Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 111

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Loss-of-Function but Not Gain-of-Function Properties of Mutant TP53 Are Critical for the Proliferation, Survival, and Metastasis of a Broad Range of Cancer Cells

Wang, Zilu, Burigotto, Matteo, Ghetti, Sabrina, Vaillant, François, Tan, Tao, Capaldo, Bianca D., Palmieri, Michelle, Hirokawa, Yumiko, Tai, Lin, Simpson, Daniel S., Chang, Catherine, Huang, Allan Shuai, Lieschke, Elizabeth, Diepstraten, Sarah T., Kaloni, Deeksha, Riffkin, Chris, Huang, David C.S., Li Wai Suen, Connie S.N., Garnham, Alexandra L., Gibbs, Peter, Visvader, Jane E., Sieber, Oliver M., Herold, Marco J., Fava, Luca L., Kelly, Gemma L., Strasser, Andreas·2024·Cancer Discovery

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Mutations in the tumor suppressor TP53 cause cancer and impart poor chemotherapeutic responses, reportedly through loss-of-function, dominant-negative effects and gain-of-function (GOF) activities. The relative contributions of these attributes is unknown. We found that removal of 12 different TP53 mutants with reported GOFs by CRISPR/Cas9 did not impact proliferation and response to chemotherapeutics of 15 human cancer cell lines and colon cancer–derived organoids in culture. Moreover, removal of mutant TP53/TRP53 did not impair growth or metastasis of human cancers in immune-deficient mice or growth of murine cancers in immune-competent mice. DepMap mining revealed that removal of 158 different TP53 mutants had no impact on the growth of 391 human cancer cell lines. In contrast, CRISPR-mediated restoration of wild-type TP53 extinguished the growth of human cancer cells in vitro. These findings demonstrate that LOF but not GOF effects of mutant TP53/TRP53 are critical to sustain expansion of many tumor types. Significance: This study provides evidence that removal of mutant TP53, thereby deleting its reported GOF activities, does not impact the survival, proliferation, metastasis, or chemotherapy responses of cancer cells. Thus, approaches that abrogate expression of mutant TP53 or target its reported GOF activities are unlikely to exert therapeutic impact in cancer. See related commentary by Lane, p. 211 . This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 201

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-0402

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Aylon, 2007, Living with p53, dying of p53, Cell, 130, 597, 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.005 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Janic, 2018, DNA repair processes are critical mediators of p53-dependent tumor suppression, Nat Med, 24, 947, 10.1038/s41591-018-0043-5 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Kastenhuber, 2017, Putting p53 in context, Cell, 170, 1062, 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.028 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Vousden, 2007, p53 in health and disease, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 8, 275, 10.1038/nrm2147 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Vousden, 2005, P53 and prognosis: new insights and further complexity, Cell, 120, 7
  6. Oren, 2010, Mutant p53 gain-of-function in cancer, Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2, a001107, 10.1101/cshperspect.a001107 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Freed-Pastor, 2012, Mutant p53: one name, many proteins, Genes Dev, 26, 1268, 10.1101/gad.190678.112 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Aubrey, 2018, Mutant TRP53 exerts a target gene-selective dominant-negative effect to drive tumor development, Genes Dev, 32, 1420, 10.1101/gad.314286.118 · DOI
  9. Shchors, 2013, Using a preclinical mouse model of high-grade astrocytoma to optimize p53 restoration therapy, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 110, E1480, 10.1073/pnas.1219142110 · DOI
  10. McCormick, 2018, Targeting KRAS directly, Annu Rev Cancer Biol, 2, 81, 10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-050216-122010 · DOI
  11. Veggiani, 2019, Emerging drug development technologies targeting ubiquitination for cancer therapeutics, Pharmacol Ther, 199, 139, 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.03.003 · DOI
  12. Alexandrova, 2015, Improving survival by exploiting tumour dependence on stabilized mutant p53 for treatment, Nature, 523, 352, 10.1038/nature14430 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Panicker, 2010, Romidepsin (FK228/depsipeptide) controls growth and induces apoptosis in neuroblastoma tumor cells, Cell Cycle, 9, 1830, 10.4161/cc.9.9.11543 · DOI
  14. Aubrey, 2015, An inducible lentiviral guide RNA platform enables the identification of tumor-essential genes and tumor-promoting mutations in vivo, Cell Rep, 10, 1422, 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Liberti, 2016, The warburg effect: how does it benefit cancer cells?, Trends Biochem Sci, 41, 211, 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Hanahan, 2011, Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation, Cell, 144, 646, 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Cordani, 2020, Mutant p53-associated molecular mechanisms of ROS regulation in cancer ells, Biomolecules, 10, 361, 10.3390/biom10030361 · DOI
  18. Eriksson, 2017, Effect of mutant p53 proteins on glycolysis and mitochondrial metabolism, Mol Cell Biol, 37, e00328, 10.1128/MCB.00328-17 · DOI
  19. Fulda, 2010, Cellular stress responses: cell survival and cell death, Int J Cell Biol, 2010, 214074, 10.1155/2010/214074 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Sicari, 2019, Mutant p53 improves cancer cells’ resistance to endoplasmic reticulum stress by sustaining activation of the UPR regulator ATF6, Oncogene, 38, 6184, 10.1038/s41388-019-0878-3 · DOI
  21. Do, 2012, Mutant p53 cooperates with ETS2 to promote etoposide resistance, Genes Dev, 26, 830, 10.1101/gad.181685.111 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Wei, 2018, Etoposide-induced DNA damage affects multiple cellular pathways in addition to DNA damage response, Oncotarget, 9, 24122, 10.18632/oncotarget.24517 · DOI
  23. Vinall, 2022, Use of RNA-seq and a transgenic mouse model to identify genes which may contribute to mutant p53-driven prostate cancer initiation, Biology, 11, 218, 10.3390/biology11020218 · DOI
  24. Bossi, 2006, Mutant p53 gain of function: reduction of tumor malignancy of human cancer cell lines through abrogation of mutant p53 expression, Oncogene, 25, 304, 10.1038/sj.onc.1209026 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Ghetti, 2021, CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein-mediated knockin generation in hTERT-RPE1 cells, STAR Protoc, 2, 100407, 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100407 · DOI
  26. Adams, 1985, The c-myc oncogene driven by immunoglobulin enhancers induces lymphoid malignancy in transgenic mice, Nature, 318, 533, 10.1038/318533a0 · DOI · Paper page
  27. de Sousa e Melo, 2017, A distinct role for Lgr5(+) stem cells in primary and metastatic colon cancer, Nature, 543, 676, 10.1038/nature21713 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Redman-Rivera, 2021, Acquisition of aneuploidy drives mutant p53-associated gain-of-function phenotypes, Nat Commun, 12, 5184, 10.1038/s41467-021-25359-z · DOI
  29. Lang, 2004, Gain of function of a p53 hot spot mutation in a mouse model of Li-Fraumeni syndrome, Cell, 119, 861, 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.006 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Lin, 2019, Off-target toxicity is a common mechanism of action of cancer drugs undergoing clinical trials, Sci Transl Med, 11, eaaw8412, 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw8412 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Yan, 2019, Visualizing engrafted human cancer and therapy responses in immunodeficient zebrafish, Cell, 177, 1903, 10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Donehower, 1992, Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours, Nature, 356, 215, 10.1038/356215a0 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Jacks, 1994, Tumor spectrum analysis in p53-mutant mice, Curr Biol, 4, 1, 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00002-6 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Lowe, 1993, p53-dependent apoptosis modulates the cytotoxicity of anticancer agents, Cell, 74, 957, 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90719-7 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Strasser, 1994, DNA-damage can induce apoptosis in proliferating lymphoid-cells via p53-independent mechanisms inhibitable by Bcl-2, Cell, 79, 329, 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90201-1 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Liao, 2019, The R package Rsubread is easier, faster, cheaper and better for alignment and quantification of RNA sequencing reads, Nucleic Acids Res, 47, e47, 10.1093/nar/gkz114 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Liao, 2014, featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features, Bioinformatics, 30, 923, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Frankish, 2019, GENCODE reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes, Nucleic Acids Res, 47, D766, 10.1093/nar/gky955 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Ritchie, 2015, limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies, Nucleic Acids Res, 43, e47, 10.1093/nar/gkv007 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Robinson, 2010, edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data, Bioinformatics, 26, 139, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Robinson, 2010, A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data, Genome Biol, 11, R25, 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Phipson, 2016, Robust hyperparameter estimation protects against hypervariable genes and improves power to detect differential expression, Ann Appl Stat, 10, 946, 10.1214/16-AOAS920 · DOI · Paper page
  43. McCarthy, 2009, Testing significance relative to a fold-change threshold is a TREAT, Bioinformatics, 25, 765, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp053 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Wu, 2010, ROAST: rotation gene set tests for complex microarray experiments, Bioinformatics, 26, 2176, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq401 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Chu, 2016, Efficient CRISPR-mediated mutagenesis in primary immune cells using CrispRGold and a C57BL/6 Cas9 transgenic mouse line, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 113, 12514, 10.1073/pnas.1613884113 · DOI

Cited by

See all 111

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Z., Burigotto, M., Ghetti, S., Vaillant, F., Tan, T., Capaldo, B. D., Palmieri, M., Hirokawa, Y., Tai, L., Simpson, D. S., Chang, C., Huang, A. S., Lieschke, E., Diepstraten, S. T., Kaloni, D., Riffkin, C., Huang, D. C. S., Li Wai Suen, C. S. N., Garnham, A. L., Gibbs, P., Visvader, J. E., Sieber, O. M., Herold, M. J., Fava, L. L., Kelly, G. L., & Strasser, A.
Affiliations
  • 1The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.
  • 3Armenise-Harvard Laboratory of Cell Division, Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology – CIBIO, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2023-10-24
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
362-379
ISSN
  • 2159-8274
  • 2159-8290
Cited by
111
References
9
Language
en
Funders
  • Cancer Council Victoria (1086157, 1147328)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1086291, 2002618, 2001201, 101671, 1020363, 1102742, 1136119)
  • Fondazione AIRC per la ricerca sul cancro ETS (23560)
  • Giovanni Armenise-Harvard Foundation (CDA 2017)
  • Leukaemia Foundation (no number)
  • Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (7001-13)
  • Victorian Cancer Agency (MCRF 17028)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Loss-of-Function but Not Gain-of-Function Properties of Mutant TP53 Are Critical for the Proliferation, Survival, and Metastasis of a Broad Range of Cancer Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-0402
The paper
Wang, Z., Burigotto, M., Ghetti, S., Vaillant, F., Tan, T., Capaldo, B. D., Palmieri, M., Hirokawa, Y., Tai, L., Simpson, D. S., Chang, C., Huang, A. S., Lieschke, E., Diepstraten, S. T., Kaloni, D., Riffkin, C., Huang, D. C. S., Li Wai Suen, C. S. N., Garnham, A. L., . . . Strasser, A. (2024). Loss-of-Function but Not Gain-of-Function Properties of Mutant TP53 Are Critical for the Proliferation, Survival, and Metastasis of a Broad Range of Cancer Cells. Cancer Discovery. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-0402

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.