Cited by 253Human-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesUrban Green Space and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pet Ownership and Health in Older Adults: Findings from a Survey of 2,551 Community-Based Australians Aged 60–64

Abstract

Background: It is commonly assumed that owning a pet provides older residents in the community with health benefits including improved physical health and psychological well-being. It has also been reported that pet owners are lower on neuroticism and higher on extraversion compared with those without pets. However, findings of research on this topic have been mixed with a number of researchers reporting that, for older people, there is little or no health benefit associated with pet ownership. Objective: To identify health benefits associated with pet ownership and pet caring responsibilities in a large sample of older community-based residents. Methods: Using survey information provided by 2,551 individuals aged between 60 and 64 years, we compared the sociodemographic attributes, mental and physical health measures, and personality traits of pet owners and non-owners. For 78.8% of these participants, we were also able to compare the health services used, based on information obtained from the national insurer on the number of general practitioner (GP) visits they made over a 12-month period. Results: Compared with non-owners, those with pets reported more depressive symptoms while female pet owners who were married also had poorer physical health. We found that caring for a pet was associated with negative health outcomes including more symptoms of depression, poorer physical health and higher rates of use of pain relief medication. No relationship was found between pet ownership and use of GP services. When we examined the personality traits of pet owners and carers, we found that men who cared for pets had higher extraversion scores. Our principal and unexpected finding, however, was that pet owners and carers reported higher levels of psychoticism as measured by the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Conclusions: We conclude that pet ownership confers no health benefits for this age group. Instead, those with pets have poorer mental and physical health and use more pain relief medication. Further, our study suggests that those with pets are less conforming to social norms as indicated by their higher levels of psychoticism.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000081433

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 10.1037%2F%2F0022-3514.58.6.1081 · DOI
  2. 10.2307%2F352019 · DOI
  3. 10.1111%2Fj.1741-6612.2000.tb00166.x · DOI
  4. 10.1300%2FJ052v15n03_02 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1037%2F%2F0882-7974.10.1.3 · DOI
  6. 10.1111%2Fj.1741-6612.2000.tb00167.x · DOI
  7. 10.1348%2F000712600161673 · DOI
  8. 10.1080%2F00224545.1993.9712145 · DOI
  9. 10.1037%2F%2F0022-3514.54.2.296 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016%2F0191-8869%2885%2990026-1 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016%2F0191-8869%2889%2990004-4 · DOI
  12. 10.1111%2Fj.1526-4610.1994.hed3409542.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Parslow, R. A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Rodgers, B., & Jacomb, P.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Venue
Gerontology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2004-12-06
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
40-47
ISSN
  • 0304-324X (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0003
OpenAlex
W2013866261
Cited by
253
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Green Space and Health
Keywords
pet ownership, older adults, health benefits of pets, depression, physical health, personality traits, psychoticism, extraversion, general practitioner visits, health care utilization, social norms, community-dwelling older adults
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Domestic, Human-Animal Bond, Female, Health Status, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, New South Wales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review