CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 261Nursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental IllnessFamily Support in Illness

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of interventions involving the family in the treatment of adult patients with chronic physical diseases: A meta-analysis.

Hartmann, Mechthild, Bäzner, Eva, Wild, Beate, Eisler, Ivan, Herzog, Wolfgang·2010·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
DOI 10.1159/000286958
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Families can have considerable influence on the health of a patient with a chronic physical disease, and attempts have been made to optimise treatment by involving family members. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically assess the effects of family-oriented interventions on adults with chronic physical diseases. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomised clinical trials that have evaluated the effects of family-based interventions for adult patients compared to standard treatment. Interventions were classified as psychoeducation or addressing family relationships. The outcomes studied were the patient's physical and mental health and the health of the family members. The effect sizes were calculated as Hedges' g and combined using random-effects models. RESULTS: Fifty-two relevant randomised controlled trials (including 8,896 patients) were extracted. The main disease groups were cardiovascular diseases including stroke, cancer and arthritis. Meta-analysis showed that family involvement resulted in significantly better health than standard treatment for all outcomes. The mean overall effect sizes were 0.32 for the patients' physical health, 0.28 for the patients' mental health and 0.35 for the family members' health. Overall, the effects were not large, but they were broad, significant and stable over a long period of time. There was a tendency towards higher effects in favour of relationship-focused family interventions compared to educational interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial interventions involving family members in the treatment of chronic physical diseases have positive effects on the health outcome for both the patient and his/her family. Further high-quality research is necessary to investigate differential effects.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000286958

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 10.1037%2F0033-2909.127.4.472 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.3109%2F03009748609092661 · DOI
  3. 10.1001%2Fjama.241.16.1700 · DOI
  4. 10.1097%2F01.qai.0000225014.61192.98 · DOI
  5. 10.1126%2Fscience.847460 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 261

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hartmann, M., Bäzner, E., Wild, B., Eisler, I., & Herzog, W.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • King's College London (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2010
Volume
79
Issue
3
Pages
136-148
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
DOI
10.1159/000286958
OpenAlex
W2047620292
Cited by
261
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
family involvement, family-centered intervention, chronic physical illness, psychosocial interventions, psychoeducation, family relationships, patient mental health, physical health, cardiovascular disease, stroke, cancer, arthritis
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Chronic Disease, Family Relations, Family Therapy, Health Status, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review