Cited by 42Cancer Cells and MetastasisColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesGene expression and cancer classification

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Composite Gene Expression Signature Optimizes Prediction of Colorectal Cancer Metastasis and Outcome

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: We previously found that an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)–based gene expression signature was highly correlated with the first principal component (PC1) of 326 colorectal cancer tumors and was prognostic. This study was designed to improve these signatures for better prediction of metastasis and outcome. Experimental Design: A total of 468 colorectal cancer tumors including all stages (I–IV) and metastatic lesions were used to develop a new prognostic score (ΔPC1.EMT) by subtracting the EMT signature score from its correlated PC1 signature score. The score was validated on six other independent datasets with a total of 3,697 tumors. Results: ΔPC1.EMT was found to be far more predictive of metastasis and outcome than its parent scores. It performed well in stages I to III, among microsatellite instability subtypes, and across multiple mutation-based subclasses, demonstrating a refined capacity to predict distant metastatic potential even in tumors with a “good” prognosis. For example, in the PETACC-3 clinical trial dataset, it predicted worse overall survival in an adjusted multivariable model for stage III patients (HR standardized by interquartile range [IQR] = 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.25–1.81; P = 0.000016, N = 644). The improved performance of ΔPC1.EMT was related to its propensity to identify epithelial-like subpopulations as well as mesenchymal-like subpopulations. Biologically, the signature was correlated positively with RAS signaling but negatively with mitochondrial metabolism. ΔPC1.EMT was a “best of assessed” prognostic score when compared with 10 other known prognostic signatures. Conclusions: The study developed a prognostic signature score with a propensity to detect non-EMT features, including epithelial cancer stem cell–related properties, thereby improving its potential to predict metastasis and poorer outcome in stage I–III patients. Clin Cancer Res; 22(3); 734–45. ©2015 AACR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-0143

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 45 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 42

Metadata

Authors
Schell, M. J., Yang, M., Missiaglia, E., Delorenzi, M., Soneson, C., Yue, B., Nebozhyn, M. V., Loboda, A., Bloom, G., & Yeatman, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
  • 2Gibbs Cancer Center & Research Institute, Spartanburg, South Carolina.
  • SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Schell, Michael J.
  • Yeatman, Timothy J.
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2016-01-31
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
734-745
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2188527201
Cited by
42
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (U01CA157960, P30CA076292)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
Keywords
colorectal cancer, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, gene expression signatures, metastasis prediction, prognostic score, principal component analysis, cancer stem cells, Ras signaling, mitochondrial metabolism, microsatellite instability, stage III colorectal cancer, overall survival
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis, Colorectal Neoplasms, Reproducibility of Results, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Cluster Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Gene Expression Profiling, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Microsatellite Instability, Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition, Transcriptome, Patient Outcome Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review