The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pet Ownership and Health in Older Adults: Findings from a Survey of 2,551 Community-Based Australians Aged 60–64
Abstract
Background: It is commonly assumed that owning a pet provides older residents in the community with health benefits including improved physical health and psychological well-being. It has also been reported that pet owners are lower on neuroticism and higher on extraversion compared with those without pets. However, findings of research on this topic have been mixed with a number of researchers reporting that, for older people, there is little or no health benefit associated with pet ownership. Objective: To identify health benefits associated with pet ownership and pet caring responsibilities in a large sample of older community-based residents. Methods: Using survey information provided by 2,551 individuals aged between 60 and 64 years, we compared the sociodemographic attributes, mental and physical health measures, and personality traits of pet owners and non-owners. For 78.8% of these participants, we were also able to compare the health services used, based on information obtained from the national insurer on the number of general practitioner (GP) visits they made over a 12-month period. Results: Compared with non-owners, those with pets reported more depressive symptoms while female pet owners who were married also had poorer physical health. We found that caring for a pet was associated with negative health outcomes including more symptoms of depression, poorer physical health and higher rates of use of pain relief medication. No relationship was found between pet ownership and use of GP services. When we examined the personality traits of pet owners and carers, we found that men who cared for pets had higher extraversion scores. Our principal and unexpected finding, however, was that pet owners and carers reported higher levels of psychoticism as measured by the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Conclusions: We conclude that pet ownership confers no health benefits for this age group. Instead, those with pets have poorer mental and physical health and use more pain relief medication. Further, our study suggests that those with pets are less conforming to social norms as indicated by their higher levels of psychoticism.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Close to half of elderly individuals own pets.
“Two-thirds of all US households [1, 2] and close to half of elderly individuals own pets [3].”
From The Benefit of Pets and Animal-Assisted Therapy to the Health of Older Individuals (2014) · cites this paper as [3]
Citations
Cites
WARE, J. E., KOSINSKI, M., & KELLER, S. D. (1996) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 · Cited by 17,392
Mood and the mundane: Relations between daily life events and self-reported mood.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.296 · Cited by 784
Headey, B. (1999) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1023/a:1006892908532 · Cited by 201
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- 10.1037%2F%2F0022-3514.58.6.1081 · DOI
- 10.2307%2F352019 · DOI
- 10.1111%2Fj.1741-6612.2000.tb00166.x · DOI
- 10.1300%2FJ052v15n03_02 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037%2F%2F0882-7974.10.1.3 · DOI
- 10.1111%2Fj.1741-6612.2000.tb00167.x · DOI
- 10.1348%2F000712600161673 · DOI
- 10.1080%2F00224545.1993.9712145 · DOI
- 10.1037%2F%2F0022-3514.54.2.296 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016%2F0191-8869%2885%2990026-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016%2F0191-8869%2889%2990004-4 · DOI
- 10.1111%2Fj.1526-4610.1994.hed3409542.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Beetz, A., Uvnäs-Moberg, K., Julius, H., & Kotrschal, K. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00234 · Cited by 904
“Such studies, some of them large surveys with thousands of participants, were conducted by Garrity et al. (1989); Raina et al. (1999); Parslow et al. (2005); Siegel (1990); Stallones et al. (1990), and Winefield et al. (2008).”
Overgaauw, P. A. M., Vinke, C. M., van Hagen, M. A. E., & Lipman, L. J. A. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17113789 · Cited by 301
“Other studies failed to support earlier findings that pet ownership is associated with a reduced use of general practitioner services [113] or psychological or physical benefits on health for community dwelling older people [114].”
ResultThe human-companion animal bond: How humans benefit
Friedmann, E., & Son, H. (2009) · Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cvsm.2008.10.015 · Cited by 299
Pet Ownership and Cardiovascular Risk: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
Levine, G. N., Allen, K., Braun, L. T., Christian, H. E., Friedmann, E., Taubert, K. A., Thomas, S. A., Wells, D. L., & Lange, R. A. (2013) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e31829201e1 · Cited by 299
The Benefit of Pets and Animal-Assisted Therapy to the Health of Older Individuals
Cherniack, E. P., & Cherniack, A. R. (2014) · Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research · doi:10.1155/2014/623203 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Parslow, R. A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Rodgers, B., & Jacomb, P.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- Venue
- Gerontology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2004-12-06
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-47
- ISSN
- 0304-324X (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0003
- OpenAlex
- W2013866261
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 8.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gerontology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Green Space and Health
- Keywords
- pet ownership, older adults, health benefits of pets, depression, physical health, personality traits, psychoticism, extraversion, general practitioner visits, health care utilization, social norms, community-dwelling older adults
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animals, Domestic, Human-Animal Bond, Female, Health Status, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, New South Wales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review