Cited by 527Nursing care and researchCancer survivorship and careFamily Support in Illness

Psychosocial Care for Family Caregivers of Patients With Cancer

Northouse, Laurel, Williams, Anna-leila, Given, Barbara, McCorkle, Ruth·2012·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose To understand family caregivers' needs for better preparation and care, this state-of-the-science review examines the effect of caregiving on the health and well-being of caregivers, the efficacy of research-tested interventions on patient and caregiver outcomes, implications of the research on policy and practice, and recommendations for practice and future research. Methods We reviewed research that described the multiple effects of cancer on caregivers' well-being. Five meta-analyses were analyzed to determine the effect of interventions with caregivers on patient and caregiver outcomes. In addition, we reviewed legislation such as the Affordable Care Act and the Family Leave Act along with current primary care practice to determine whether family caregivers' needs have been addressed. Results Research findings indicate that caregiver stress can lead to psychological and sleep disturbances and changes in caregivers' physical health, immune function, and financial well-being. Research-tested interventions delivered to caregivers of patients with cancer or other chronic illnesses can reduce many of these negative effects and improve caregivers' coping skills, knowledge, and quality of life. Although these interventions also decrease patients' symptoms, reduce mortality (non-dementia patients), and improve patients' physical and mental health, they are seldom implemented in practice. Conclusion Recommendations for practice include development of standardized guideline…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2011.39.5798

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Northouse, L., Williams, A.-L., Given, B., & McCorkle, R.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2012-04-10
Volume
30
Issue
11
Pages
1227-1234
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2100348247
Cited by
527
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
family caregivers, cancer, psychosocial care, caregiver well-being, caregiver stress, caregiver interventions, caregiver education, caregiver assessment, caregiver quality of life
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Humans, Neoplasms, Primary Health Care, Sleep Wake Disorders, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Caregivers, Mood Disorders, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review