Genome-Wide Association Studies of Quantitatively Measured Skin, Hair, and Eye Pigmentation in Four European Populations
Open accessAbstract
Pigmentation of the skin, hair, and eyes varies both within and between human populations. Identifying the genes and alleles underlying this variation has been the goal of many candidate gene and several genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Most GWAS for pigmentary traits to date have been based on subjective phenotypes using categorical scales. But skin, hair, and eye pigmentation vary continuously. Here, we seek to characterize quantitative variation in these traits objectively and accurately and to determine their genetic basis. Objective and quantitative measures of skin, hair, and eye color were made using reflectance or digital spectroscopy in Europeans from Ireland, Poland, Italy, and Portugal. A GWAS was conducted for the three quantitative pigmentation phenotypes in 176 women across 313,763 SNP loci, and replication of the most significant associations was attempted in a sample of 294 European men and women from the same countries. We find that the pigmentation phenotypes are highly stratified along axes of European genetic differentiation. The country of sampling explains approximately 35% of the variation in skin pigmentation, 31% of the variation in hair pigmentation, and 40% of the variation in eye pigmentation. All three quantitative phenotypes are correlated with each other. In our two-stage association study, we reproduce the association of rs1667394 at the OCA2/HERC2 locus with eye color but we do not identify new genetic determinants of skin and hair pigmentation supporting the lack of major genes affecting skin and hair color variation within Europe and suggesting that not only careful phenotyping but also larger cohorts are required to understand the genetic architecture of these complex quantitative traits. Interestingly, we also see that in each of these four populations, men are more lightly pigmented in the unexposed skin of the inner arm than women, a fact that is underappreciated and may vary across the world.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In four European samples, objectively measured skin, hair, and eye pigmentation was strongly stratified by country of sampling, and a two-stage GWAS reproduced the OCA2/HERC2 association with eye color but found no reproducible novel loci for skin or hair pigmentation. The study also found that men had lighter inner-arm skin pigmentation than women in all four countries.
Key findings
- Country of sampling explained 35.3% of skin, 30.8% of hair, and 39.7% of eye pigmentation variation; sex explained only 10.3%, 0.0%, and 0.0%, respectively.
- In the GWAS of 176 women and 313,763 SNPs, eye pigmentation was associated with rs1667394 at OCA2/HERC2 (p = 8.1×10⁻⁹) and rs702477 in SCIN (p = 1.3×10⁻⁷); no SNP reached genome-wide significance for hair or skin, though rs9809315 in FLNB nearly did for skin (p = 1.8×10⁻⁷).
- Replication in 294 Europeans found five OCA2/HERC2 SNPs reproducibly associated with eye pigmentation, with rs1667394 most significant (p = 3.0×10⁻¹³); no SNP was reproducibly associated with skin or hair pigmentation.
- Males had lighter skin than females in all four countries; the combined adjusted difference was 1.57 M index units (95% CI = 1.14–2.01, p = 4×10⁻¹²). Skin, hair, and eye pigmentation were correlated overall (r = 0.40–0.47), with attenuated correlations after adjusting for country and sex (r = 0.13–0.18).
Methods
- Participants were recruited in Dublin, Warsaw, Rome, and Porto; skin and hair pigmentation were measured as melanin (M) index by DermaSpectrometer reflectance spectroscopy, and eye pigmentation as C′ score from digital iris photographs, alongside self-reported hair and eye color.
- Two-stage association study: stage 1 GWAS in 180 European women genotyped at 317,503 SNPs (HumanHap300v1), reduced after QC to 176 women and 313,763 SNPs; replication in 294 individuals (153 males, 141 females) using a GoldenGate assay for selected top SNPs.
- Association was tested with additive linear models correcting for country of sampling; population structure was assessed by PCA and PLINK nearest-neighbor analysis, with permutation, imputation at OCA2/HERC2, and power calculations also performed.
Limitations
- Stated by the authors: the small sample size meant the study was only sufficiently powered to identify the major HERC2/OCA2 effect on eye color, and it did not identify new genetic determinants of skin or hair pigmentation.
- Stated by the authors: the country-based population-structure correction may not generalize to more heterogeneous samples such as larger pan-European or European-American cohorts.
- Evident from the text: the GWAS stage included only women, hair pigmentation data were available for only 106 women in the GWAS and 235 individuals in replication, and replication was limited to SNPs selected at a liberal GWAS p-value threshold.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 41 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
All three quantitative pigmentation phenotypes are correlated with each other.
“All three quantitative phenotypes are correlated with each other.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Hair pigmentation differs between sexes in only one country, Ireland, where males have darker hair color than females (p = 8×10−3).
“It differs between sexes in only one country, Ireland, where males have darker hair color than females (p = 8×10−3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Within countries, skin and hair pigmentation are correlated in Poland and Italy.
“Skin and hair pigmentation are correlated in Poland and Italy”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the two-stage association study, rs1667394 at the OCA2/HERC2 locus is associated with eye color.
“we reproduce the association of rs1667394 at the OCA2/HERC2 locus with eye color”
- Also stated in: § Statistical Analyses of the GWAS and the Replication · plain
“For eye pigmentation, the most significant SNP for both is rs1667394 (p = 1.8×10−9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Statistical Analyses of the GWAS and the Replication · plain
- Findingown data
Irish participants have lighter skin pigmentation than Polish, Italian, and Portuguese participants (p<2×10−16 for all three comparisons).
“Irish participants have lighter skin pigmentation than Polish, Italian, and Portuguese participants (p<2×10−16 for all three comparisons”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
The hair M index has a unimodal distribution skewed to the left, at smaller M index or lighter pigmentation (n = 341).
“The hair M index has a unimodal distribution skewed to the left, at smaller M index or lighter pigmentation (Figure 1C, n = 341).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Average eye C' differs among countries, with the exception of the Italy vs. Portugal comparison.
“average C’ differs among countries, with the exception of the Italy vs. Portugal comparison”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Irish participants have the lightest eye pigmentation on average.
“Irish participants have the lightest eye pigmentation on average”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Hair and eye pigmentation are correlated across all four countries when adjusting for sex (Pearson r = 0.47, p<2×10−16).
“Pearson r = 0.47, p<2×10−16 for hair and eye”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Within countries, hair and eye pigmentation are correlated in Portugal.
“Hair and eye pigmentation are correlated in Portugal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
After adjusting for both country and sex, hair and skin pigmentation remain correlated in the four populations combined (Pearson r = 0.18, p = 7×10−4).
“hair and skin pigmentation (Pearson r = 0.18, p = 7×10−4)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Hair and skin pigmentation are correlated across all four countries when adjusting for sex (Pearson r = 0.42, p = 1×10−15).
“Pearson r = 0.42, p = 1×10−15 for hair and skin”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The Pearson correlation between the eye C' score and the eye color score is 0.89.
“the correlation between the eye C’ score and the eye color score is 0.89”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In each of the four European populations, men are more lightly pigmented in the unexposed skin of the inner arm than women.
“in each of these four populations, men are more lightly pigmented in the unexposed skin of the inner arm than women”
- Also stated in: § Quantitative Skin, Hair and Eye Pigmentation Phenotypes · plain
“males have lighter skin pigmentation (lower M) than females in all four European countries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Quantitative Skin, Hair and Eye Pigmentation Phenotypes · plain
- Findingown data
In the combined sample, after adjusting for country of sampling, males are on average more lightly pigmented than females by 1.57 M index units (95% CI = 1.14-2.01, p = 4×10−12).
“males are on average more lightly pigmented than females by 1.57 M index units (95% CI = 1.14–2.01, p = 4×10−12)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
PC1 separates Northern (Poland, Ireland) from Southern (Italy, Portugal) countries.
“PC1 separates Northern (Poland, Ireland) from Southern (Italy, Portugal) countries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Skin and eye pigmentation are correlated across all four countries when adjusting for sex (Pearson r = 0.40, p<2×10−16).
“Pearson r = 0.40, p<2×10−16 for skin and eye”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The first two principal components together separate the individuals into the four countries of sampling.
“The first two principal components (PCs) together separate the individuals into the four countries of sampling”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
After adjusting for both country and sex, skin and eye pigmentation remain correlated in the four populations combined (Pearson r = 0.13, p = 5×10−3).
“skin and eye (Pearson r = 0.13, p = 5×10−3)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Self-reported phenotypic scores and quantified phenotypes are highly correlated.
“Self-reported phenotypic scores and quantified phenotypes are highly correlated”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The Pearson correlation between the hair M index and hair color score is 0.52.
“The Pearson correlation between the hair M index and hair color score is 0.52”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Within countries, skin and eye pigmentation are correlated in Ireland.
“Skin and eye pigmentation are correlated in Ireland.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Irish and Polish participants have lighter eye pigmentation than Italian and Portuguese people (p<10−9 for all four comparisons).
“Irish and Polish participants have lighter eye pigmentation than Italian and Portuguese people (p<10−9 for all four comparisons”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The greatest difference in eye pigmentation occurs between the Northern and Southern European countries.
“the greatest difference in eye pigmentation occurs between the Northern and Southern European countries”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Hair pigmentation is lighter in the Northern European countries, Ireland and Poland, than in the Southern European countries, Italy and Portugal (p<10−7 for all four comparisons).
“Hair pigmentation is lighter in the Northern European countries, Ireland and Poland, than in the Southern European countries, Italy and Portugal (p<10−7 for all four comparisons”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There is no evidence of a difference in eye C' between males and females.
“There is no evidence of a difference in C’ between males and females”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No new genetic determinants of skin and hair pigmentation were identified.
“we do not identify new genetic determinants of skin and hair pigmentation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After adjusting for both country and sex, hair and eye pigmentation remain correlated in the four populations combined (Pearson r = 0.15, p = 7×10−3).
“hair and eye (Pearson r = 0.15, p = 7×10−3)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The pigmentation phenotypes (skin, hair, and eye) are highly stratified along axes of European genetic differentiation.
“We find that the pigmentation phenotypes are highly stratified along axes of European genetic differentiation.”
- Also stated in: § Stratification of the Phenotypes · plain
“The three pigmentary phenotypes are highly stratified across European countries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Stratification of the Phenotypes · plain
- Findingown data
Irish participants have the lightest hair pigmentation of all groups.
“Irish participants have the lightest hair pigmentation of all groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
PC2 separates Eastern (Poland, Italy) from Western (Ireland, Portugal) countries.
“PC2 separates Eastern (Poland, Italy) from Western (Ireland, Portugal) countries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
One SNP, rs9809315, almost reaches genome-wide significance for association with skin pigmentation (p = 1.8×10−7).
“although one SNP, rs9809315, almost reaches genome-wide significance level for the association with skin pigmentation (p = 1.8×10−7)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For eye color, the study replicated the known and strong association of the HERC2 SNP rs1667394.
“For eye color, we replicated the known and strong association of the HERC2 SNP rs1667394.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the absence of a correction for population structure, skin pigmentation shows a single very strong false positive association with a 1 Mb region on chromosome 2 that spans the lactase (LCT) gene (smallest p-value = 8.2×10−13 for rs932206).
“Interestingly, we found that in the absence of a correction for population structure, skin pigmentation shows a single very strong false positive association with a 1 Mb region on chromosome 2 that spans the lactase (LCT) gene (smallest p-value = 8.2×10−13 is for rs932206).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The genotype at rs12913832 was imputed in the GWAS samples and the significance of the association with eye color, correcting for ancestry, was of similar magnitude at the imputed rs12913832 (p = 2.0×10−12) as at the genotyped rs1667394 (p = 5.8×10−12) considering that the derived allele is recessive.
“The genotype at rs12913832 was imputed in the GWAS samples and the significance of the association with eye color, correcting for ancestry was found to be of similar magnitude at the imputed rs12913832 (p = 2.0×10−12) as at the genotyped rs1667394 (p = 5.8×10−12) considering that the derived allele is recessive.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using a Bonferroni correction per phenotype to set the replication significance threshold at 5%, five SNPs at the OCA2/HERC2 locus are reproducibly associated with eye pigmentation.
“Using a Bonferroni correction per phenotype to set the significance threshold for the replication at 5% (p<2.4×10−3 for skin, p<1.9×10−3 for hair, and p<1.5×10−3 for eye pigmentation), we find that five SNPs at the OCA2/HERC2 locus are reproducibly associated with eye pigmentation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Adjusting for the recessive effect of the rs12913832 derived allele in the GWAS did not provide any new genome-wide significant signal.
“Adjusting for the recessive effect of the rs12913832 derived allele in the GWAS did not provide any new genome-wide significant signal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
rs1667394 is the most significant SNP in the replication (p = 3.0×10−13).
“rs1667394 is the most significant (p = 3.0×10−13 in the replication).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the GWAS cohort, the first three genetic PCs together account for 37.8%, 24.1%, and 35.5% of the variation in skin, hair, and eye pigmentation, respectively.
“In the GWAS cohort, the first three PCs together account for 37.8%, 24.1%, and 35.5% of the variation in skin, hair, and eye pigmentation respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No SNP was associated with hair and skin pigmentation.
“No SNP was associated with hair and skin pigmentation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At the genome-wide significance level, two SNPs are associated with eye pigmentation: rs1667394 (p = 8.1×10−9) and rs702477 (p = 1.3×10−7).
“At this significance level, two SNPs are associated with eye pigmentation: rs1667394 (p = 8.1×10−9) and rs702477 (p = 1.3×10−7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
If the GWAS are performed without a correction for population structure, there is a large deviation from expectation for lambda (1.15, 1.11, and 1.23 for skin, hair, and eye pigmentation) and the Q-Q plots.
“In contrast, if the GWAS are performed without a correction for population structure, we see a large deviation from expectation for both lambda (1.15, 1.11, and 1.23 for skin, hair, and eye pigmentation) and the Q-Q plots (Figure S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For eye pigmentation, the presence of population structure results in inflated test statistics at the OCA2/HERC2 locus (smallest p-value = 5.4×10−17 for rs1667394).
“For eye pigmentation, the presence of population structure results in inflated test statistics at the OCA2/HERC2 locus (smallest p-value = 5.4×10−17 is for rs1667394).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For all three pigmentation phenotypes, the percent of phenotypic variance explained by genetic PCs increases as the number of PCs in the linear model increases to three and then stabilizes.
“For all three pigmentation phenotypes, the percent variance explained increases as the number of PCs used in the linear model increases to three and then stabilizes (Figure 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Q-Q plots show no obvious deviation from expectation.
“Q-Q plots show no obvious deviation from expectation (Figure S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The genomic control inflation factor lambda values are close to the expected value of 1: 1.00, 1.02, and 0.99 for the skin, hair, and eye GWAS, respectively.
“Lambda values are close to the expected value of 1. They are 1.00, 1.02, and 0.99 for the skin, hair, and eye GWAS, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The frequency of the rs183671 derived allele increases from Southern to Northern Europe: it is 88%, 89%, 98%, and 97% in the Portuguese, Italian, Polish, and Irish cohorts, respectively.
“The frequency of the rs183671 derived allele increases from Southern to Northern Europe: it is 88%, 89%, 98%, and 97% in the Portuguese, Italian, Polish, and Irish cohorts, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the GWAS, unlike in previous candidate gene studies, the minor, derived allele at R163Q is associated with darker skin pigmentation.
“We did not obtain genotype data for this variant in the replication study, but we note that in our GWAS, unlike in previous candidate gene studies, the minor, derived allele is associated with darker skin pigmentation (Table S3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
By the DermaSpectrometer M index measure, males are more lightly pigmented than females in each of the four European countries studied.
“Interestingly, our analysis of variation in skin color in Europe demonstrates a consistent difference in skin color between the sexes. By the DermaSpectrometer M index measure, males are more lightly pigmented than females in each of the four European countries we studied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All three pigmentary phenotypes are correlated with each other even after correcting for population structure.
“We found that all three pigmentary phenotypes are correlated with each other even after correcting for population structure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The third most significant SNP in the skin pigmentation GWAS is the rare non-synonymous variant R163Q (rs885479, allele frequency of 3% in the GWAS, p = 1×10−5) in the MC1R gene.
“Lastly we note that the third most significant SNP in the skin pigmentation GWAS is the rare non-synonymous variant R163Q (rs885479, allele frequency of 3% in our GWAS, p = 1×10−5, Table S3) in the MC1R gene.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the GWAS, a correction of the association test based on country of origin performs equivalently to a correction using genetic PCs.
“In our GWAS, we have found that a correction of the association test based on country of origin performs equivalently to a correction using genetic PCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The lack of new genetic determinants supports the lack of major genes affecting skin and hair color variation within Europe.
“supporting the lack of major genes affecting skin and hair color variation within Europe”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Variation between blond and brown hair color is explained by variation at OCA2/HERC2, SLC45A2, SLC24A4, IRF4/EXOC2, TPCN2, KITLG, and MC1R.
“between blond and brown hair color by variation at OCA2/HERC2, SLC45A2, SLC24A4, IRF4/EXOC2, TPCN2, KITLG, and MC1R”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] MR Gerstenblith, 2010, Genome-wide association studies of pigmentation and skin cancer: a review and meta-analysis, Pigment cell & melanoma research source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
Removing the individual with discrepant self-reported eye color vs. C' score from the association study produces similar p-values, only slightly less significant for the OCA2/HERC2 SNPs.
“removing the sample from the association study produces similar p-values, only slightly less significant for the OCA2/HERC2 SNPs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Phenotypic variation between blue and non-blue eye color is explained in large part by genetic variation at the OCA2/HERC2 locus along with genetic variation at SLC45A2, SLC24A4, IRF4, TYR, and TYRP1.
“Phenotypic variation between blue and non-blue eye color is explained in large part by genetic variation at the OCA2/HERC2 locus along with genetic variation at SLC45A2, SLC24A4, IRF4, TYR, and TYRP1”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] MR Gerstenblith, 2010, Genome-wide association studies of pigmentation and skin cancer: a review and meta-analysis, Pigment cell & melanoma research source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
GWAS have proven useful for identifying genes for hair and eye color variation in populations of European ancestry in part because of methods to correct for population stratification.
“Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have proven to be useful for identifying genes for hair and eye color variation in populations of European ancestry in part because of methods to correct for population stratification [8]–[13].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8]–[13]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
A strong and intrinsic confounding with population structure presents a significant challenge for genetic association studies of human pigmentary traits.
“a strong and intrinsic confounding with population structure presents a significant challenge for genetic association studies of human pigmentary traits”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Population structure acts as a confounder because both the lactase-persistence allele at LCT and lighter skin pigmentation are correlated with the North-South cline within Europe.
“Population structure acts as a confounder because both the lactase-persistence allele at LCT and lighter skin pigmentation are correlated with the North-South cline within Europe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The lambda values and Q-Q plots indicate no evidence for a systematic bias or inflation of test statistics by, for example, uncorrected population stratification.
“These results indicate no evidence for a systematic bias or inflation of our test statistics by, for example, uncorrected population stratification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The LCT gene is a locus well-documented as showing substantial genetic differentiation within Europe.
“The LCT gene is a locus well-documented as showing substantial genetic differentiation within Europe [29], [30].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [29] Consortium Wellcome Trust Case Control, 2007, Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [30] V Moskvina, 2010, Genetic Differences between Five European Populations, Human heredity source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Using country of sampling as a covariate is a correction method that can also be used in the replication stage where only candidate SNPs are genotyped and genetic PCs cannot be calculated.
“but the approach of using country as a covariate is a correction method that can be also used in the replication stage where only candidate SNPs are genotyped and therefore genetic PCs cannot be calculated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
One GWAS of South Asians found that SLC24A5, SLC45A2, and TYR explain a large fraction of the pigmentation difference among individuals with high and low skin reflectance.
“In this study, three genes, SLC24A5, SLC45A2, and TYR were found to explain a large fraction of the pigmentation difference among individuals with high and low skin reflectance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] RP Stokowski, 2007, A genomewide association study of skin pigmentation in a South Asian population, American journal of human genetics source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Skin color is less amenable than hair or eye color to subjective categorization and self-report.
“Skin color is less amenable than hair or eye color to subjective categorization and self-report”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The false positive association between the LCT locus and skin pigmentation mirrors the false positive association found between the LCT locus and height.
“This false positive association between the LCT locus and skin pigmentation mirrors the false positive association found between the LCT locus and height [31], [32].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Previous studies have shown that more than 1,000 ancestry-informative markers are needed to derive the first two genetic PCs of European structure adequately representing the North/South and East/West axes of differentiation.
“Previous studies have shown that more than 1,000 ancestry-informative markers are needed to derive the first two genetic PCs of European structure adequately representing the North/South and East/West axes of differentiation [32], [48].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [32] AL Price, 2008, Discerning the ancestry of European Americans in genetic association studies, PLoS genetics source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [48] C Tian, 2008, Analysis and application of European genetic substructure using 300 K SNP information, PLoS genetics source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
For hair color, the study had 80% power to detect a genetic effect explaining 29% of the phenotypic variation.
“For hair color, we had 80% power to detect a genetic effect explaining 29% of the phenotypic variation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In a large GWAS based on subjective categorization of hair color, the strongest genetic effect detected was also at rs12913832.
“In a large GWAS based on subjective categorization of hair color [9], the strongest genetic effect detected was also at rs12913832.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] J Han, 2008, A genome-wide association study identifies novel alleles associated with hair color and skin pigmentation, PLoS genetics source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given
For the spectroscopic measurement of skin pigmentation, the study had 80% power to detect an effect that explains 19% of the variance in the phenotype.
“For the spectroscopic measurement of skin pigmentation, we had 80% power to detect an effect that explains 19% of the variance in the phenotype.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
For such a strong genetic effect, the sample size of the GWAS has 100% power to detect the association at this locus.
“For such a strong genetic effect, the sample size of our GWAS has 100% power to detect the association at this locus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The results in populations of European ancestry contradict earlier anthropological studies that concluded females are more lightly pigmented than males in most populations.
“Our results in populations of European ancestry contradict earlier anthropological studies that have concluded females are more lightly pigmented than males in most populations (reviewed in [2]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] NG Jablonski, 2000, The evolution of human skin coloration, Journal of human evolution source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The persistence of the association of rs12913832 with hair pigmentation after correcting for eye color argues in favor of a model in which rs12913832 has a pleiotropic effect on both eye and hair color.
“This argues in favor of a model in which rs12913832 has a pleiotropic effect on both eye and hair color.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The correlation among the three pigmentary phenotypes may result from the existence of shared or linked genetic determinants of multiple pigmentation phenotypes, such as rs12913832 in HERC2.
“This correlation may result from the existence of shared or linked genetic determinants of multiple pigmentation phenotypes, such as rs12913832 in HERC2, which was shown to be very strongly associated with eye color but more weakly associated with hair color [9], [34].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [9] J Han, 2008, A genome-wide association study identifies novel alleles associated with hair color and skin pigmentation, PLoS genetics source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] RA Sturm, 2008, A single SNP in an evolutionary conserved region within intron 86 of the HERC2 gene determines human blue-brown eye color, American journal of human genetics source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premiseown data
rs1042602 in TYR is highly polymorphic in Europe (43% frequency for the derived allele in CEU, 37% frequency in the GWAS).
“In contrast to the rare SNPs in SLC24A5 and SLC45A2, rs1042602 in TYR is highly polymorphic in Europe (43% frequency for the derived allele in CEU, 37% frequency in our GWAS).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The selection of four distinct European population samples from the corners of the continent and the exclusion of persons with known ancestry outside these countries are expected to align the PC-based and country-based ancestry scores.
“Although the country based correction proved adequate in this particular instance, it is important to remember that this selection of four distinct European population samples from the corners of the continent and our exclusion of persons with known ancestry outside these countries, are expected to align the PC-based and country-based ancestry scores.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 55
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 32
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAverage skin pigmentation differs among countries, with the exception of the Poland vs. Portugal comparison.
“With the exception of the Poland vs. Portugal comparison, average skin pigmentation is also different among countries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor hair color, individuals reporting red hair have the lowest median M index (median M = 73), followed by blond (median M = 101) and then brown or black (median M = 124).
“individuals reporting red hair color have the lowest median M index (median M = 73), followed by blond (median M = 101) and then brown or black (median M = 124)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSex explains 10.3%, 0.0%, and 0.0% of the phenotypic variance in skin, hair, and eye pigmentation, respectively.
“explaining only 10.3%, 0.0%, and 0.0% of the phenotypic variance in skin, hair, and eye pigmentation, respectively”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCountry of sampling explains approximately 35% of the variation in skin pigmentation, 31% in hair pigmentation, and 40% in eye pigmentation.
“The country of sampling explains approximately 35% of the variation in skin pigmentation, 31% of the variation in hair pigmentation, and 40% of the variation in eye pigmentation.”
- Also stated in: § Stratification of the Phenotypes · plain
“Country of origin explains 35.3%, 30.8%, and 39.7% of the variation in the skin, hair, and eye pigmentation, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Stratification of the Phenotypes · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCountry explains 4.9% of the variance in height, while sex explains 45.8% of the variance in height.
“country explains only 4.9% of the variance in height, while sex explains 45.8% of the variance in height”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe C' score for eye pigmentation has a bimodal distribution (n = 468).
“The C’ score for eye pigmentation has a bimodal distribution (Figure 1E, n = 468).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor eye pigmentation, the two modes of the C' distribution correspond to blue and brown eye color, while green and hazel eye color correspond to intermediate C' scores.
“the two modes of the C’ distribution correspond to blue and brown eye color, while green and hazel eye color correspond to intermediate C’ scores”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHair pigmentation differs among all countries, most differentiated between Northern and Southern Europe.
“While hair pigmentation differs among all countries, it is most differentiated between Northern and Southern Europe”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe median C' scores for blue, green, hazel, and brown self-reported eye colors were 0.69, 1.55, 2.07, and 2.25, respectively.
“The median C’ scores for blue, green, hazel, and brown self-reported eye colors were 0.69, 1.55, 2.07, and 2.25, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPC3 separates Portugal from Ireland and Italy, while Poland has more intermediary values on PC3.
“PC3 separates Portugal from Ireland and Italy, while Poland has more intermediary values on PC3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost participants cluster by country of sampling, while ten individuals are found between the clusters formed by each country.
“most participants cluster by country of sampling while ten individuals are found between the clusters formed by each country”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe derived allele frequency of the imputed rs12913832 is 0.90, 0.83, 0.59 and 0.44 and the genetic effect of rs12913832 explains 20%, 42%, 12%, and 33% of the variance in quantitative eye color in the GWAS sample from Ireland, Poland, Italy, and Portugal, respectively.
“The derived allele frequency of the imputed rs12913832 is 0.90, 0.83, 0.59 and 0.44 and the genetic effect of rs12913832 explains 20%, 42%, 12%, and 33% of the variance in quantitative eye color in our GWAS sample from Ireland, Poland, Italy, and Portugal, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe two population-structure correction methods, country of sampling and genetic PCs, produce highly correlated test statistics and overlapping top association signals.
“The two methods produce highly correlated test statistics and overlapping top association signals (see Material and Methods)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe five reproducibly associated SNPs are rs1667394, rs8039195, rs1635168, rs16950987, and rs8028689, spanning a 46kb interval.
“These five SNPs are rs1667394, rs8039195, rs1635168, rs16950987, and rs8028689. They span a 46kb interval.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown datars1667394 is located 186 kb 5′ of OCA2 first exon and within an HERC2 intron and is in linkage disequilibrium with the other four SNPs (r2 = 0.91, 0.46, 0.39, and 0.39 with rs8039195, rs1635168, rs16950987, and rs8028689, respectively in HapMap release 27 CEU).
“It is located 186 kb 5′ of OCA2 first exon and within an HERC2 intron and is in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with the other four SNPs (r2 = 0.91, 0.46, 0.39, and 0.39 with rs8039195, rs1635168, rs16950987, and rs8028689, respectively in HapMap release 27 CEU).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCountry of sampling explains 38.6%, 24.8%, and 34.5% of the variation in skin, hair, and eye pigmentation, respectively, in the same samples.
“Country of sampling explains a similarly large fraction of variation in the phenotypes of the same samples: 38.6%, 24.8% and 34.5% of the variation in skin, hair, and eye pigmentation respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe percent variance explained is greatest in Poland, where there is the largest variation in eye color.
“The percent variance explained is greatest in Poland, where there is the largest variation in eye color.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhile the study does not identify novel genetic determinants of pigmentation, it demonstrates the extensive stratification of pigmentary phenotypes in Europe along the major axes of genetic variation.
“While our study does not identify novel genetic determinants of pigmentation, it does demonstrate the extensive stratification of pigmentary phenotypes in Europe along the major axes of genetic variation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the GWAS, the p-value for the association of hair pigmentation with imputed rs12913832 is 0.01, and after correcting for eye color, the p-value is 0.02.
“In our GWAS, the p-value for the association of hair pigmentation with imputed rs12913832 is 0.01. After correcting for eye color, the p-value is 0.02.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown datars1042602 is associated with freckles in Europeans but the study does not find evidence for its association with skin pigmentation (p = 0.3).
“It is associated with freckles in Europeans [13] but we do not find evidence for its association with skin pigmentation in our study (p = 0.3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] P Sulem, 2007, Genetic determinants of hair, eye and skin pigmentation in Europeans, Nature genetics source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown datars183671 shows some evidence of association with skin pigmentation (p = 6×10−4, n = 289), and each copy of the derived allele lightens the skin by 1.2 M index units, further arguing for an effect of SLC45A2 on European skin pigmentation variation.
“We found that this SNP shows some evidence of association with skin pigmentation (p = 6×10−4, n = 289), and that each copy of the derived allele lightens the skin by 1.2 M index units, further arguing for an effect of SLC45A2 on European skin pigmentation variation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIn this European sample, pigmentation phenotypes are mainly stratified by country, whereas height is mainly stratified by sex.
“in this European sample, pigmentation phenotypes are mainly stratified by country, whereas height is mainly stratified by sex”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataReplication of the most significant GWAS association signals was attempted in 294 individuals (104 Irish, 27 Polish, 64 Italian, and 99 Portuguese; 153 males and 141 females).
“Replication of the most significant GWAS association signals was attempted in 294 individuals (104 Irish, 27 Polish, 64 Italian, and 99 Portuguese; 153 males and 141 females)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn total, 313,763 SNPs were analyzed in 176 individuals for the genome-wide association study.
“In total, 313,763 SNPs were analyzed in 176 individuals for the genome-wide association study (GWAS).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataEmpirical p-values were obtained by permuting the phenotypes within each country of sampling 10,000,000 times for all GWAS association signals with linear model p-value<10−4.
“empirical p-values were also obtained by permuting the phenotypes within each country of sampling 10,000,000 times for all GWAS association signals with linear model p-value<10−4”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAn exact test of deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was implemented for each SNP in the four population samples.
“an exact test of deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was implemented for each SNP in the four population samples”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenOne individual with >10% missing data and three individuals that were genetic outliers in the population structure analyses were excluded from all analyses.
“One individual with >10% missing data and three individuals that were genetic outliers in the population structure analyses were also excluded from all analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe permuted p-values for the top hits of the skin (rs9809315), hair (rs262825), and eye pigmentation (rs1667394) GWAS were 1×10−7, 6.3×10−6, and <1×10−7, respectively.
“The permuted p-values for the top hits of the skin (rs9809315), hair (rs262825), and eye pigmentation (rs1667394) GWAS were 1×10−7, 6.3×10−6, and <1×10−7, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenSNPs with missing rate >10%, maf <0.01, and p-values<0.01 in at least two populations for a test of deviation from HWE were excluded.
“SNPs with missing rate >10%, maf <0.01, and p-values<0.01 in at least two populations for a test of deviation from HWE were excluded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenPrincipal components were calculated based on a set of 263,607 SNPs that had been subjected to higher quality control than the SNPs considered for the GWAS.
“Principal components were calculated based on a set of 263,607 SNPs that had been subjected to higher quality control than the SNPs considered for the GWAS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationKnown loci explain approximately 20-30% of the phenotypic variance for black to blond hair color and 40-60% for eye color in Europeans, with the remaining phenotypic variation unexplained.
“approximately 20–30% for black to blond hair color and 40–60% for eye color, the remaining phenotypic variation in these traits remains unexplained [8], [9], [11].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8], [9], [11]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe Pearson correlation between all-sample allele frequency in the GWAS and replication samples was high (r = 0.97).
“The Pearson correlation between all-sample allele frequency in the GWAS and replication samples was high (r = 0.97).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe genomic control lambda factors for the skin, hair and eye pigmentation GWAS were each close to 1 and there was no systematic deviation from expectation in the Q-Q plots.
“The genomic control lambda factors for the skin, hair and eye pigmentation GWAS were each close to 1 and there was no systematic deviation from expectation (the diagonal) in the Q-Q plots.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThree individuals, one recruited in Ireland and two in Portugal, were clearly outliers within their group by nearest neighbor analysis and were removed from all association testing.
“Three individuals, one recruited in Ireland and two in Portugal, were clearly outliers within their group (z score <−3 for first to fifth nearest neighbor). These individuals were removed from all association testing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationVariation between red and non-red hair color is explained by variation at MC1R and ASIP.
“between red and non-red hair color by variation at MC1R and ASIP (reviewed in [14])”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] MR Gerstenblith, 2010, Genome-wide association studies of pigmentation and skin cancer: a review and meta-analysis, Pigment cell & melanoma research source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe alignment of the first two genetic PCs with geography and the clustering of individuals by European country are consistent with the results of a previous larger study of European genetic structure.
“The alignment of the first two genetic PCs with geography and the clustering of individuals by European country are consistent with the results of a previous larger study of European genetic structure [28].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] J Novembre, 2008, Genes mirror geography within Europe, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe strong linear relationship between global skin pigmentation variation and latitude/UV radiation levels is thought to result from UV-mediated vitamin D synthesis, folate photolysis, sunburn, and skin cancer.
“The strong linear relationship between global skin pigmentation variation and latitude/UV radiation levels is thought to result from UV-mediated vitamin D synthesis, folate photolysis, sunburn, and skin cancer [2]–[5].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2]–[5]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataTwo participants genotyped in duplicate showed good concordance of the genotypes (99.97% on average).
“two participants were genotyped in duplicate and showed good concordance of the genotypes (99.97% on average)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe GWAS p-values corrected for population structure by country of sampling and by the first three genetic PCs were similar; the Pearson correlation coefficients between the linear model t-statistics from the two GWAS results are 0.96, 0.97, and 0.96 for the skin, hair, and eye pigmentation scans, respectively.
“The Pearson correlation coefficients between the linear model t-statistics from the two GWAS results are 0.96, 0.97, and 0.96 for the skin, hair, and eye pigmentation scans, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe inner upper arm was chosen as a site of sampling to avoid as much as possible confounding by variable sun exposure and variability in tanning ability.
“The inner upper arm was chosen as a site of sampling to avoid as much as possible confounding by variable sun exposure and variability in tanning ability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGlobal-level variation in skin color is likely driven primarily by natural (ecological) selection in response to UV radiation levels.
“For skin color, global-level variation is likely driven primarily by natural (ecological) selection in response to UV radiation levels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2]–[5]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThere were 186 SNPs that had a p-value <0.01 in two or more populations, none of which were part of the replication set.
“There were 186 SNPs that had a p-value <0.01 in two or more populations, none of which were part of the replication set.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenTwo SNPs on chromosome X with heterozygous genotypes in males were excluded.
“Two SNPs on chromosome X with heterozygous genotypes in males were also excluded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningBased on quality control criteria, genotypes were obtained for 21, 26, and 34 of the SNPs selected from the results of the skin, hair, and eye pigmentation GWAS respectively.
“genotypes were obtained for 21, 26, and 34 of the SNPs selected from the results of the skin, hair, and eye pigmentation GWAS respectively”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThere is no obvious ecological selective pressure to explain the variation of hair and eye color or local variation in skin pigmentation.
“Unlike for global skin pigmentation, there is no obvious ecological selective pressure to explain the variation of hair and eye color or local variation in skin pigmentation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenSNPs with a minor allele frequency <1% or >10% missing rate were excluded from the analysis.
“SNPs with a minor allele frequency (maf) <1% or >10% missing rate were excluded from the analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSkin pigmentation forms a gradient correlated with latitude, and variation in hair and eye color is particularly extensive in Europe.
“Skin pigmentation forms a gradient correlated with latitude, and variation in hair and eye color is particularly extensive in Europe (reviewed in [1]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Parra EJ (2007) Human pigmentation variation: evolution, genetic basis, and implications for public health. American journal of physical anthropology Suppl 45: 85–105. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAge was not correlated with any of the pigmentation traits, most likely due to the narrow age range in the study.
“Age was not correlated with any of the pigmentation traits most likely due to the narrow age range in our study”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe derived allele (G) at rs12913832 is recessive and is associated with blue eye color.
“The derived allele (G) at rs12913832 is recessive and is associated with blue eye color.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] H Eiberg, 2008, Blue eye color in humans may be caused by a perfectly associated founder mutation in a regulatory element located within the HERC2 gene inhibiting OCA2 expression, Human genetics source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] RA Sturm, 2008, A single SNP in an evolutionary conserved region within intron 86 of the HERC2 gene determines human blue-brown eye color, American journal of human genetics source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe four countries (Ireland, Poland, Italy, Portugal), located near the geographical extremes of Europe, capture a large fraction of European phenotypic variation.
“These countries, located near the geographical extremes of Europe, were chosen to capture a large fraction of European phenotypic variation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe existing signal at rs1667394 was abolished (p = 0.73) after adjusting for the recessive effect of rs12913832, indicating that rs1667394 and rs12913832 likely represent the same association signal.
“Furthermore the existing signal at rs1667394 was abolished (p = 0.73), indicating that rs1667394 and rs12913832 likely represent the same association signal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLiu et al. report that quantitation improved the power to detect association signals at some known pigmentation genes and facilitated the identification of two novel replicated eye color loci at 17q25 and 21q22.
“These authors report that the quantitation improved the power to detect the association signals at some known pigmentation genes and also facilitated the identification of two novel replicated eye color loci at 17q25 and 21q22.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] F Liu, 2010, Digital quantification of human eye color highlights genetic association of three new loci, PLoS genetics source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe Bonferroni correction was applied and the genome-wide 5% significance threshold was considered to be a p-value <1.6×10−7 (0.05/313,763).
“To account for multiple testing, the Bonferroni correction was applied and the genome-wide 5% significance threshold was considered to be a p-value <1.6×10−7 (0.05/313,763).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitationrs12913832 is a strong predictor of eye color; it alone explains 44-48% of the variance in quantitative measures of eye color in Dutch Europeans.
“rs12913832 is a strong predictor of eye color; it alone explains 44–48% of the variance in quantitative measures of eye color in Dutch Europeans [11].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] F Liu, 2010, Digital quantification of human eye color highlights genetic association of three new loci, PLoS genetics source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataTwenty-one, 26, and 34 of the candidate SNPs passed the genotyping quality control for the skin, hair, and eye pigmentation replication, respectively, and these include the top association signals of the three GWAS.
“Twenty-one, 26, and 34 of the candidate SNPs passed the genotyping quality control for the skin, hair, and eye pigmentation replication, respectively, and these include the top association signals of the three GWAS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitationrs1667394 is located in an intron of HERC2 near the OCA2 gene, the major locus determining eye color, and has been reproducibly associated with eye color.
“rs1667394 is located in an intron of HERC2 near the OCA2 gene, the major locus determining eye color and this SNP has been reproducibly associated with eye color [13].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] P Sulem, 2007, Genetic determinants of hair, eye and skin pigmentation in Europeans, Nature genetics source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningTo avoid confounding by population structure at the replication stage, only 294 individuals (153 males and 141 females) who reported that all four grandparents had ancestry in the countries of sampling were considered.
“To avoid confounding by population structure at the replication stage, we only considered 294 individuals (153 males and 141 females), who reported that all of their four grandparents had ancestry in the countries of sampling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataConsidering the number of loci for the Bonferroni correction (18, 24, and 26 for skin, hair and eye pigmentation) instead of the number of SNPs leads to a less conservative correction but to identical conclusions.
“Considering the number of loci for the Bonferroni correction (18, 24, and 26 for skin, hair and eye pigmentation) instead of the number of SNPs leads to a less conservative correction but to identical conclusions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataNot accounting for European population structure, particularly when phenotypes are stratified along axes of genetic differentiation, leads to highly significant false positive results (LCT locus for skin pigmentation) or inflated true positive results (OCA2/HERC2 locus for eye pigmentation).
“These results demonstrate that not accounting for European population structure, particularly in this situation where the phenotypes are stratified along axes of genetic differentiation, leads to highly significant false positive results (LCT locus for skin pigmentation) or inflated true positive results (OCA2/HERC2 locus for eye pigmentation) (Figure S2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe use of categories necessarily results in a loss of information, leading to a loss of statistical power to detect genetic effects.
“The use of categories necessarily results in a loss of information, leading to a loss of statistical power to detect genetic effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSince the GWAS included only females, an analysis considering only females obtained qualitatively identical conclusions: no SNP is reproducibly associated with skin or hair pigmentation, while five SNPs at the OCA2/HERC2 locus are reproducibly associated with eye pigmentation in the replication female-only cohort.
“Since the GWAS included only females, we also performed the analysis considering only the females and obtained qualitatively identical conclusions: no SNP is reproducibly associated with skin or hair pigmentation, while five SNPs at the OCA2/HERC2 locus are reproducibly associated with eye pigmentation in the replication female only cohort.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitationrs1667394 is also in LD with rs12913832 (D' = 1, r2 = 0.65), which was not genotyped in the study but is thought to be the likely causative variant for blue versus brown eye color by genetic and functional analyses.
“rs1667394 is also in LD with rs12913832 (D’ = 1, r2 = 0.65), which was not genotyped in our study but is thought to be the likely causative variant for blue versus brown eye color by genetic and functional analyses [33], [34].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] H Eiberg, 2008, Blue eye color in humans may be caused by a perfectly associated founder mutation in a regulatory element located within the HERC2 gene inhibiting OCA2 expression, Human genetics source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] RA Sturm, 2008, A single SNP in an evolutionary conserved region within intron 86 of the HERC2 gene determines human blue-brown eye color, American journal of human genetics source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSkin, hair, and eye color are all quantitative traits, and their true distributions are only approximated by categories.
“Skin, hair, and eye color are in fact all three quantitative traits, and their true distributions are only approximated by categories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataObjective and quantitative phenotyping has the potential to improve the power to detect a genetic effect compared to GWAS based on subjective categorical phenotypes, but due to small sample size the study was only sufficiently powered to identify the major genetic effect of the HERC2/OCA2 locus on eye color.
“Objective and quantitative phenotyping has the potential to improve the power to detect a genetic effect compared to GWAS based on subjective categorical phenotypes, but due to small sample size our study was only sufficiently powered to identify the major genetic effect of the HERC2/OCA2 locus on eye color.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The small sample size explains why the GWAS p-values for other causative loci are not clearly smaller than those expected by chance.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe fact that the study did not detect reproducible associations with skin or hair color suggests that, unlike eye color, skin and hair pigmentation variation in Europe are not determined by major loci.
“The fact that we did not detect reproducible associations with skin or hair color suggests that, unlike eye color, skin and hair pigmentation variation in Europe are not determined by major loci.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The small sample size explains why the GWAS p-values for other causative loci are not clearly smaller than those expected by chance.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationOther eye color loci reported have been estimated each to explain less than 1% of the phenotypic variation, for which the GWAS sample size is under-powered.
“In contrast, other eye color loci reported [11] have been estimated each to explain less than 1% of the phenotypic variation, for which our GWAS sample size is under-powered.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] F Liu, 2010, Digital quantification of human eye color highlights genetic association of three new loci, PLoS genetics source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationOne potential reason for the conflicting results is the different instruments used: in early studies using EEL and Photovolt broad-spectrum spectrophotometers, skin pigmentation estimates may be confounded by hemoglobin level to a greater extent than for the DermaSpectrometer used in the present study.
“One potential reason for the conflicting results is the different instruments used. In early studies, which used the Evans Electric Limited (EEL) and Photovolt broad-spectrum spectrophotometers, skin pigmentation estimates may be confounded by the hemoglobin level to a greater extent than for the DermaSpectrometer used in the present study [46].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] H Takiwaki, 1998, Measurement of skin color: practical application and theoretical considerations, J Med Invest
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitationrs16891982 in SLC45A2 (98% frequency in CEU for the derived allele) may contribute to skin pigmentation differences in Europe as suggested in a candidate gene study for subjective skin color.
“This variant (98% frequency in CEU for the derived allele) may contribute to skin pigmentation differences in Europe as suggested in a candidate gene study for subjective skin color [39].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] J Graf, 2005, Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the MATP gene are associated with normal human pigmentation variation, Human mutation source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationDifferences in skin pigmentation between sexes are likely population specific: whereas DermaSpectrometer M index measurements in this study show European males to have lighter skin pigmentation than European females, measurements in Island Melanesian, African Caribbeans, and African Americans have shown that in these populations males have darker skin pigmentation than females.
“Lastly, we emphasize that differences in skin pigmentation between sexes are likely population specific. Whereas DermaSpectrometer M index measurements in this study show European males to have lighter skin pigmentation than European females, DermaSpectrometer M index measurements of skin pigmentation in Island Melanesian, African Caribbeans, and African Americans have shown that in these populat”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [6] HL Norton, 2006, Skin and hair pigmentation variation in Island Melanesia, Am J Phys Anthropol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [38] MD Shriver, 2003, Skin pigmentation, biogeographical ancestry and admixture mapping, Human genetics source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [47] C Bonilla, 2005, The 8818G allele of the agouti signaling protein (ASIP) gene is ancestral and is associated with darker skin color in African Americans, Hum Genet source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn candidate gene studies, R163Q has shown either no association, or association of the minor, derived allele (Q variant) with lighter skin pigmentation.
“In candidate gene studies, R163Q has shown either no association, or association of the minor, derived allele (Q variant) with lighter skin pigmentation [41]–[45].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41]–[45]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe same trend in M index was reported previously in a sample of European Americans.
“The same trend in M index was reported previously in a sample of European Americans [38].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] MD Shriver, 2003, Skin pigmentation, biogeographical ancestry and admixture mapping, Human genetics source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataNot correcting for ancestry leads to an overestimation of the effect of pigmentation genes, like the HERC2/OCA2 locus for eye color, or results in a false positive association of loci that have differentiated along the same geographical axes, e.g. the strong association of variation at the lactase gene (LCT) with skin color that the study observed.
“Not correcting for ancestry leads to an overestimation of the effect of the pigmentation genes, like the HERC2/OCA2 locus for eye color, or results in a false positive association of loci that have differentiated along the same geographical axes, e.g. the strong association of variation at the lactase gene (LCT) with skin color that we observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis genetic factor explains 10.7% of the blond to black variation in hair color in populations of European ancestry, requiring a sample size of 327 to achieve 80% power.
“This genetic factor explains 10.7% of the blond to black variation in hair color in populations of European ancestry, requiring a sample size of 327 to achieve 80% power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] J Han, 2008, A genome-wide association study identifies novel alleles associated with hair color and skin pigmentation, PLoS genetics source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn Europe, variation at rs1426654 in SLC24A5 does not contribute to skin pigmentation differences since the derived allele associated with light skin pigmentation has been swept to fixation (100% frequency in HapMap CEU).
“In Europe, variation at rs1426654 in SLC24A5 does not contribute to skin pigmentation differences since the derived allele associated with light skin pigmentation has been swept to fixation (100% frequency in HapMap CEU).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn candidate gene association studies, these three variants have been shown to contribute to quantified skin pigmentation variation in admixed European/African populations.
“In candidate gene association studies, these three variants have been shown to contribute to quantified skin pigmentation variation in admixed European/African populations [4], [36]–[38].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] HL Norton, 2007, Genetic evidence for the convergent evolution of light skin in Europeans and East Asians, Molecular biology and evolution source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [36]–[38]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMC1R is an extensively studied human pigmentation gene whose variants have been associated with red hair, fair skin, sun sensitivity, and freckling in populations of European ancestry.
“MC1R is an extensively studied human pigmentation gene whose variants have been associated with red hair, fair skin, sun sensitivity, and freckling in populations of European ancestry (see [40] for a review).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] C Dessinioti, 2011, Melanocortin 1 receptor variants: functional role and pigmentary associations, Photochemistry and photobiology source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Stokowski et al. GWAS showed that non-synonymous variants in three genes, rs1426654 SLC24A5, rs16891982 SLC45A2, and rs1042602 TYR, contribute to differences in spectroscopic skin pigmentation measurements in South Asians.
“However our results can be compared to the Stokowski et al. [17] GWAS, which showed that non-synonymous variants in three genes, rs1426654 SLC24A5, rs16891982 SLC45A2, and rs1042602 TYR, contribute to differences in spectroscopic skin pigmentation measurements in South Asians.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] RP Stokowski, 2007, A genomewide association study of skin pigmentation in a South Asian population, American journal of human genetics source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningOne should be careful about generalizing the finding that country-based correction performs equivalently to PC-based correction to other more heterogeneous samples like larger pan-European and European-American samples.
“One should be careful about generalizing this finding to other more heterogeneous sample like larger pan-European and European-American samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
Each copy of the minor allele has the same additive effect on the phenotype.
“where each copy of the minor allele was assumed to have the same additive effect on the phenotype”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The small sample size explains why the GWAS p-values for other causative loci are not clearly smaller than those expected by chance.
“Because our method detects the strong genetic effect of the OCA2/HERC2 locus on eye pigmentation, it is reasonable to assume that our small sample size explains why our GWAS p-values for other causative loci are not clearly smaller than those expected by chance.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The skin pigmentation phenotype has not been the subject of a genome-wide scan in Europeans using an objectively quantified measure of skin color.
“The skin pigmentation phenotype was of particular interest in our study since it is a continuously distributed phenotype that, to our knowledge, has not been the subject of a genome-wide scan in Europeans using an objectively quantified measure of skin color.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Neither SCIN nor FLNB has been implicated in pigmentation.
“To our knowledge, neither SCIN nor FLNB has been implicated in pigmentation.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MM in individuals of European ancestry is smaller and more narrowly distributed, with mean 5.38 and SD 0.27.
“By comparison, MM in individuals of European ancestry is smaller and much more narrowly distributed, with a mean of 5.38 and standard deviation of 0.27 [23].”
From Genetic Architecture of Skin and Eye Color in an African-European Admixed Population (2013) · cites this paper as [23]
Cites
PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.
Purcell, S., Neale, B., Todd-Brown, K., Thomas, L., Ferreira, M. A. R., Bender, D., Maller, J., Sklar, P., de Bakker, P. I. W., Daly, M. J., et al. (2007) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/519795 · Cited by 34,089 · see citing works
Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps
Barrett, J., Fry, B., Maller, J., & Daly, M. (2005) · Bioinform. · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457 · Cited by 15,086 · see citing works
Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls
The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Management Committee, Burton, P. R., Clayton, D. G., Cardon, L. R., Craddock, N., Deloukas, P., Duncanson, A., Kwiatkowski, D. P., McCarthy, M. I., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05911 · Cited by 9,442 · see citing works
Population Structure and Eigenanalysis
Patterson, N., Price, A. L., & Reich, D. (2006) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020190 · Cited by 5,280 · see citing works
The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, U.K.
Mossman, K. (2008) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0108-42a · Cited by 2,714 · see citing works
Purcell, S., Cherny, S. S., & Sham, P. C. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/19.1.149 · Cited by 2,057 · see citing works
MaCH: using sequence and genotype data to estimate haplotypes and unobserved genotypes
Li, Y., Willer, C. J., Ding, J., Scheet, P., & Abecasis, G. R. (2010) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.20533 · Cited by 1,843 · see citing works
Genes mirror geography within Europe
Novembre, J., Johnson, T., Bryc, K., Kutalik, Z., Boyko, A. R., Auton, A., Indap, A., King, K. S., Bergmann, S., Nelson, M. R., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07331 · Cited by 1,479 · see citing works
The evolution of human skin coloration
Jablonski, N. G., & Chaplin, G. (2000) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1006/jhev.2000.0403 · Cited by 1,212 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Our results in populations of European ancestry contradict earlier anthropological studies that have concluded females are more lightly pigmented than males in most populations (reviewed in [2]).”
BackgroundResultSLC24A5, a putative cation exchanger, affects pigmentation in zebrafish and humans
Lamason, R. L., Mohideen, M.-A. P. K., Mest, J. R., Wong, A. C., Norton, H. L., Aros, M. C., Jurynec, M. J., Mao, X., Humphreville, V. R., Humbert, J. E., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1116238 · Cited by 1,043 · see citing works
Self-citationLi, Y., Willer, C., Sanna, S., & Abecasis, G. (2009) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164242 · Cited by 990 · see citing works
Genetic determinants of hair, eye and skin pigmentation in Europeans
Sulem, P., Gudbjartsson, D. F., Stacey, S. N., Helgason, A., Rafnar, T., Magnusson, K. P., Manolescu, A., Karason, A., Palsson, A., Thorleifsson, G., et al. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2007.13 · Cited by 750 · see citing works
Human skin pigmentation as an adaptation to UV radiation
Jablonski, N. G., & Chaplin, G. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0914628107 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
Signals of recent positive selection in a worldwide sample of human populations
Pickrell, J. K., Coop, G., Novembre, J., Kudaravalli, S., Li, J. Z., Absher, D., Srinivasan, B. S., Barsh, G. S., Myers, R. M., Feldman, M. W., et al. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.087577.108 · Cited by 717 · see citing works
Self-citationSkin pigmentation, biogeographical ancestry and admixture mapping
Shriver, M. D., Parra, E. J., Dios, S., Bonilla, C., Norton, H., Jovel, C., Pfaff, C., Jones, C., Massac, A., Cameron, N., et al. (2003) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-002-0896-y · Cited by 549 · see citing works
Self-citationHan, J., Kraft, P., Nan, H., Guo, Q., Chen, C., Qureshi, A., Hankinson, S. E., Hu, F. B., Duffy, D. L., Zhao, Z. Z., et al. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000074 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Control of confounding of genetic associations in stratified populations
Hoggart, C. J., Parra, E. J., Shriver, M. D., Bonilla, C., Kittles, R. A., Clayton, D. G., & McKeigue, P. M. (2003) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/375613 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Self-citationWeb-Based, Participant-Driven Studies Yield Novel Genetic Associations for Common Traits
Eriksson, N., Macpherson, J. M., Tung, J. Y., Hon, L., Naughton, B., Saxonov, S., Avey, L., Wojcicki, A., Pe’er, I., & Mountain, J. L. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000993 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Demonstrating stratification in a European American population
Campbell, C. D., Ogburn, E. L., Lunetta, K. L., Lyon, H. N., Freedman, M. L., Groop, L. C., Altshuler, D., Ardlie, K. G., & Hirschhorn, J. N. (2005) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1607 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Genetic evidence for the convergent evolution of light skin in Europeans and East Asians
Norton, H. L., Kittles, R. A., Parra, E., McKeigue, P., Mao, X., Cheng, K., Canfield, V. A., Bradley, D. G., McEvoy, B., & Shriver, M. D. (2006) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msl203 · Cited by 410 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The strong linear relationship between global skin pigmentation variation and latitude/UV radiation levels is thought to result from UV-mediated vitamin D synthesis, folate photolysis, sunburn, and skin cancer [2–5].”
BackgroundSelf-citationKennedy, C., ter Huurne, J., Berkhout, M., Gruis, N. A., Bastiaens, M. T., Bergman, W., Willemze, R., & Bavinck, J. N. B. (2001) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01421.x · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Sturm, R. A., Duffy, D. L., Zhao, Z. Z., Leite, F. P. N., Stark, M. S., Hayward, N. K., Martin, N. G., & Montgomery, G. W. (2008) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.11.005 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Two newly identified genetic determinants of pigmentation in Europeans
Sulem, P., Gudbjartsson, D. F., Stacey, S. N., Helgason, A., Rafnar, T., Jakobsdottir, M., Steinberg, S., Gudjonsson, S. A., Palsson, A., Thorleifsson, G., et al. (2008) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.160 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Eiberg, H., Troelsen, J., Nielsen, M., Mikkelsen, A., Mengel-From, J., Kjaer, K. W., & Hansen, L. (2008) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-007-0460-x · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Discerning the ancestry of European Americans in genetic association studies
Price, A. L., Butler, J., Patterson, N., Capelli, C., Pascali, V. L., Scarnicci, F., Ruiz-Linares, A., Groop, L., Saetta, A. A., Korkolopoulou, P., et al. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030236 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
A Genomewide Association Study of Skin Pigmentation in a South Asian Population
Stokowski, R. P., Pant, P. V. K., Dadd, T., Fereday, A., Hinds, D. A., Jarman, C., Filsell, W., Ginger, R. S., Green, M. R., van der Ouderaa, F. J., et al. (2007) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/522235 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Estimation of height from the length of long bones in a Portuguese adult population
de Mendonça, M. C. (2000) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-8644(200005)112:1 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Kayser, M., Liu, F., Janssens, A. C. J. W., Rivadeneira, F., Lao, O., van Duijn, K., Vermeulen, M., Arp, P., Jhamai, M. M., van IJcken, W. F. J., et al. (2008) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.10.003 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Interactive effects of MC1R and OCA2 on melanoma risk phenotypes
Duffy, D. L. (2003) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddh043 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Analysis and application of European genetic substructure using 300 K SNP information
Tian, C., Plenge, R. M., Ransom, M., Lee, A., Villoslada, P., Selmi, C., Klareskog, L., Pulver, A. E., Qi, L., Gregersen, P. K., et al. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0040004 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Genetics of human iris colour and patterns
Sturm, R. A., & Larsson, M. (2009) · Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research · doi:10.1111/j.1755-148x.2009.00606.x · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Graf, J., Hodgson, R., & van Daal, A. (2005) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.20143 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Duffy, D. L., Zhao, Z., Sturm, R. A., Hayward, N. K., Martin, N. G., & Montgomery, G. W. (2009) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2009.258 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Genetic variants in pigmentation genes, pigmentary phenotypes, and risk of skin cancer in Caucasians
Nan, H., Kraft, P., Hunter, D. J., & Han, J. (2009) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.24327 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Digital Quantification of Human Eye Color Highlights Genetic Association of Three New Loci
Liu, F., Wollstein, A., Hysi, P. G., Ankra-Badu, G. A., Spector, T. D., Park, D., Zhu, G., Larsson, M., Duffy, D. L., Montgomery, G. W., et al. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000934 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Human pigmentation variation: evolution, genetic basis, and implications for public health
Parra, E. J. (2007) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20727 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Model-based prediction of human hair color using DNA variants
Branicki, W., Liu, F., van Duijn, K., Draus‐Barini, J., Pośpiech, E., Walsh, S., Kupiec, T., Wojas‐Pelc, A., & Kayser, M. (2011) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-010-0939-8 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
DNA-based eye colour prediction across Europe with the IrisPlex system
Walsh, S., Wollstein, A., Liu, F., Chakravarthy, U., Rahu, M., Seland, J. H., Soubrane, G., Tomazzoli, L., Topouzis, F., Vingerling, J. R., et al. (2011) · Forensic Science International Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.07.009 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Bonilla, C., Boxill, L.-A., Donald, S. A. M., Williams, T., Sylvester, N., Parra, E. J., Dios, S., Norton, H. L., Shriver, M. D., & Kittles, R. A. (2005) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-004-1251-2 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Self-citationMeasurement of skin color: practical application and theoretical considerations.
Takiwaki, H. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Genome-wide association studies of pigmentation and skin cancer: a review and meta-analysis
Gerstenblith, M. R., Shi, J., & Landi, M. T. (2010) · Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research · doi:10.1111/j.1755-148x.2010.00730.x · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Association studies for quantitative traits in structured populations
Bacanu, S., Devlin, B., & Roeder, K. (2001) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.1045 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Cook, A. L., Chen, W., Thurber, A. E., Smit, D. J., Smith, A. G., Bladen, T. G., Brown, D. L., Duffy, D. L., Pastorino, L., Bianchi-Scarra, G., et al. (2009) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2008.211 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Melanocortin 1 receptor variants: Functional role and pigmentary associations
Dessinioti, C., Antoniou, C., Katsambas, A., & Stratigos, A. J. (2011) · Photochemistry and Photobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.00970.x · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Multilocus OCA2 genotypes specify human iris colors
Frudakis, T., Terravainen, T., & Thomas, M. J. (2007) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-007-0401-8 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Human skin‐color sexual dimorphism: A test of the sexual selection hypothesis
Madrigal, L., & Kelly, W. A. (2006) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20453 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Genetic Differences between Five European Populations
Moskvina, V., Smith, M., Ivanov, D., Blackwood, D., StClair, D., Hultman, C., Toncheva, D., Gill, M., Corvin, A., O’Dushlaine, C., et al. (2010) · Human Heredity · doi:10.1159/000313854 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Skin and hair pigmentation variation in Island Melanesia
Norton, H. L., Friedlaender, J. S., Merriwether, D. A., Koki, G., Mgone, C. S., & Shriver, M. D. (2006) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20343 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Latreille, J., Ezzedine, K., Elfakir, A., et al. (2009) · Photochemistry and Photobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.2009.00594.x · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Del Bino, S., Duval, C., & Bernerd, F. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19092668 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Genetic Architecture of Skin and Eye Color in an African-European Admixed Population
Beleza, S., Johnson, N. A., Candille, S. I., Absher, D. M., Coram, M. A., Lopes, J., Campos, J., Araújo, I. I., Anderson, T. M., Vilhjálmsson, B. J., et al. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003372 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Self-citationAn Unexpectedly Complex Architecture for Skin Pigmentation in Africans
Martin, A. R., Lin, M., Granka, J. M., Myrick, J. W., Liu, X., Sockell, A., Atkinson, E. G., Werely, C. J., Möller, M., Sandhu, M. S., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.015 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Investigating the case of human nose shape and climate adaptation
Zaidi, A. A., Mattern, B. C., Claes, P., McEcoy, B., Hughes, C., & Shriver, M. D. (2017) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006616 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Self-citationNorton, H. L., Edwards, M., Krithika, S., Johnson, M., Werren, E. A., & Parra, E. J. (2016) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.22861 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Candille, S. I., Absher, D. M., Beleza, S., Bauchet, M., McEvoy, B., Garrison, N. A., Li, J. Z., Myers, R. M., Barsh, G. S., Tang, H., & Shriver, M. D.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Candille, Sophie I.
- Tang, Hua
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-10-31
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e48294
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3485197
- OpenAlex
- W1985389453
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 3.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- University College Dublin
- Trinity College Dublin
- Universidade do Porto
- National Institutes of Health (HG000044)
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BPD/21887/2005)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (HG000044, T32HG000044)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM073059, R01GM073059, F31GM076893)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Keywords
- skin pigmentation, hair pigmentation, eye color, genetic architecture of complex traits, European populations, reflectance spectroscopy, population stratification
- MeSH terms
- Eye, Female, Hair, Humans, Male, Phenotype, Skin Pigmentation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, White People, Genome-Wide Association Study, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review