Cited by 37

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of Changes in Body Composition and Adaptive Thermogenesis on the Difference between Measured and Predicted Weight Loss in Obese Women

Goele, Kristin, Bosy-Westphal, Anja, Rümcker, Birgit, Lagerpusch, Merit, Müller, Manfred J.·2009·Obesity Facts

Abstract

Background There is a difference between measured and predicted weight loss in obese patients. This might be explained by the composition of weight loss, adaptive thermogenesis, or poor compliance. Patients and methods 48 overweight and obese female patients (31.5 +/- 6.1 years; BMI 35.4 +/- 4.4 kg/m(2)) were investigated before and 13.9 +/- 2.4 weeks after dietary treatment (1,000 kcal/day). Body composition was measured by air-displacement plethysmography and resting energy expenditure (REE) by indirect calorimetry. Physical activity was assessed using electronic pedometers in order to calculate total energy expenditure from REE and physical activity level (PAL). Fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) were converted into caloric equivalents using 9.45 kcal/g FM and 1.13 kcal/g FFM. Predicted weight loss was calculated by Wishnofsky's '7,700 kcal/kg rule'. Results Weight (-8.4 +/- 3.9 kg; p Conclusion 14% of the difference between measured and predicted weight loss was explained by the higher proportion of FM in weight loss and 38% by adaptive thermogenesis (in 54% of the women). Thus, poor compliance was responsible for about 50% of the difference between measured and predicted weight loss only.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000210369

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association between weight change and adaptive thermogenesis was weak in obese patients before and after weight loss.

    “analysing data on obese patients before and after weight loss [1, 55, 56], the association between weight change and AT was weak (see Fig. 2).”
  • Adaptive thermogenesis explained about 50% of the less-than-expected weight loss in obese patients.

    “AT explained about 50 % of the less-than-expected weight loss in obese patients [1, 2].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Goele, K., Bosy-Westphal, A., Rümcker, B., Lagerpusch, M., & Müller, M. J.
Venue
Obesity Facts
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2009
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
6-6
ISSN
  • 1662-4033
  • 1662-4025
Cited by
37
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review