Cited by 702Frailty in Older AdultsBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionNutrition and Health in Aging

Added value of physical performance measures in predicting adverse health-related events: results from the health, aging and body composition study

Open access
Cesari, Matteo, Kritchevsky, Stephen B., Newman, Anne B., Simonsick, Eleanor M., Harris, Tamara B., Penninx, Brenda W., Brach, Jennifer S., Tylavsky, Frances A. +6 more·2009·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine how three different physical performance measures (PPMs) combine for added utility in predicting adverse health events in elders. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. PARTICIPANTS: Three thousand twenty‐four well‐functioning older persons (mean age 73.6). MEASUREMENTS: Timed gait, repeated chair stands, and balance (semi‐ and full‐tandem, and single leg stands each held for 30 seconds) tests were administered at baseline. Usual gait speed was categorized to distinguish high‐ and low‐risk participants using the previously established 1‐m/s cutpoint. The same population‐percentile (21.3%) was used to identify cutpoints for the repeated chair stands (17.1 seconds) and balance (53.0 seconds) tests. Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed to evaluate the added value of PPMs in predicting mortality, hospitalization, and (severe) mobility limitation events over 6.9 years of follow‐up. RESULTS: Risk estimates for developing adverse health‐related events were similarly large for each of the three high‐risk groups considered separately. Having more PPM scores at the high‐risk level was associated with a greater risk of developing adverse health‐related events. When all three PPMs were considered, having only one poor performance was sufficient to indicate a highly significantly higher risk of (severe) lower extremity and mortality events. CONCLUSION: Although gait speed is considered to be the most important predictor of adverse health events, these findings demonstrate that poor performance on other tests of lower extremity function are equally prognostic. This suggests that chair stand and standing balance performance may be adequate substitutes when gait speed is unavailable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02126.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cesari, M., Kritchevsky, S. B., Newman, A. B., Simonsick, E. M., Harris, T. B., Penninx, B. W., Brach, J. S., Tylavsky, F. A., Satterfield, S., Bauer, D. C., Rubin, S. M., Visser, M., Pahor, M., & for the Health, A. A. B. C. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-01-28
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
251-259
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1938427760
Cited by
702
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 36
FWCI
18.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (N01‐AG‐6–2101, N01AG62106, N01-AG-62103, P30AG024827, T32AG021885, P30AG028740, P30AG021332)
  • Institute on Aging, College of Medicine, University of Florida
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
physical performance measures, older adults, walking speed, chair stand, standing balance, tandem stance, mortality, hospitalization, mobility limitations, prognostic value, lower limb function, Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Postural Balance, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitalization, Humans, Leg, Male, Mortality, Motor Activity, Posture, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Cohort Studies, Mobility Limitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review