Cited by 95Melanoma and MAPK PathwaysChromatin Remodeling and CancerProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases

MAPK Pathway Suppression Unmasks Latent DNA Repair Defects and Confers a Chemical Synthetic Vulnerability in BRAF-, NRAS -, and NF1 -Mutant Melanomas

Open access
Maertens, Ophélia, Kuzmickas, Ryan, Manchester, Haley E., Emerson, Chloe E., Gavin, Alessandra G., Guild, Caroline J., Wong, Terence C., De Raedt, Thomas +7 more·2019·Cancer Discovery

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Although the majority of BRAF-mutant melanomas respond to BRAF/MEK inhibitors, these agents are not typically curative. Moreover, they are largely ineffective in NRAS- and NF1-mutant tumors. Here we report that genetic and chemical suppression of HDAC3 potently cooperates with MAPK pathway inhibitors in all three RAS pathway–driven tumors. Specifically, we show that entinostat dramatically enhances tumor regression when combined with BRAF/MEK inhibitors, in both models that are sensitive or relatively resistant to these agents. Interestingly, MGMT expression predicts responsiveness and marks tumors with latent defects in DNA repair. BRAF/MEK inhibitors enhance these defects by suppressing homologous recombination genes, inducing a BRCA-like state; however, addition of entinostat triggers the concomitant suppression of nonhomologous end-joining genes, resulting in a chemical synthetic lethality caused by excessive DNA damage. Together, these studies identify melanomas with latent DNA repair defects, describe a promising drug combination that capitalizes on these defects, and reveal a tractable therapeutic biomarker. Significance: BRAF/MEK inhibitors are not typically curative in BRAF-mutant melanomas and are ineffective in NRAS- and NF1-mutant tumors. We show that HDAC inhibitors dramatically enhance the efficacy of BRAF/MEK inhibitors in sensitive and insensitive RAS pathway–driven melanomas by coordinately suppressing two DNA repair pathways, and identify a clinical biomarker that predicts responsiveness. See related commentary by Lombard et al., p. 469. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 453

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-18-0879

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HDAC inhibitors have been considered for usage in combinatorial therapies for several cancers including melanoma.

    “HDAC inhibitors have been considered for usage in combinatorial therapies for several cancers including melanoma47,65–67.”
  • BRAF/MEK inhibitors plus entinostat synergize to induce DNA damage and suppress DDR genes involved in HR and NHEJ.

    “Interestingly, BRAF/MEK inhibitors in combination with entinostat (a preferred HDAC1/2/3 inhibitor) synergize to induce DNA damage and suppress expression of DDR genes involved in both HR and NHEJ (Maertens et al., 2019).”

    From HDACs and the epigenetic plasticity of cancer cells: target the complexity (2022) · cites this paper as Maertens et al., 2019

  • Depletion of HDAC3 (but not HDAC1/2 or 6) cooperates with BRAF/MEK inhibitors to kill melanoma cells.

    “Depletion of HDAC3 (but not HDAC1/2 or 6) potently cooperates with these inhibitors to kill melanoma cells.”

    From HDACs and the epigenetic plasticity of cancer cells: target the complexity (2022) · cites this paper as Maertens et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maertens, O., Kuzmickas, R., Manchester, H. E., Emerson, C. E., Gavin, A. G., Guild, C. J., Wong, T. C., De Raedt, T., Bowman-Colin, C., Hatchi, E., Garraway, L. A., Flaherty, K. T., Pathania, S., Elledge, S. J., & Cichowski, K.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • 1Genetics Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2019-04-01
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
526-545
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W2913242533
Cited by
95
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 5
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Cancer InstituteHHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) (R01CA111754)
  • Ludwig center at Harvard
  • Children's Hospital Boston
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
Keywords
melanoma, BRAF-mutant melanoma, NRAS-mutant melanoma, MAPK pathway inhibitors, entinostat, HDAC3 inhibition, DNA repair deficiency, MGMT expression, homologous recombination, non-homologous end joining, drug combination therapy, predictive biomarkers
MeSH terms
DNA Repair, Humans, Melanoma, Genes, ras, MAP Kinase Kinase Kinases, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review