Cited by 275Protein Degradation and InhibitorsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysChemical Synthesis and Analysis

Exploring Targeted Degradation Strategy for Oncogenic KRASG12C

Open access
Zeng, Mei, Xiong, Yuan, Safaee, Nozhat, Nowak, Radosław P., Donovan, Katherine A., Yuan, Christine J., Nabet, Behnam, Gero, Thomas W. +11 more·2020·Cell Chemical Biology

Abstract

KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene found in pancreatic, colorectal, and lung cancers. Although it has been challenging to identify targeted therapies for cancers harboring KRAS mutations, KRAS G12C can be targeted by small-molecule inhibitors that form covalent bonds with cysteine 12 (C12). Here, we designed a library of C12-directed covalent degrader molecules (PROTACs) and subjected them to a rigorous evaluation process to rapidly identify a lead compound. Our lead degrader successfully engaged CRBN in cells, bound KRAS G12C in vitro, induced CRBN/KRAS G12C dimerization, and degraded GFP-KRAS G12C in reporter cells in a CRBN-dependent manner. However, it failed to degrade endogenous KRAS G12C in pancreatic and lung cancer cells. Our data suggest that inability of the lead degrader to effectively poly-ubiquitinate endogenous KRAS G12C underlies the lack of activity. We discuss challenges for achieving targeted KRAS G12C degradation and proposed several possible solutions which may lead to efficient degradation of endogenous KRAS G12C.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.12.006

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In KRASG12C mutants, small molecules covalently bound to the mutant cystine bind more readily to GDP-bound KRAS proteins; this binding reduces the affinity between GTP and KRAS, thus preventing GEF from catalyzing the replacement of GDP with GTP, thereby locking the KRASG12C mutant in an inactivated state.

    “In KRASG12C mutants, small molecules covalently bound to the mutant cystine have been found to bind more readily to GDP-bound KRAS proteins. This binding reduces the affinity between GTP and KRAS, thus preventing GEF from catalyzing the replacement of GDP with GTP, thereby locking the KRASG12C mutant in an inactivated state.51”
  • These effects reduce affinity between GTP and KRAS, prevent GDP replacement by GTP through GEF catalysis, and lock KRAS mutants in inactive state.

    “These effects reduce the affinity between GTP and KRAS, prevent GDP from being replaced by GTP through GEF catalysis, and ultimately lock KRAS mutants in an inactive state.”
  • XY-4-88 (196) induces dimerization of CRBN-KRASG12C.

    “One compound, named XY-4-88 (196), displayed the ability to induce dimerization of CRBN-KRASG12C (Table 4).”
  • XY-4-88 fails to degrade endogenous KRASG12C and does not demonstrate a degradation-dependent phenotype.

    “However, despite its covalent binding to KRASG12C, XY-4-88 failed to degrade endogenous KRASG12C and did not demonstrate a degradation-dependent phenotype.51”
  • Zeng et al. developed XY-4-88, a covalent PROTAC based on ARS-1620 and thalidomide as the CRBN-recruiting ligand.

    “Zeng et al.124 initially developed a covalent PROTAC (XY-4-88) based on ARS-1620, a KRAS(G12C)-binding covalent warhead, and thalidomide as the CRBN-recruiting ligand124.”

    From PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue (2022) · cites this paper as [124]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeng, M., Xiong, Y., Safaee, N., Nowak, R. P., Donovan, K. A., Yuan, C. J., Nabet, B., Gero, T. W., Feru, F., Li, L., Gondi, S., Ombelets, L. J., Quan, C., Jänne, P. A., Kostic, M., Scott, D. A., Westover, K. D., Fischer, E. S., & Gray, N. S.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Westover, Kenneth D.
  • Fischer, Eric S.
  • Gray, Nathanael S.
Venue
Cell Chemical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
19-31.e6
ISSN
  • 2451-9448 (ISSN-L)
  • 2451-9456
OpenAlex
W2998586415
Cited by
275
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 37 · 2014: 1
FWCI
10.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell chemical biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • Novartis
  • Sanofi
  • AbbVie
  • Astellas Pharma US
  • Boehringer Ingelheim
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (CPRIT RP170373, DRR-50–18)
  • Stand Up To Cancer (SU2C-AACR-DT17-15)
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Daiichi-Sankyo
  • Pfizer
  • Entertainment Industry Foundation
  • American Cancer Society (PF-17-010-01-CDD)
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A.
  • American Association for Cancer Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
KRAS G12C, targeted protein degradation, PROTACs, cereblon, small molecule inhibitors, ubiquitination, pancreatic cancer, lung cancer, oncogenic KRAS, lead compound identification
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Humans, Drug Design, Molecular Structure, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review