Cited by 48Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Increased Nerve Density in Deep Infiltrating Endometriotic Nodules

Anaf, V., El Nakadi, I., De Moor, V., Chapron, C., Pistofidis, G., Noel, J.-C.·2011·Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation

Abstract

Background/Aims: Deep infiltrating endometriosis is a very painful condition and the mechanism of pain is still poorly understood. Pain and hyperalgesia can partly be explained by an increased number of nerve structures in the painful lesion. In order to clarify this issue, we assessed the nerve density in deep infiltrating endometriotic nodules of the posterior vagina and in the adjacent healthy vaginal tissue of the same patient. Methods: A prospective clinical and pathological study of 31 cases of deep infiltrating vaginal endometriotic nodules was conducted. Fifteen patients were in the proliferative phase and 16 in the secretory phase. The nerve density was studied by immunohistochemistry with the monoclonal antibody NF against neurofilaments in deep infiltrating endometriosis and in the adjacent unaffected vaginal tissue in the proliferative and in the secretory phases. Neurofilaments constitute the main structural elements of neuronal axons and dendrites. Results: The nerve density was significantly different in the endometriotic nodule than in the adjacent unaffected vaginal tissue (p = 0.0013). The same significant difference was found between endometriotic nodules and the unaffected vagina in the proliferative phase (p = 0.009) and in the secretory phase (p = 0.04). This difference was not significant between the proliferative and the secretory phases in the endometriotic lesions and in the controls. Conclusions: We hypothesize that the significantly increased number of nerve structures in the endometriotic nodules may contribute to the occurrence of severe and neuropathic pain that characterizes these lesions

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000320750

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anaf, V., El Nakadi, I., De Moor, V., Chapron, C., Pistofidis, G., & Noel, J.-C.
Affiliations
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
  • Hôpital Cochin (FR)
Venue
Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2010-12-09
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
112-117
ISSN
  • 0378-7346 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-002X
OpenAlex
W2039446928
Cited by
48
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
deep infiltrating endometriosis, endometriotic nodules, nerve fiber density, neurofilaments, neuropathic pain, hyperalgesia, vaginal endometriosis, menstrual cycle phases, proliferative phase, luteal phase, immunohistochemistry
MeSH terms
Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Nerve Tissue, Prospective Studies, Vagina, Vaginal Diseases, Neurofilament Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review