The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimation of the Number of Women Living with Metastatic Breast Cancer in the United States
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Distant metastatic breast cancer (MBC), including metastases found at diagnosis (de novo) and those occurring later (recurrence), represents the most severe form of the disease, when resource utilization is most intensive. Yet, the number of women living with MBC in the United States is unknown. The objective of this article is to use population-based data to estimate the prevalence of MBC. Methods: We used a back-calculation method to estimate MBC prevalence from U.S. breast cancer mortality and survival from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries. On the basis of the illness–death process, this method assumes that each observed breast cancer death is the result of MBC, either de novo or a recurrence with metastatic disease. Results: We estimate that by January 1, 2017, there will be 154,794 women living with MBC in the United States, three in four initially diagnosed with stage I–III breast cancer who later progressed to MBC. Median survival and 5-year relative survival for de novo MBC increased over the years, especially in younger women. We estimate a two-fold increase in 5-year relative survival rate from 18% to 36%, for women diagnosed with de novo MBC at age 15–49 between 1992–1994 and 2005–2012, respectively. Conclusions: This study demonstrates an increasing number of women in the United States living with MBC, likely the result of improvements in treatment and aging of the U.S. population. Impact: The increasing burden of MBC highlights the importance of documenting recurrence to foster more research into the specific needs of this understudied population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(6); 809–15. ©2017 AACR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mapping the quality of life and unmet needs of urban women with metastatic breast cancer
ARANDA, S., SCHOFIELD, P., WEIH, L., YATES, P., MILNE, D., FAULKNER, R., & VOUDOURIS, N. (2005) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00541.x · Cited by 215
Cleeland, C. S., Mayer, M., Dreyer, N. A., Yim, Y. M., Yu, E., Su, Z., Mun, Y., Sloan, J. A., & Kaufman, P. A. (2014) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/j.breast.2014.08.004 · Cited by 75
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Miller, 2016, Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016, CA Cancer J Clin, 66, 271, 10.3322/caac.21349 · DOI · Paper page
- Mariotto, 2011, Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010–2020, J Natl Cancer Inst, 103, 117, 10.1093/jnci/djq495 · DOI · Paper page
- Yang, 2008, Surviving recurrence: psychological and quality-of-life recovery, Cancer, 112, 1178, 10.1002/cncr.23272 · DOI
- Mayer, 2010, Lessons learned from the metastatic breast cancer community, Semin Oncol Nurs, 26, 195, 10.1016/j.soncn.2010.05.004 · DOI
- Byrne, 1992, The prevalence of cancer among adults in the United States: 1987, Cancer, 69, 2154, 10.1002/1097-0142(19920415)69:8<2154::AID-CNCR2820690823>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
- De Angelis, 1994, MIAMOD: a computer package to estimate chronic disease morbidity using mortality and survival data, Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 44, 99, 10.1016/0169-2607(94)90091-4 · doi:10.1016/0169-2607(94)90091-4
- Verdecchia, 1989, A method for the estimation of chronic disease morbidity and trends from mortality data, Stat Med, 8, 201, 10.1002/sim.4780080207 · DOI
- Clements, 2012, Estimating prevalence of distant metastatic breast cancer: a means of filling a data gap, Cancer Cause Control, 23, 1625, 10.1007/s10552-012-0040-9 · doi:10.1007/s10552-012-0040-9
- De Angelis, 2009, Breast cancer survivors in the United States: geographic variability and time trends, 2005–2015, Cancer, 115, 1954, 10.1002/cncr.24217 · DOI
- Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program (SEER) Adjusted AJCC 6th Edition Stage Classification [website]
- Yu, 2004, Cure fraction estimation from the mixture cure models for grouped survival data, Stat Med, 23, 1733, 10.1002/sim.1774 · DOI
- Yu, 2005, CANSURV: A Windows program for population-based cancer survival analysis, Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 80, 195, 10.1016/j.cmpb.2005.08.002 · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2005.08.002
- Dawood, 2010, Survival differences among women with de novo stage IV and relapsed breast cancer, Ann Oncol, 21, 2169, 10.1093/annonc/mdq220 · DOI · Paper page
- Giordano, 2004, Is breast cancer survival improving? Trends in survival for patients with recurrent breast cancer diagnosed from 1974 through 2000, Cancer, 100, 44, 10.1002/cncr.11859 · DOI · Paper page
- Chia, 2007, The impact of new chemotherapeutic and agents on survival in a population-based of women with metastatic breast cancer hormone cohort, Cancer, 110, 973, 10.1002/cncr.22867 · DOI · Paper page
- Pal, 2012, Impact of modern chemotherapy on the survival of women presenting with de novo metastatic breast cancer, BMC Cancer, 12, 10.1186/1471-2407-12-435 · DOI
- Johnson, 2013, Incidence of Breast Cancer With Distant Involvement Among Women in the United States, 1976 to 2009, JAMA, 309, 800, 10.1001/jama.2013.776 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Breast Cancer Treatment: A Review
Waks, A. G., & Winer, E. P. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.19323 · Cited by 4,804
Harbeck, N., Penault-Llorca, F., Cortes, J., Gnant, M., Houssami, N., Poortmans, P., Ruddy, K., Tsang, J., & Cardoso, F. (2019) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0111-2 · Cited by 3,024
Wang, R., Zhu, Y., Liu, X., Liao, X., He, J., & Niu, L. (2019) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-019-6311-z · Cited by 459
Lipsyc-Sharf, M., de Bruin, E. C., Santos, K., McEwen, R., Stetson, D., Patel, A., Kirkner, G. J., Hughes, M. E., Tolaney, S. M., Partridge, A. H., et al. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.22.00908 · Cited by 152
Porter, L. S., Carson, J. W., Olsen, M., Carson, K. M., Sanders, L., Jones, L., Westbrook, K., & Keefe, F. J. (2019) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-019-04710-7 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Mariotto, A. B., Etzioni, R., Hurlbert, M., Penberthy, L., & Mayer, M.
- Venue
- Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Published
- 2017-05-31
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 809-815
- ISSN
- 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2616354594
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation of the Number of Women Living with Metastatic Breast Cancer in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0889
- The paper
- Mariotto, A. B., Etzioni, R., Hurlbert, M., Penberthy, L., & Mayer, M. (2017). Estimation of the Number of Women Living with Metastatic Breast Cancer in the United States. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0889
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.