Cited by 33Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Naloxone increases the release of oxytocin, but not vasopressin, within limbic brain areas of conscious parturient rats: A push-pull perfusion study

Neumann, Inga, Russell, John A., Wolff, Brigitte, Landgraf, Rainer·2008·Neuroendocrinology

Abstract

The influence of naloxone on the release in limbic brain areas of both oxytocin (OXT) and vasopressin, measured by radioimmunoassay, was studied in conscious parturient rats. Three consecutive 30-min push-pull perfusions (20 microliters artificial CSF/min) were made, via previously implanted guide cannulae, within the medio-lateral septum and dorsal hippocampus of parturient animals given saline or naloxone hydrochloride (5 mg/kg body weight) after delivery of the second pup. OXT release in the hippocampus, but not in the septum, was increased during parturition, compared to day 1 post partum. During the first 30-min collection period following naloxone administration, release of OXT was significantly elevated within the septum (44% compared to saline controls, p less than 0.002), but not in the dorsal hippocampus; vasopressin release was not affected. In contrast, on day 1 post partum, naloxone, administered 5 min after starting two consecutive perfusions failed to alter OXT release in septum or hippocampus in conscious rats. Naloxone, known to increase the release of OXT also from the posterior pituitary during parturition, speeded the parturition process significantly between the birth of pups 4 and 8 during push-pull perfusion of septum or hippocampus. The data suggest that endogenous opioid inhibition is involved in the regulation of central OXT release, but not vasopressin release, during parturition. Together with previous studies on OXT release from the posterior pituitary, it seems that during parturition there is coordinated endogenous opioid action on the release of OXT both into blood and into the brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000125958

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neumann, I., Russell, J. A., Wolff, B., & Landgraf, R.
Affiliations
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Venue
Neuroendocrinology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2008-04-07
Volume
54
Issue
6
Pages
545-551
ISSN
  • 0028-3835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0194
OpenAlex
W1997803662
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
naloxone, oxytocin release, vasopressin release, childbirth, endogenous opioids, limbic system, medial septum, dorsal hippocampus, postpartum period, conscious rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Arginine Vasopressin, Consciousness, Female, Labor, Obstetric, Limbic System, Naloxone, Oxytocin, Perfusion, Pregnancy, Rats, Inbred Strains, Time Factors, Tissue Distribution, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review