Cited by 584Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Exon 19 Deletion Mutations of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Are Associated with Prolonged Survival in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Gefitinib or Erlotinib

Jackman, David M., Yeap, Beow Y., Sequist, Lecia V., Lindeman, Neal, Holmes, Alison J., Joshi, Victoria A., Bell, Daphne W., Huberman, Mark S. +7 more·2006·Clinical Cancer Research

Abstract

PURPOSE: Somatic mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have been detected in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are associated with sensitivity to treatment with gefitinib or erlotinib. Our study explored the relationship between the two most common types of somatic EGFR mutations, exon 19 deletions and the L858R point mutation, and outcomes of patients following treatment with gefitinib or erlotinib. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Tumor specimens obtained before treatment with gefitinib or erlotinib were analyzed for EGFR mutations. Patients with exon 19 deletion or L858R mutations were identified. The response rate, time to progression, and overall survival were determined for the two groups. RESULTS: We identified 36 patients with NSCLC and an EGFR mutation who were treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. Patients with an exon 19 deletion had a significantly longer overall survival compared with patients with an L858R mutation (38 versus 17 months; P = 0.04). There were also trends toward higher response rate (73% versus 50%) and improved time to progression (24 versus 10 months) for the patients with an exon 19 deletion, although these were not independently significant in a multivariate analysis. A difference in response rate for patients treated with gefitinib compared with erlotinib was also noted [18 of 23 (78%) versus 3 of 9 (33%); P = 0.04]. No obvious difference in time to progression or overall survival was noted between gefitinib- and erlotinib-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NSCLC and EGFR exon 19 deletions have a longer survival following treatment with gefitinib or erlotinib compared with those with the L858R mutation. Pooling of greater numbers of patients and completion of prospective trials are needed to further define the predictive and prognostic roles of different EGFR mutations with respect to treatment with gefitinib, erlotinib, and other EGFR inhibitors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-0462

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple studies have affirmed the favorable prognostic impact of exon 19 EGFR deletions compared with exon 21 L858R substitution.

    “Multiple studies have affirmed the favorable prognostic impact of exon 19 EGFR deletions compared with exon 21 L858R amino acid substitution, although the molecular basis for this association has not been conclusively determined44, 45.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jackman, D. M., Yeap, B. Y., Sequist, L. V., Lindeman, N., Holmes, A. J., Joshi, V. A., Bell, D. W., Huberman, M. S., Halmos, B., Rabin, M. S., Haber, D. A., Lynch, T. J., Meyerson, M., Johnson, B. E., & Jänne, P. A.
Affiliations
  • 1Lowe Center of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology and
  • 3Medicine and
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • 8Pathology and
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • 12Ireland Cancer Center, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2006-07-01
Volume
12
Issue
13
Pages
3908-3914
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2168841302
Cited by
584
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 33
FWCI
38.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA114465, P20CA090578, P20 CA 90578-02, 1K12CA87723-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
EGFR exon 19 deletion, L858R mutation, non-small cell lung cancer, gefitinib, erlotinib, EGFR inhibitors, overall survival, time to progression, treatment response, predictive biomarkers, prognostic factors
MeSH terms
Erlotinib Hydrochloride, Gefitinib, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, DNA Mutational Analysis, DNA, Neoplasm, Exons, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Genotype, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Quinazolines, Retrospective Studies, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Point Mutation, Sequence Deletion, Disease Progression, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review