The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phase I Study of GRN1005 in Recurrent Malignant Glioma
Abstract
PURPOSE: GRN1005 is a peptide-drug conjugate with the ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and tumor cells by targeting the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-1. We conducted a first-in-human phase I trial of GRN1005 in patients with recurrent glioma. METHODS: Patients received GRN1005 by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Doses were escalated using a modified Fibonacci scheme. Study objectives included safety, tolerability, identification of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and preliminary evidence of efficacy. Tumor extracted from patients undergoing surgery following administration of GRN1005 was analyzed to determine whether therapeutic concentrations of GRN1005 were achieved. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients received GRN1005 at doses of 30 to 700 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. Therapy was well tolerated with neutropenia, leucopenia, and fatigue as the most frequent drug-associated grade 3/4 or higher toxicities. The MTD was 650 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3 mucositis and grade 4 neutropenia. There was no evidence of central nervous system toxicity or antibody production. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that exposure to GRN1005 was dose proportional. We observed one complete and two partial responses. Eight of 27 patients dosed ≥ 420 mg/m(2) had stable disease, which lasted a median of 51 days. Therapeutic concentrations of GRN1005 and free paclitaxel were shown in tumor tissue of surgical patients dosed with ≥ 200 mg/m(2). CONCLUSION: GRN1005 delivers paclitaxel across the BBB and achieves therapeutic concentrations in tumor tissue. It has similar toxicity to paclitaxel and appears to have activity in recurrent glioma. The recommended phase II dose is 650 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Besides on the BBB, LRP1 was also found to be highly expressed on glioma cells39–41.”
From Brain-targeted drug delivery by manipulating protein corona functions (2019) · cites this paper as [39]
In the citing paper
“Our study further suggests that regulation of LRP-1 cell surface expression and function, through gene silencing or pharmacological inhibition of catalytic MMP activity, might become very useful in enhancing the chemotherapeutic effects of An2–drug conjugates [46,68,69] by promoting their internalization in both low-grade- and high-grade gliomas.”
From MT1-MMP Expression Levels and Catalytic Functions Dictate LDL Receptor-Related Protein-1 Ligand Internalization Capacity in U87 Glioblastoma Cells (2022) · cites this paper as [46]
Citations
Cites
Radiotherapy Plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma
Stupp, R., Mason, W. P., van den Bent, M. J., Weller, M., Fisher, B., Taphoorn, M. J. B., Belanger, K., Brandes, A. A., Marosi, C., Bogdahn, U., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa043330 · Cited by 21,807
Wen, P. Y., & Kesari, S. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0708126 · Cited by 3,511
Self-citationBevacizumab Alone and in Combination With Irinotecan in Recurrent Glioblastoma
Friedman, H. S., Prados, M. D., Wen, P. Y., Mikkelsen, T., Schiff, D., Abrey, L. E., Yung, W. K. A., Paleologos, N. A., Nicholas, M. K., Jensen, R. L., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.19.8721 · Cited by 2,516
Self-citationResponse criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma.
Macdonald, D. R., Cascino, T. L., Schold, S. C., & Cairncross, J. G. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1990.8.7.1277 · Cited by 2,409
Kreisl, T. N., Kim, L., Moore, K., Duic, P., Royce, C., Stroud, I., Garren, N., Mackey, M. A., Butman, J. A., Camphausen, K. A., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.16.3055 · Cited by 1,567
Shibata, M., Yamada, S., Kumar, S. R., Calero, M., Bading, J., Frangione, B., Holtzman, D. M., Miller, C. A., Strickland, D. K., Ghiso, J., et al. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci10498 · Cited by 1,413
Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings.
Aronen, H. J., Gazit, I. E., Louis, D. N., Buchbinder, B. R., Pardo, F. S., Weisskoff, R. M., Harsh, G. R., Cosgrove, G. R., Halpern, E. F., & Hochberg, F. H. (1994) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.191.1.8134596 · Cited by 905
Lillis, A. P., Van Duyn, L. B., Murphy-Ullrich, J. E., & Strickland, D. K. (2008) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00033.2007 · Cited by 669
Demeule, M., Currie, J., Bertrand, Y., Ché, C., Nguyen, T., Régina, A., Gabathuler, R., Castaigne, J., & Béliveau, R. (2008) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05492.x · Cited by 557
Self-citationWick, W., Puduvalli, V. K., Chamberlain, M. C., van den Bent, M. J., Carpentier, A. F., Cher, L., Mason, W. P., Weller, M., Hong, S., Musib, L. C., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.23.2595 · Cited by 518
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The blood–brain barrier and blood–tumour barrier in brain tumours and metastases
Arvanitis, C., Ferraro, G. B., & Jain, R. K. (2019) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-019-0205-x · Cited by 1,919
Wen, P. Y., Weller, M., Lee, E. Q., Alexander, B. M., Barnholtz-Sloan, J. S., Barthel, F. P., Batchelor, T. T., Bindra, R. S., Chang, S. M., Chiocca, E. A., et al. (2020) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa106 · Cited by 1,168
Self-citationOvercoming the blood–brain tumor barrier for effective glioblastoma treatment
van Tellingen, O., Yetkin-Arik, B., de Gooijer, M. C., Wesseling, P., Wurdinger, T., & de Vries, H. E. (2015) · Drug Resistance Updates · doi:10.1016/j.drup.2015.02.002 · Cited by 1,035
Glioblastoma multiforme: Pathogenesis and treatment
Alifieris, C. E., & Trafalis, D. T. (2015) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.05.005 · Cited by 859
Nanomaterial-based blood-brain-barrier (BBB) crossing strategies
Xie, J., Shen, Z., Anraku, Y., Kataoka, K., & Chen, X. (2019) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119491 · Cited by 604
Metadata
- Authors
- Drappatz, J., Brenner, A., Wong, E. T., Eichler, A., Schiff, D., Groves, M. D., Mikkelsen, T., Rosenfeld, S., Sarantopoulos, J., Meyers, C. A., Fielding, R. M., Elian, K., Wang, X., Lawrence, B., Shing, M., Kelsey, S., Castaigne, J. P., & Wen, P. Y.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Clinical Cancer Research
- Published
- 2013-03-14
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1567-1576
- ISSN
- 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-3265
- OpenAlex
- W2111631341
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 6.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
- Keywords
- recurrent malignant glioma, peptide-drug conjugates, LDL receptor-related protein 1, blood-brain barrier penetration, paclitaxel, maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics, dose-limiting toxicity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Blood-Brain Barrier, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Glioma, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Neoplasm Staging, Peptides, Paclitaxel, Maximum Tolerated Dose, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review