Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Heterogeneity of Breast Cancer Metastases: Comparison of Therapeutic Target Expression and Promoter Methylation Between Primary Tumors and Their Multifocal Metastases

Open access
Wu, Julie M., Fackler, Mary Jo, Halushka, Marc K., Molavi, Diana W., Taylor, M. Evangeline, Teo, Wei Wen, Griffin, Constance, Fetting, John, Davidson, Nancy E., De Marzo, Angelo M., Hicks, Jessica L., Chitale, Dhananjay, Ladanyi, Marc, Sukumar, Saraswati, Argani, Pedram·2008·Clinical Cancer Research

Abstract

Purpose: A comprehensive comparison of biomarker expression between patients' primary breast carcinoma (PBC) and their metastatic breast carcinomas (MBC) has not been done. Experimental Design: We did rapid autopsies (postmortem intervals, 1-4 hours) on 10 consenting patients who died of MBC. We constructed single-patient tissue microarrays from the patients' archived PBC and multiple different MBCs harvested at autopsy, which were immunohistochemically labeled for multiple biomarkers. Methylation of multiple gene promoters was assessed quantitatively on dissected PBC and MBC samples. Results: Extensive heterogeneity was observed between PBC and their paired MBC, as well as among multiple MBC from the same patient. Estrogen and progesterone receptors tended to be uniformly down-regulated in metastases. E-cadherin was down-regulated in a subset of the MBC of one case. Variable overexpression in MBC compared with the PBC was observed for cyclooxygenase-2 (five cases), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR; four cases), MET (four cases), and mesothelin (four cases). No case strongly overexpressed HER-2/neu by immunohistochemistry, but eight cases showed variable protein expression ranging from negative to equivocal (2+) in different MBC. In one case, variable low-level HER-2/neu gene amplification was found. EGFR and MET overexpression were restricted to the four basal-type cancers. EGFR protein overexpression did not correlate with EGFR gene amplification. Multigene promoter hypermethylation of RASSF1a, HIN1, cyclin D2, Twist, estrogen receptor α, APC1, and RARβ was overall very similar in the PBC and all MBCs in all cases. Conclusions: Therapeutic targets identified in the PBC or even some MBC may not reflect targets present in all metastatic sites.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-4082

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Wu, J. M., Fackler, M. J., Halushka, M. K., Molavi, D. W., Taylor, M. E., Teo, W. W., Griffin, C., Fetting, J., Davidson, N. E., De Marzo, A. M., Hicks, J. L., Chitale, D., Ladanyi, M., Sukumar, S., & Argani, P.
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2008-04-01
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
1938-1946
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2112995207
Cited by
202
References
2
FWCI
6.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heterogeneity of Breast Cancer Metastases: Comparison of Therapeutic Target Expression and Promoter Methylation Between Primary Tumors and Their Multifocal Metastases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-4082
The paper
Wu, J. M., Fackler, M. J., Halushka, M. K., Molavi, D. W., Taylor, M. E., Teo, W. W., Griffin, C., Fetting, J., Davidson, N. E., De Marzo, A. M., Hicks, J. L., Chitale, D., Ladanyi, M., Sukumar, S., & Argani, P. (2008). Heterogeneity of Breast Cancer Metastases: Comparison of Therapeutic Target Expression and Promoter Methylation Between Primary Tumors and Their Multifocal Metastases. Clinical Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-4082

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.