively associated with breast cancer risk. The inverse association between choline intake and breast cancer risk was primarily confined to participants with low folate level (<242 g/day), with an OR (95% CI) of 0.46 (0.23-0.91) comparing the fourth quartile with the first quartile of choline intake (P(trend) = 0.005). The present study suggests that consumption of choline and betaine is inversely associated with the risk of breast cancer. The association of choline intake with breast cancer risk is probably modified by folate intake.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cas.12064

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A diet high in choline and betaine is associated with decreased breast and lung cancer risk.

    “In contrast, a diet high in choline and betaine was associated with a decreased breast and lung cancer risk (Xu et al., 2009a; Ying et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013).”

    From The emerging hallmarks of cancer metabolism (2016) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Yang YX, Wang GY, Pan XC. China Food Composition. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press, 2002.
  2. Zeisel SH, Mar MH, Howe JC, Holden JM. Erratum: concentrations of choline-containing compounds and betaine in common foods. J Nutr 2003; 133: 2918-9.
  3. Chinese Nutrition Society. Chinese Dietary Reference Intake, 1st edn. Beijing: China Light Industry Press, 2000.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, C., Pan, M., Li, B., Wang, L., Mo, X., Chen, Y., Lin, F., & Ho, S. C.
Affiliations
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Department of Clinical Nutrition Guangdong General Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences) Guangzhou China
  • The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Cai‐Xia
  • Ho, Suzanne C.
Venue
Cancer Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-26
Volume
104
Issue
2
Pages
250-258
ISSN
  • 1347-9032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1349-7006
OpenAlex
W1968955250
Cited by
75
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Folate and B Vitamins Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
choline, betaine, breast cancer risk, dietary intake, folic acid, choline-containing compounds, phosphatidylcholine, sphingomyelin, Chinese women
MeSH terms
Betaine, Breast Neoplasms, China, Choline, Diet, Eating, Female, Folic Acid, Humans, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review