Cited by 101Nutritional Studies and DietFolate and B Vitamins ResearchCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Dietary choline and betaine; associations with subclinical markers of cardiovascular disease risk and incidence of CVD, coronary heart disease and stroke: the Jackson Heart Study

Open access
Millard, Heather R., Musani, Solomon K., Dibaba, Daniel T., Talegawkar, Sameera A., Taylor, Herman A., Tucker, Katherine L., Bidulescu, Aurelian·2018·European Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Purpose Several mechanisms have been described through which dietary intake of choline and its derivative betaine may be associated in both directions with subclinical atherosclerosis. We assessed the association of dietary intake of choline and betaine with cardiovascular risk and markers of subclinical cardiovascular disease.Methods Data from 3924 Jackson Heart Study (JHS) African-American participants with complete food frequency questionnaire at baseline and follow-up measurements of heart disease measures were used. Multivariable linear regression models were employed to assess associations between choline and betaine intake with carotid intima-media thickness, coronary artery calcium, abdominal aortic calcium and left ventricular mass. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate associations with time to incident coronary heart disease (CHD), ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disease (CVD).Results During an average nine years of follow-up, 124 incident CHD events, 75 incident stroke events and 153 incident CVD events were documented. In women, greater choline intake was associated with lower left ventricular mass (p = 0.0006 for trend across choline quartiles) and with abdominal aortic calcium score. Among all JHS participants, there was a statistically significant inverse association between dietary choline intake and incident stroke, β = -0.33 (p = 0.04). Betaine intake was associated with greater risk of incident CHD when comparing the third quartile of intake with the lowest quartile of intake (HR 1.89, 95 % CI 1.14, 3.15).Conclusions Among our African-American participants, higher dietary choline intake was associated with a lower risk of incident ischemic stroke, and thus putative dietary benefits. Higher dietary betaine intake was associated with a nonlinear higher risk of incident CHD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00394-016-1296-8

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Jackson Heart Study (3,924 African-Americans), higher dietary choline was associated with reduced risk of incident ischemic stroke.

    “In the Jackson Heart Study, involving 3,924 African-Americans, higher dietary choline was associated with reduced risk of incident ischemic stroke, whereas higher betaine intake was associated with a nonlinear higher risk of incident coronary heart disease (78).”
  • In the Jackson Heart Study, higher betaine intake was associated with a nonlinear higher risk of incident coronary heart disease.

    “In the Jackson Heart Study, involving 3,924 African-Americans, higher dietary choline was associated with reduced risk of incident ischemic stroke, whereas higher betaine intake was associated with a nonlinear higher risk of incident coronary heart disease (78).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Millard, H. R., Musani, S. K., Dibaba, D. T., Talegawkar, S. A., Taylor, H. A., Tucker, K. L., & Bidulescu, A.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Morehouse School of Medicine (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
Corresponding author
Bidulescu, Aurelian
Venue
European Journal of Nutrition
Published
2016-08-22
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
51-60
ISSN
  • 1436-6207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1436-6215
OpenAlex
W2508273478
Cited by
101
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks Open (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (N01-HC-95170)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Folate and B Vitamins Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
dietary choline, betaine, cardiovascular risk, coronary artery disease, ischemic stroke, subclinical atherosclerosis, carotid intima-media thickness, coronary artery calcium, left ventricular mass, African American adults, Jackson Heart Study
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Betaine, Black or African American, Cardiovascular Diseases, Choline, Coronary Disease, Diet, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mississippi, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Diet Records, Proportional Hazards Models, Stroke, Black People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review