Cited by 175Phytoestrogen effects and researchEstrogen and related hormone effectsPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

Soy Isoflavone Supplementation for Breast Cancer Risk Reduction: A Randomized Phase II Trial

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Soy isoflavone consumption may protect against breast cancer development. We conducted a phase IIB trial of soy isoflavone supplementation to examine its effect on breast epithelial proliferation and other biomarkers in the healthy high-risk breast. One hundred and twenty-six consented women underwent a random fine-needle aspiration (rFNA); those with 4,000 or more epithelial cells were randomized to a double-blind 6-month intervention of mixed soy isoflavones (PTIG-2535) or placebo, followed by repeat rFNA. Cells were examined for Ki-67 labeling index and atypia. Expression of 28 genes related to proliferation, apoptosis, and estrogenic effect was measured using quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR. Hormone and protein levels were measured in nipple aspirate fluid (NAF). All statistical tests were two-sided. Ninety-eight women were evaluable for Ki-67 labeling index. In 49 treated women, the median Ki-67 labeling index was 1.18 at entry and 1.12 post intervention, whereas in 49 placebo subjects, it was 0.97 and 0.92 (P for between-group change: 0.32). Menopausal stratification yielded similar results between groups, but within premenopausal soy-treated women, Ki-67 labeling index increased from 1.71 to 2.18 (P = 0.04). We saw no treatment effect on cytologic atypia or NAF parameters. There were significant increases in the expression of 14 of 28 genes within the soy, but not the control group, without significant between-group differences. Plasma genistein values showed excellent compliance. A 6-month intervention of mixed soy isoflavones in healthy, high-risk adult Western women did not reduce breast epithelial proliferation, suggesting a lack of efficacy for breast cancer prevention and a possible adverse effect in premenopausal women. Cancer Prev Res; 5(2); 309–19. ©2012 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-11-0251

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among all studies, there was report of only one case of breast cancer recurrence that occurred in a soy-allocated subject; and two new cases of breast cancer and one case of endometrial cancer among soy allocated subjects compared to five in control subjects.

    “Amongst all the studies, there was report of only one case of breast cancer recurrence that occurred in a soy-allocated subject [142]; and two new cases of breast cancer and one case of endometrial cancer among soy allocated subjects compared to five in the control subjects [132,145,147,160].”

    From Soy, Red Clover, and Isoflavones and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review (2013) · cites this paper as [160]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • One RCT found consumption of an isoflavone supplement (235mg daily) for six months had no effect on Ki-67 labeling index compared to placebo, although there was a significant decrease in both treatment and placebo groups compared to baseline.

    “On the other hand, a recent study found that consumption of an isoflavone supplement (235mg daily) for six months had no effect on Ki-67 labeling index compared to placebo, although there was a significant decrease in both treatment and placebo groups compared to baseline [160].”

    From Soy, Red Clover, and Isoflavones and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review (2013) · cites this paper as [160]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. [1]Fisher B Costantino JP Wickerham DL Cecchini RS Cronin WM Robidoux A Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: current status of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study J Natl Cancer Inst 2005 97 22 1652 62 16288118
  2. [2]Vogel VG Costantino JP Wickerham DL Cronin WM Cecchini RS Atkins JN Effects of tamoxifen vs raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes: the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial JAMA 2006 295 23 2727 41 16754727
  3. [3]Port ER Montgomery LL Heerdt AS Borgen PI Patient reluctance toward tamoxifen use for breast cancer primary prevention Ann Surg Oncol 2001 8 7 580 5 11508619
  4. [4]Tchou J Hou N Rademaker A Jordan VC Morrow M Acceptance of tamoxifen chemoprevention by physicians and women at risk Cancer 2004 100 9 1800 6 15112259
  5. [5]Yen TW Hunt KK Mirza NQ Thomas ES Singletary SE Babiera GV Physician recommendations regarding tamoxifen and patient utilization of tamoxifen after surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ Cancer 2004 100 5 942 9 14983489
  6. [6]Trock BJ Hilakivi-Clarke L Clarke R Meta-analysis of soy intake and breast cancer risk J Natl Cancer Inst 2006 98 7 459 71 16595782
  7. [7]Dong JY Qin LQ Soy isoflavones consumption and risk of breast cancer incidence or recurrence: a meta-analysis of prospective studies Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010 21113655
  8. [8]Shu XO Zheng Y Cai H Gu K Chen Z Zheng W Soy food intake and breast cancer survival JAMA 2009 302 22 2437 43 19996398 PMC2874068
  9. [9]Messina M Hilakivi-Clarke L Early intake appears to be the key to the proposed protective effects of soy intake against breast cancer Nutr Cancer 2009 61 6 792 8 20155618
  10. [10]Allred CD Ju YH Allred KF Chang J Helferich WG Dietary genistin stimulates growth of estrogen-dependent breast cancer tumors similar to that observed with genistein Carcinogenesis 2001 22 10 1667 73 11577007
  11. [11]Allred CD Allred KF Ju YH Clausen LM Doerge DR Schantz SL Dietary genistein results in larger MNU-induced, estrogen-dependent mammary tumors following ovariectomy of Sprague-Dawley rats Carcinogenesis 2004 25 2 211 8 14578162
  12. [12]Fabian CJ Kimler BF Zalles CM Klemp JR Kamel S Zeiger S Short-Term Breast Cancer Prediction by Random Periareolar Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and the Gail Risk Model J Natl Cancer Inst 2000 92 15 1217 27 10922407
  13. [13]Mansoor I Zalles C Zahid F Gossage K Levenson RM Rimm DL Fine-needle aspiration of follicular adenoma versus parathyroid adenoma: the utility of multispectral imaging in differentiating lesions with subtle cytomorphologic differences Cancer 2008 114 1 22 6 18085636
  14. [14]Khan SA Lankes HA Patil DB Bryk M Hou N Ivancic D Ductal lavage is an inefficient method of biomarker measurement in high-risk women Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2009 2 3 265 73 19223577 PMC2728458
  15. [15]Masood S Frykberg ER McLellan GL Scalapino MC Mitchum DG Bullard JB Prospective evaluation of radiologically directed fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions Cancer 1990 66 1480 7 2169989
  16. [16]The uniform approach to breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy. NIH Consensus Development Conference Am J Surg 1997 174 4 371 85 9337157
  17. [18]Banerjee S Li Y Wang Z Sarkar FH Multi-targeted therapy of cancer by genistein Cancer Lett 2008 269 2 226 42 18492603 PMC2575691
  18. [19]Dip R Lenz S Antignac JP Le BB Gmuender H Naegeli H Global gene expression profiles induced by phytoestrogens in human breast cancer cells Endocr Relat Cancer 2008 15 1 161 73 18310284
  19. [20]Ma XJ Salunga R Tuggle JT Gaudet J Enright E McQuary P Gene expression profiles of human breast cancer progression Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003 100 10 5974 9 12714683 PMC156311
  20. [21]Gamache PH Acworth IN Analysis of phytoestrogens and polyphenols in plasma, tissue, and urine using HPLC with coulometric array detection Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1998 217 3 274 80 9492335
  21. [22]Franke AA Custer LJ High-performance liquid chromatographic assay of isoflavonoids and coumestrol from human urine J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl 1994 662 1 47 60 7894693
  22. [23]Rotti K Stevens J Watson D Longcope C Estriol concentrations in plasma of normal, non-pregnant women Steroids 1975 25 6 807 16 1171542
  23. [24]Chatterton RT Jr Khan SA Heinz R Ivancic D Lee O Patterns of sex steroid hormones in nipple aspirate fluid during the menstrual cycle and after menopause in relation to serum concentrations Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010 19 1 275 9 20056648
  24. [25]Chatterton RT Jr Geiger AS Khan SA Helenowski IB Jovanovic BD Gann PH Variation in estradiol, estradiol precursors, and estrogen-related products in nipple aspirate fluid from normal premenopausal women Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004 13 6 928 35 15184248
  25. [26]Maskarinec G Watts K Kagihara J Hebshi SM Franke AA Urinary isoflavonoid excretion is similar after consuming soya milk and miso soup in Japanese-American women Br J Nutr 2008 100 2 424 9 18275624 PMC2706912
  26. [27]Setchell KD Cole SJ Method of defining equol-producer status and its frequency among vegetarians J Nutr 2006 136 8 2188 93 16857839
  27. [28]Kurahashi N Iwasaki M Sasazuki S Otani T Inoue M Tsugane S Soy product and isoflavone consumption in relation to prostate cancer in Japanese men Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007 16 3 538 45 17337648
  28. [29]Hargreaves DF Potten CS Harding C Shaw LE Morton MS Roberts SA Two-week dietary soy supplementation has an estrogenic effect on normal premenopausal breast Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1999 84 11 4017 24 10566643
  29. [30]Wood CE Hester JM Appt SE Geisinger KR Cline JM Estrogen effects on epithelial proliferation and benign proliferative lesions in the postmenopausal primate mammary gland Lab Invest 2008 88 9 938 48 18607345 PMC2691895
  30. [31]Wood CE Appt SE Clarkson TB Franke AA Lees CJ Doerge DR Effects of high-dose soy isoflavones and equol on reproductive tissues in female cynomolgus monkeys Biol Reprod 2006 75 3 477 86 16723506
  31. [32]Khan QJ Kimler BF Clark J Metheny T Zalles CM Fabian CJ Ki-67 expression in benign breast ductal cells obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005 14 4 786 9 15824144
  32. [33]Burger HG Dudley EC Robertson DM Dennerstein L Hormonal changes in the menopause transition Recent Prog Horm Res 2002 57 257 75 12017547
  33. [34]Plymate SR Moore DE Cheng CY Bardin CW Southworth MB Levinski MJ Sex hormone-binding globulin changes during the menstrual cycle J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1985 61 5 993 6 2413065
  34. [35]Duncan AM Underhill KE Xu X Lavalleur J Phipps WR Kurzer MS Modest hormonal effects of soy isoflavones in postmenopausal women J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999 84 10 3479 84 10522983
  35. [36]Hargreaves DF Potten CS Harding C Shaw LE Morton MS Roberts SA Two-week dietary soy supplementation has an estrogenic effect on normal premenopausal breast J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999 84 11 4017 24 10566643
  36. [37]Xu L Ding Y Catalona WJ Yang XJ Anderson WF Jovanovic B MEK4function, genistein treatment, and invasion of human prostate cancer cells J Natl Cancer Inst 2009 101 16 1141 55 19638505 PMC2728746
  37. [38]Korde LA Wu AH Fears T Nomura AM West DW Kolonel LN Childhood soy intake and breast cancer risk in Asian American women Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009 18 4 1050 9 19318430

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khan, S. A., Chatterton, R. T., Michel, N., Bryk, M., Lee, O., Ivancic, D., Heinz, R., Zalles, C. M., Helenowski, I. B., Jovanovic, B. D., Franke, A. A., Bosland, M. C., Wang, J., Hansen, N. M., Bethke, K. P., Dew, A., Coomes, M., & Bergan, R. C.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Khan, Seema A.
Venue
Cancer Prevention Research
Published
2012-02-01
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
309-319
ISSN
  • 1940-6207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6215
OpenAlex
W2140424776
Cited by
175
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 12
FWCI
13.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Prevention Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01cn35157-7-0-1)
  • National Cancer Institute (N01 CN035157, N01CN35157, P30CA071789)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Keywords
soy isoflavones, breast cancer prevention, Ki-67 proliferation index, nipple aspirate fluid, high-risk women, premenopausal women, genistein, gene expression, estrogenic effects, apoptosis, dietary supplementation
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast Neoplasms, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Isoflavones, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Glycine max, Dietary Supplements, Risk Reduction Behavior, Biopsy, Fine-Needle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review