Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 69

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tissue Engineering for Cutaneous Wounds: Selecting the Proper Time and Space for Growth Factors, Cells and the Extracellular Matrix

Macri, L., Clark, R.A.F.·2009·Skin Pharmacology and Physiology

Abstract

Currently, autografts are the best treatment to any substantial cutaneous injury, and their success is well known as a burn therapy. However, autografts have been less successful in the treatment of chronic ulcers, and are usually a last-resort therapy because of infection at the injured site, high surgical expense, additional morbidity and engraftment failure. In addition, patients with burns covering more than 50% of their skin have limited donor sites for autograft harvest. Therefore, there is a great need for a cost-effective, user-friendly, tissue-engineered construct (TEC) that can provide successful treatments to both acute and chronic wounds in a wider repertoire of patients, including diabetics and the elderly. One approach to the challenge is to create a substitute for skin in vitro that can integrate into the engraftment site in vivo. An alternative is to engineer a biocompatible, resorbable matrix that can recruit the proper, native tissue cells to the injured site and induce them to heal the wound without scarring. This chapter reviews the 3 essential components of cutaneous wound healing, that is, cells, extracellular matrix molecules and bioactive molecules, that must be considered for designing TECs to potentially enhance the healing process. In nature, a ‘dynamic reciprocity’ exists amongst cells and extracellular matrix that is mediated by bioactive molecules at the site of injury. Thus, it is important to examine the interplay of all 3 components when engineering a TEC. This chapter also includes examples of commercially available products to highlight how researchers have already begun to find success in tissue engineering.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000178867

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1038%2Fsj.jid.5700715 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016%2Fj.burns.2007.03.020 · DOI
  3. 10.1146%2Fannurev.cellbio.22.010305.104315 · DOI
  4. 10.1016%2Fj.semcancer.2005.05.001 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1002%2Fbies.950170206 · DOI
  6. 10.1111%2F1523-1747.ep12500075 · DOI
  7. 10.1001%2Fjama.297.9.938 · DOI
  8. 10.1016%2Fj.burns.2005.08.009 · DOI
  9. 10.1016%2Fj.clindermatol.2004.07.023 · DOI
  10. 10.1126%2Fscience.1069210 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1089%2Ften.1998.4.403 · DOI
  12. 10.1053%2Fjoca.2001.0482 · DOI
  13. 10.1126%2Fscience.282.5391.1145 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016%2Fj.cell.2007.11.019 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1259%2Fbjr%2F25927054 · DOI
  16. 10.1038%2Fnmat1249 · DOI
  17. 10.1089%2Ften.2006.12.3307 · DOI
  18. 10.1038%2Fnm1684 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016%2Fj.addr.2007.08.012 · DOI
  20. 10.1016%2Fj.addr.2007.08.007 · DOI
  21. 10.1016%2Fj.cell.2006.06.044 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038%2Fnrm2125 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016%2Fj.addr.2007.08.014 · DOI
  24. 10.1126%2Fscience.1092053 · DOI
  25. 10.1038%2Fjid.2008.75 · DOI
  26. 10.1074%2Fjbc.M300171200 · DOI
  27. 10.1016%2FS0014-5793%2802%2903439-7 · DOI
  28. 10.1242%2Fjcs.00503 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1073%2Fpnas.0506004103 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Macri, L., & Clark, R. A. F.
Venue
Skin Pharmacology and Physiology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2009
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
83-93
ISSN
  • 1660-5527
  • 1660-5535
Cited by
69
References
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.