Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Identifies Multiclonal Heterogeneity of BRCA2 Reversion Mutations Associated with Resistance to PARP Inhibitors

Open access
Quigley, David, Alumkal, Joshi J., Wyatt, Alexander W., Kothari, Vishal, Foye, Adam, Lloyd, Paul, Aggarwal, Rahul, Kim, Won, Lu, Eric, Schwartzman, Jacob, Beja, Kevin, Annala, Matti, Das, Rajdeep, Diolaiti, Morgan, Pritchard, Colin, Thomas, George, Tomlins, Scott, Knudsen, Karen, Lord, Christopher J., Ryan, Charles, Youngren, Jack, Beer, Tomasz M., Ashworth, Alan, Small, Eric J., Feng, Felix Y.·2017·Cancer Discovery

Abstract

Approximately 20% of metastatic prostate cancers harbor mutations in genes required for DNA repair by homologous recombination repair (HRR) such as BRCA2. HRR defects confer synthetic lethality to PARP inhibitors (PARPi) such as olaparib and talazoparib. In ovarian or breast cancers, olaparib resistance has been associated with HRR restoration, including by BRCA2 mutation reversion. Whether similar mechanisms operate in prostate cancer, and could be detected in liquid biopsies, is unclear. Here, we identify BRCA2 reversion mutations associated with olaparib and talazoparib resistance in patients with prostate cancer. Analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) reveals reversion mutation heterogeneity not discernable from a single solid-tumor biopsy and potentially allows monitoring for the emergence of PARPi resistance. Significance: The mechanisms of clinical resistance to PARPi in DNA repair–deficient prostate cancer have not been described. Here, we show BRCA2 reversion mutations in patients with prostate cancer with metastatic disease who developed resistance to talazoparib and olaparib. Furthermore, we show that PARPi resistance is highly multiclonal and that cfDNA allows monitoring for PARPi resistance. Cancer Discov; 7(9); 999–1005. ©2017 AACR. See related commentary by Domchek, p. 937. See related article by Kondrashova et al., p. 984. See related article by Goodall et al., p. 1006. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 920

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-17-0146

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Quigley, D., Alumkal, J. J., Wyatt, A. W., Kothari, V., Foye, A., Lloyd, P., Aggarwal, R., Kim, W., Lu, E., Schwartzman, J., Beja, K., Annala, M., Das, R., Diolaiti, M., Pritchard, C., Thomas, G., Tomlins, S., Knudsen, K., Lord, C. J., Ryan, C., Youngren, J., Beer, T. M., Ashworth, A., Small, E. J., & Feng, F. Y.
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2017-08-31
Volume
7
Issue
9
Pages
999-1005
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W2608211931
Cited by
273
References
9
FWCI
13.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Identifies Multiclonal Heterogeneity of BRCA2 Reversion Mutations Associated with Resistance to PARP Inhibitors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-17-0146
The paper
Quigley, D., Alumkal, J. J., Wyatt, A. W., Kothari, V., Foye, A., Lloyd, P., Aggarwal, R., Kim, W., Lu, E., Schwartzman, J., Beja, K., Annala, M., Das, R., Diolaiti, M., Pritchard, C., Thomas, G., Tomlins, S., Knudsen, K., Lord, C. J., . . . Feng, F. Y. (2017). Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Identifies Multiclonal Heterogeneity of BRCA2 Reversion Mutations Associated with Resistance to PARP Inhibitors. Cancer Discovery. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-17-0146

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.