Cited by 59Electroconvulsive Therapy StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Isoflurane Narcotherapy in Depressive Patients Refractory to Conventional Antidepressant Drug Treatment

Langer, G., Karazman, R., Neumark, J., Saletu, B., Schönbeck, G., Grünberger, J., Dittrich, R., Petricek, W. +4 more·2008·Neuropsychobiology

Abstract

This is the first report on a controlled study comparing the therapeutic and non-therapeutic (side) effects of electroconvulsive treatment (ECT) and isoflurane narcotherapy (ISONAR; deep anesthesias with the inhalation of anesthetic isoflurane) in drug-refractory, severely depressed women, who had been randomly allocated either to ECT (n = 10) or ISONAR (n = 10). Patients from each group were subjected to a total of six treatment sessions (two sessions per week) and maintained on a fixed antidepressant drug dose. The antidepressant efficacy of either treatment was evaluated for each treatment session (in search of a ‘rapid antidepressant effect’) and at weekly intervals. Cognitive functions or signs of an organic brain syndrome were evaluated by means of psychological tests and extensive EEG analyses. Rapid antidepressant effects of the first treatment session were only significant in patients on ISONAR; in the subsequent treatment sessions, ECT also induced rapid antidepressant effects. Antidepressant effects during the treatment period were comparable, and patients on ISONAR improved further during follow-up, whereas patients on ECT tended to relapse. ISONAR-treated patients improved in most psychometric variables, whereas patients on ECT deteriorated. Finally, the EEG patterns of the ISONAR-treated patients remained normal or augmented (dominant alpha power), whereas patients on ECT developed an increase in abnormalities in EEG patterns and theta/delta power. This indicates an organic brain syndrome in patients on ECT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000119190

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several volatile anesthetics, such as isoflurane, nitrous oxide, propofol, and xenon, may produce rapid antidepressant effects.

    “Several volatile anesthetics, such as isoflurane, nitrous oxide, propofol, and xenon, may produce rapid antidepressant effects (157–165).”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langer, G., Karazman, R., Neumark, J., Saletu, B., Schönbeck, G., Grünberger, J., Dittrich, R., Petricek, W., Hoffmann, P., Linzmayer, L., Anderer, P., & Steinberger, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT)
  • University of Graz (AT)
Venue
Neuropsychobiology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2008-02-26
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
182-194
ISSN
  • 0302-282X (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0224
OpenAlex
W2049697739
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
electroconvulsive therapy, rapid antidepressant effects, relapse, cognitive function, organic mental disorders, EEG abnormalities, alpha power, antidepressant efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Drug Resistance, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Isoflurane, Middle Aged, Narcotherapy, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review