Cited by 38Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic diversity and population structure

Genetic Differences between Five European Populations

Open access
Moskvina, Valentina, Smith, Michael, Ivanov, Dobril, Blackwood, Douglas, StClair, David, Hultman, Christina, Toncheva, Draga, Gill, Michael +14 more·2010·Human Heredity

Abstract

AIMS: We sought to examine the magnitude of the differences in SNP allele frequencies between five European populations (Scotland, Ireland, Sweden, Bulgaria and Portugal) and to identify the loci with the greatest differences. METHODS: We performed a population-based genome-wide association analysis with Affymetrix 6.0 and 5.0 arrays. We used a 4 degrees of freedom χ(2) test to determine the magnitude of stratification for each SNP. We then examined the genes within the most stratified regions, using a highly conservative cutoff of p < 10(-45). RESULTS: We found 40,593 SNPs which are genome-wide significantly (p ≤ 10(-8)) stratified between these populations. The largest differences clustered in gene ontology categories for immunity and pigmentation. Some of the top loci span genes that have already been reported as highly stratified: genes for hair color and pigmentation (HERC2, EXOC2, IRF4), the LCT gene, genes involved in NAD metabolism, and in immunity (HLA and the Toll-like receptor genes TLR10, TLR1, TLR6). However, several genes have not previously been reported as stratified within European populations, indicating that they might also have provided selective advantages: several zinc finger genes, two genes involved in glutathione synthesis or function, and most intriguingly, FOXP2, implicated in speech development. CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrates that many SNPs show genome-wide significant differences within European populations and the magnitude of the differences correlate with the geographical distance. At least some of these differences are due to the selective advantage of polymorphisms within these loci.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000313854

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bauchet M, McEvoy B, Pearson LN, Quillen EE, Sarkisian T, Hovhannesyan K, Deka R, Bradley DG, Shriver MD: Measuring Euro- pean population stratification with microar- ray genotype data. Am J Hum Genet 2007; 80: 948-956.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moskvina, V., Smith, M., Ivanov, D., Blackwood, D., StClair, D., Hultman, C., Toncheva, D., Gill, M., Corvin, A., O’Dushlaine, C., Morris, D. W., Wray, N. R., Sullivan, P., Pato, C., Pato, M. T., Sklar, P., Purcell, S., Holmans, P., O’Donovan, M. C., Owen, M. J., Kirov, G., & International Schizophrenia Consortium<footref id="foot01"><sup>1</sup></footref>
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Alexandrovska Hospital (BG)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Venue
Human Heredity
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2010
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
141-149
ISSN
  • 0001-5652 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0062
OpenAlex
W1999879135
Cited by
38
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Heredity (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (19556)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH077139, R01MH080403)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
population stratification, SNP allele frequencies, European populations, genetic differentiation, pigmentation genes, immunity genes, LCT gene, NAD+ metabolism, HLA, Toll-like receptors, FOXP2, zinc finger genes, glutathione synthesis, geographic distance, natural selection, Scotland, Ireland, Sweden, Bulgaria, Portugal
MeSH terms
Genetics, Population, Humans, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Lactase, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review