Cited by 90Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

RASA1 and NF1 are Preferentially Co-Mutated and Define A Distinct Genetic Subset of Smoking-Associated Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinomas Sensitive to MEK Inhibition

Open access
Hayashi, Takuo, Desmeules, Patrice, Smith, Roger S., Drilon, Alexander, Somwar, Romel, Ladanyi, Marc·2018·Clinical Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: Ras-GTPase–activating proteins (RasGAP), notably NF1 and RASA1, mediate negative control of the RAS/MAPK pathway. We evaluated clinical and molecular characteristics of non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) with RASA1 mutations in comparison with NF1-mutated cases. Experimental Design: Large genomic datasets of NSCLC [MSK-IMPACT dataset at MSKCC (n = 2,004), TCGA combined lung cancer dataset (n = 1,144)] were analyzed to define concurrent mutations and clinical features of RASA1-mutated NSCLCs. Functional studies were performed using immortalized human bronchial epithelial cells (HBEC) and NSCLC lines with truncating mutations in RASA1, NF1, or both. Results: Overall, approximately 2% of NSCLCs had RASA1-truncating mutations, and this alteration was statistically, but not completely, mutually exclusive with known activating EGFR (P = 0.02) and KRAS (P = 0.02) mutations. Unexpectedly, RASA1-truncating mutations had a strong tendency to co-occur with NF1-truncating mutations (P < 0.001). Furthermore, all patients (16/16) with concurrent RASA1/NF1-truncating mutations lacked other known lung cancer drivers. Knockdown of RASA1 in HBECs activated signaling downstream of RAS and promoted cell growth. Conversely, restoration of RASA1 expression in RASA1-mutated cells reduced MAPK and PI3K signaling. Although growth of cell lines with inactivation of only one of these two RasGAPs showed moderate and variable sensitivity to inhibitors of MEK or PI3K, cells with concurrent RASA1/NF1 mutations were profoundly more sensitive (IC50: 0.040 μmol/L trametinib). Finally, simultaneous genetic silencing of RASA1 and NF1 sensitized both HBECs and NSCLC cells to MEK inhibition. Conclusions: Cancer genomic and functional data nominate concurrent RASA1/NF1 loss-of-function mutations as a strong mitogenic driver in NSCLC, which may sensitize to trametinib. Clin Cancer Res; 24(6); 1436–47. ©2017 AACR. See related commentary by Kitajima and Barbie, p. 1243

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-2343

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In some LUAD and LUSC, NF1 and RASA1 co-mutations create dependence on MEK-ERK signaling and greater sensitivity to MEK inhibitors.

    “co-mutations in NF1 and RASA1, encoding two critical RAS pathway GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), drive addiction to the MEK–ERK signaling axis and confer enhanced sensitivity to MEK inhibitors in a subset of both LUAD and LUSC171, 172.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayashi, T., Desmeules, P., Smith, R. S., Drilon, A., Somwar, R., & Ladanyi, M.
Affiliations
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2018-03-14
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
1436-1447
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2767780132
Cited by
90
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P01CA129243, P30CA008748)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
RASA1, neurofibromatosis type 1, non-small cell lung cancer, Ras GTPase-activating protein, RAS/MAPK pathway, MEK inhibition, trametinib, co-occurring mutations, smoking, EGFR, KRAS, PI3K signaling, drug sensitivity, loss-of-function mutations, bronchial epithelial cells, tumor suppressor
MeSH terms
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Cell Survival, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Mutation, Smoking, Signal Transduction, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Apoptosis, p120 GTPase Activating Protein, Neurofibromin 1, Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Cell Proliferation, Cell Cycle Checkpoints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review