Cited by 52Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Specific functional effects of memantine treatment in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease

Doody, R., Wirth, Y., Schmitt, F., Möbius, H.J.·2004·Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders

Abstract

Treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) that combats progressive functional deterioration can improve the patient's quality of life and reduce caregiver burden. Memantine, a moderate affinity N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, reduces global deterioration in AD patients and provides cognitive and functional benefits relative to placebo. Two previous studies reported statistically significant benefits of memantine for overall functional ability on the Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory modified for severe dementia (ADCS-ADL(19)), Functional Assessment Staging, and G2 scale. The present study reports a single-item analysis of the ADL scales from the two trials and shows that patients treated with memantine demonstrated a numerical advantage over placebo on all items assessed. These results help to translate the positive effects of memantine into specific aspects of functional ability, information that is relevant to AD patients and their families as well as to researchers interested in the assessment of functional ability in AD clinical trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000079833

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In moderate and severe AD, short-term efficacy of memantine monotherapy compared with placebo is reported in several randomized controlled trials of 12 to 50 weeks duration and supported by meta-analyses.

    “In moderate and severe AD, short-term efficacy of memantine monotherapy compared with placebo is reported in several RCTs of 12 to 50 weeks duration and supported by meta-analyses.”

    From The Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Spectrum (2019) · cites this paper as [102]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doody, R., Wirth, Y., Schmitt, F., & Möbius, H. J.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Merz (Germany) (DE)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Venue
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2004
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
227-232
ISSN
  • 1420-8008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9824
OpenAlex
W2070531209
Cited by
52
References
16
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Merz Pharmaceuticals
  • National Institute on Aging (U19AG010483)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
memantine, Alzheimer's disease, functional capacity, activities of daily living, NMDA receptor antagonists, functional decline, caregiver burden, quality of life, clinical trial endpoints
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Double-Blind Method, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Memantine, Mental Status Schedule, Social Behavior, United States, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Caregivers, Cost of Illness, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Nootropic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review