Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transcriptomic Profiling of the Tumor Microenvironment Reveals Distinct Subgroups of Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer: Data from a Randomized Phase III Trial

Open access
Hakimi, A. Ari, Voss, Martin H., Kuo, Fengshen, Sanchez, Alejandro, Liu, Ming, Nixon, Briana G., Vuong, Lynda, Ostrovnaya, Irina, Chen, Ying-Bei, Reuter, Victor, Riaz, Nadeem, Cheng, Yuan, Patel, Parul, Marker, Mahtab, Reising, Albert, Li, Ming O., Chan, Timothy A., Motzer, Robert J.·2019·Cancer Discovery

Abstract

Metastasis remains the main reason for renal cell carcinoma (RCC)–associated mortality. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) impart clinical benefit for most patients with RCC, but the determinants of response are poorly understood. We report an integrated genomic and transcriptomic analysis of patients with metastatic clear cell RCC (ccRCC) treated with TKI therapy and identify predictors of response. Patients in the COMPARZ phase III trial received first-line sunitinib or pazopanib with comparable efficacy. RNA-based analyses revealed four distinct molecular subgroups associated with response and survival. Characterization of these subgroups identified mutation profiles, angiogenesis, and macrophage infiltration programs to be powerful predictors of outcome with TKI therapy. Notably, predictors differed by the type of TKI received. Our study emphasizes the clinical significance of angiogenesis and immune tumor microenvironment and suggests that the critical effects its various aspects have on TKI efficacy vary by agent. This has broad implications for optimizing precision treatment of RCC. Significance: The determinants of response to TKI therapy in metastatic ccRCC remain unknown. Our study demonstrates that key angiogenic and immune profiles of the tumor microenvironment may affect TKI response. These findings have the potential to inform treatment personalization in patients with RCC. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 453

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-18-0957

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Hakimi, A. A., Voss, M. H., Kuo, F., Sanchez, A., Liu, M., Nixon, B. G., Vuong, L., Ostrovnaya, I., Chen, Y.-B., Reuter, V., Riaz, N., Cheng, Y., Patel, P., Marker, M., Reising, A., Li, M. O., Chan, T. A., & Motzer, R. J.
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2019-04-01
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
510-525
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W2910857268
Cited by
258
References
50
FWCI
24.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcriptomic Profiling of the Tumor Microenvironment Reveals Distinct Subgroups of Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer: Data from a Randomized Phase III Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-18-0957
The paper
Hakimi, A. A., Voss, M. H., Kuo, F., Sanchez, A., Liu, M., Nixon, B. G., Vuong, L., Ostrovnaya, I., Chen, Y.-B., Reuter, V., Riaz, N., Cheng, Y., Patel, P., Marker, M., Reising, A., Li, M. O., Chan, T. A., & Motzer, R. J. (2019). Transcriptomic Profiling of the Tumor Microenvironment Reveals Distinct Subgroups of Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer: Data from a Randomized Phase III Trial. Cancer Discovery. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-18-0957

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.