Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 686

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Combination Epigenetic Therapy Has Efficacy in Patients with Refractory Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Open access
Juergens, Rosalyn A., Wrangle, John, Vendetti, Frank P., Murphy, Sara C., Zhao, Ming, Coleman, Barbara, Sebree, Rosa, Rodgers, Kristen, Hooker, Craig M., Franco, Noreli, Lee, Beverly, Tsai, Salina, Delgado, Igor Espinoza, Rudek, Michelle A., Belinsky, Steven A., Herman, James G., Baylin, Stephen B., Brock, Malcolm V., Rudin, Charles M.·2011·Cancer Discovery

Abstract

Epigenetic alterations are strongly associated with the development of cancer. We conducted a phase I/II trial of combined epigenetic therapy with azacitidine and entinostat, inhibitors of DNA methylation and histone deacetylation, respectively, in extensively pretreated patients with recurrent metastatic non–small cell lung cancer. This therapy is well tolerated, and objective responses were observed, including a complete response and a partial response in a patient who remains alive and without disease progression approximately 2 years after completing protocol therapy. Median survival in the entire cohort was 6.4 months (95% CI 3.8–9.2), comparing favorably with existing therapeutic options. Demethylation of a set of 4 epigenetically silenced genes known to be associated with lung cancer was detectable in serial blood samples in these patients and was associated with improved progression-free (P = 0.034) and overall survival (P = 0.035). Four of 19 patients had major objective responses to subsequent anticancer therapies given immediately after epigenetic therapy. Significance: This study demonstrates that combined epigenetic therapy with low-dose azacitidine and entinostat results in objective, durable responses in patients with solid tumors and defines a blood-based biomarker that correlates with clinical benefit. Cancer Discovery; 1(7); 598–607. ©2011 AACR. Read the Commentary on this article by Rodríguez-Paredes and Esteller, p. 557 This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 539

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-11-0214

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 686

Metadata

Authors
Juergens, R. A., Wrangle, J., Vendetti, F. P., Murphy, S. C., Zhao, M., Coleman, B., Sebree, R., Rodgers, K., Hooker, C. M., Franco, N., Lee, B., Tsai, S., Delgado, I. E., Rudek, M. A., Belinsky, S. A., Herman, J. G., Baylin, S. B., Brock, M. V., & Rudin, C. M.
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2011-12-01
Volume
1
Issue
7
Pages
598-607
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W2141476381
Cited by
686
References
52
FWCI
17.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combination Epigenetic Therapy Has Efficacy in Patients with Refractory Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-11-0214
The paper
Juergens, R. A., Wrangle, J., Vendetti, F. P., Murphy, S. C., Zhao, M., Coleman, B., Sebree, R., Rodgers, K., Hooker, C. M., Franco, N., Lee, B., Tsai, S., Delgado, I. E., Rudek, M. A., Belinsky, S. A., Herman, J. G., Baylin, S. B., Brock, M. V., & Rudin, C. M. (2011). Combination Epigenetic Therapy Has Efficacy in Patients with Refractory Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancer Discovery. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-11-0214

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.