The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Age Differences in Brain Activity during Emotion Processing: Reflections of Age-Related Decline or Increased Emotion Regulation
Open accessAbstract
Despite the fact that physical health and cognitive abilities decline with aging, the ability to regulate emotion remains stable and in some aspects improves across the adult life span. Older adults also show a positivity effect in their attention and memory, with diminished processing of negative stimuli relative to positive stimuli compared with younger adults. The current paper reviews functional magnetic resonance imaging studies investigating age-related differences in emotional processing and discusses how this evidence relates to two opposing theoretical accounts of older adults’ positivity effect. The aging-brain model [Cacioppo et al. in: Social Neuroscience: Toward Understanding the Underpinnings of the Social Mind. New York, Oxford University Press, 2011] proposes that older adults’ positivity effect is a consequence of age-related decline in the amygdala, whereas the cognitive control hypothesis [Kryla-Lighthall and Mather in: Handbook of Theories of Aging, ed 2. New York, Springer, 2009; Mather and Carstensen: Trends Cogn Sci 2005;9:496–502; Mather and Knight: Psychol Aging 2005;20:554–570] argues that the positivity effect is a result of older adults’ greater focus on regulating emotion. Based on evidence for structural and functional preservation of the amygdala in older adults and findings that older adults show greater prefrontal cortex activity than younger adults while engaging in emotion-processing tasks, we argue that the cognitive control hypothesis is a more likely explanation for older adults’ positivity effect than the aging-brain model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity.
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.54.3.165 · Cited by 5,377
The cognitive control of emotion
OCHSNER, K., & GROSS, J. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010 · Cited by 4,495
Aging and motivated cognition: the positivity effect in attention and memory
Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.005 · Cited by 1,910
Self-citationPrefrontal-Subcortical Pathways Mediating Successful Emotion Regulation
Wager, T. D., Davidson, M. L., Hughes, B. L., Lindquist, M. A., & Ochsner, K. N. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.006 · Cited by 1,761
Selective review of cognitive aging
SALTHOUSE, T. A. (2010) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617710000706 · Cited by 1,166
Aging and attentional biases for emotional faces
Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2003) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01455 · Cited by 808
Self-citationNeural Correlates of Positive and Negative Emotion Regulation
Kim, S. H., & Hamann, S. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.776 · Cited by 615
van Reekum, C. M., Johnstone, T., Urry, H. L., Thurow, M. E., Schaefer, H. S., Alexander, A. L., & Davidson, R. J. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.052 · Cited by 271
Cognitive and neural contributors to emotion regulation in aging
Winecoff, A., LaBar, K. S., Madden, D. J., Cabeza, R., & Huettel, S. A. (2011) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsq030 · Cited by 191
Impaired Judgments of Sadness But Not Happiness Following Bilateral Amygdala Damage
Adolphs, R., & Tranel, D. (2004) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892904322926782 · Cited by 187
Cited by
Ochsner, K. N., Silvers, J. A., & Buhle, J. T. (2012) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06751.x · Cited by 1,879
Mechanisms of motivation–cognition interaction: challenges and opportunities
Braver, T. S., Krug, M. K., Chiew, K. S., Kool, W., Westbrook, J. A., Clement, N. J., Adcock, R. A., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Carver, C. S., et al. (2014) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-014-0300-0 · Cited by 391
Self-citationThe positivity effect: a negativity bias in youth fades with age
Carstensen, L. L., & DeLiema, M. (2018) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.009 · Cited by 359
The emotion paradox in the aging brain
Mather, M. (2012) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06471.x · Cited by 349
Self-citationThe Default Mode Network in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Mak, L. E., Minuzzi, L., MacQueen, G., Hall, G., Kennedy, S. H., & Milev, R. (2017) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2016.0438 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Nashiro, K., Sakaki, M., & Mather, M.
- Venue
- Gerontology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2011-06-21
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 156-163
- ISSN
- 0304-324X (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0003
- OpenAlex
- W2072095540
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 16.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age Differences in Brain Activity during Emotion Processing: Reflections of Age-Related Decline or Increased Emotion Regulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000328465
- The paper
- Nashiro, K., Sakaki, M., & Mather, M. (2012). Age Differences in Brain Activity during Emotion Processing: Reflections of Age-Related Decline or Increased Emotion Regulation. Gerontology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000328465
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
