The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tissue Engineering for Cutaneous Wounds: Selecting the Proper Time and Space for Growth Factors, Cells and the Extracellular Matrix
Abstract
Currently, autografts are the best treatment to any substantial cutaneous injury, and their success is well known as a burn therapy. However, autografts have been less successful in the treatment of chronic ulcers, and are usually a last-resort therapy because of infection at the injured site, high surgical expense, additional morbidity and engraftment failure. In addition, patients with burns covering more than 50% of their skin have limited donor sites for autograft harvest. Therefore, there is a great need for a cost-effective, user-friendly, tissue-engineered construct (TEC) that can provide successful treatments to both acute and chronic wounds in a wider repertoire of patients, including diabetics and the elderly. One approach to the challenge is to create a substitute for skin in vitro that can integrate into the engraftment site in vivo. An alternative is to engineer a biocompatible, resorbable matrix that can recruit the proper, native tissue cells to the injured site and induce them to heal the wound without scarring. This chapter reviews the 3 essential components of cutaneous wound healing, that is, cells, extracellular matrix molecules and bioactive molecules, that must be considered for designing TECs to potentially enhance the healing process. In nature, a ‘dynamic reciprocity’ exists amongst cells and extracellular matrix that is mediated by bioactive molecules at the site of injury. Thus, it is important to examine the interplay of all 3 components when engineering a TEC. This chapter also includes examples of commercially available products to highlight how researchers have already begun to find success in tissue engineering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Dermal matrix acts as a sterile tissue graft which can be applied directly to wound beds of DFUs and integrate with the surrounding host tissues to actively stimulate cell migration, angiogenesis, and epithelialization, resulting in accelerated wound healing [40].”
From Effectiveness and safety of dermal matrix used for diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2024) · cites this paper as [40]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cell adaptation to a physiologically relevant ECM mimic with different viscoelastic properties
Ghosh, K., Pan, Z., Guan, E., Ge, S., Liu, Y., Nakamura, T., Ren, X.-D., Rafailovich, M., & Clark, R. A. F. (2007) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.09.038 · Cited by 386
Self-citationGrowth factor binding to the pericellular matrix and its importance in tissue engineering☆
MACRI, L., SILVERSTEIN, D., & CLARK, R. (2007) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.015 · Cited by 292
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- 10.1038%2Fsj.jid.5700715 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016%2Fj.burns.2007.03.020 · DOI
- 10.1146%2Fannurev.cellbio.22.010305.104315 · DOI
- 10.1016%2Fj.semcancer.2005.05.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002%2Fbies.950170206 · DOI
- 10.1111%2F1523-1747.ep12500075 · DOI
- 10.1001%2Fjama.297.9.938 · DOI
- 10.1016%2Fj.burns.2005.08.009 · DOI
- 10.1016%2Fj.clindermatol.2004.07.023 · DOI
- 10.1126%2Fscience.1069210 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1089%2Ften.1998.4.403 · DOI
- 10.1053%2Fjoca.2001.0482 · DOI
- 10.1126%2Fscience.282.5391.1145 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016%2Fj.cell.2007.11.019 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1259%2Fbjr%2F25927054 · DOI
- 10.1038%2Fnmat1249 · DOI
- 10.1089%2Ften.2006.12.3307 · DOI
- 10.1038%2Fnm1684 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016%2Fj.addr.2007.08.012 · DOI
- 10.1016%2Fj.addr.2007.08.007 · DOI
- 10.1016%2Fj.cell.2006.06.044 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038%2Fnrm2125 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016%2Fj.addr.2007.08.014 · DOI
- 10.1126%2Fscience.1092053 · DOI
- 10.1038%2Fjid.2008.75 · DOI
- 10.1074%2Fjbc.M300171200 · DOI
- 10.1016%2FS0014-5793%2802%2903439-7 · DOI
- 10.1242%2Fjcs.00503 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073%2Fpnas.0506004103 · DOI
Cited by
Implications of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 in Skeletal Muscle and Various Diseases
Ahmad, S. S., Ahmad, K., Lee, E. J., Lee, Y.-H., & Choi, I. (2020) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9081773 · Cited by 202
Sui, L., Xie, Q., Jiang, H.-T., & Li, X.-D. (2024) · BMC Endocrine Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12902-024-01550-3 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Macri, L., & Clark, R. A. F.
- Venue
- Skin Pharmacology and Physiology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 83-93
- ISSN
- 1660-5527
- 1660-5535
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses (vor)
- www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.