Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comorbidity and Physical Function: Results from the Aging and Longevity Study in the Sirente Geographic Area (ilSIRENTE Study)

Cesari, Matteo, Onder, Graziano, Russo, Andrea, Zamboni, Valentina, Barillaro, Christian, Ferrucci, Luigi, Pahor, Marco, Bernabei, Roberto, Landi, Francesco·2006·Gerontology

Abstract

Background: Physical function measures have gained increased importance in the evaluation of older persons. The presence of comorbidity is a major and growing issue in geriatrics. Objective: To evaluate the relationship between comorbidity and physical function in community-dwelling older persons. Methods: Data are from baseline evaluation of the ilSIRENTE study (n = 364). Physical performance was assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and the 4-meter walking test. Muscle strength was measured by hand-grip strength. Functional performance was assessed using Basic and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADLs and IADLs, respectively). Comorbidity was defined as ≧3 clinical conditions. Analyses of covariance and linear regressions were performed to evaluate the relationship between comorbidity and physical function. Results: The mean age of participants was 85.9 (SD = 4.9) years. About one third (37.4%) of participants reported ≧3 clinical conditions. Participants with comorbidity had significantly worse results in all the physical function tests. Participants with comorbidity had significantly lower adjusted results for the 4-meter walking test (0.444 m/s) and the SPPB score (6.131) compared to those without comorbidity (0.531 m/s and 7.221; all p = 0.001, respectively). Participants with comorbidity were more IADL-impaired (3.152) than participants without comorbidity (2.767; p = 0.04). No significant association of ADLs and hand-grip strength with comorbidity was reported. Similar strengths of association for the 4-meter walking test (per SD increase, β = –0.280; p = 0.001) and the SPPB (per SD increase, β = –0.285; p = 0.001) with comorbidity were reported. Conclusions: Physical function measures, especially walking speed and SPPB, are associated with comorbidity. Physical performance measures may improve the clinical evaluation of older persons.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000089822

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Cesari, M., Onder, G., Russo, A., Zamboni, V., Barillaro, C., Ferrucci, L., Pahor, M., Bernabei, R., & Landi, F.
Venue
Gerontology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2006
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
24-32
ISSN
  • 0304-324X (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0003
OpenAlex
W2069310417
Cited by
182
References
6
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comorbidity and Physical Function: Results from the Aging and Longevity Study in the Sirente Geographic Area (ilSIRENTE Study). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000089822
The paper
Cesari, M., Onder, G., Russo, A., Zamboni, V., Barillaro, C., Ferrucci, L., Pahor, M., Bernabei, R., & Landi, F. (2006). Comorbidity and Physical Function: Results from the Aging and Longevity Study in the Sirente Geographic Area (ilSIRENTE Study). Gerontology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000089822

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.