Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,184

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Role of CT Pulmonary Angiography in the Investigation of Unilateral Pleural Effusions

Open access
Hooper, Clare, Laurence, Isabel, Harvey, John, Morley, Anna, Darby, Mike, Edey, Anthony, Maskell, Nick·2014·Respiration

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is frequently cited as a common primary cause of unilateral pleural effusion, but in clinical practice appears to be uncommon. Objectives: In order to evaluate this observation, CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) was performed in consecutive patients presenting to a single centre with a new uninvestigated unilateral pleural effusion and no clear cause and was supplemented by delayed-phase thoracic CT, optimized for visualization of the pleura. Methods: All patients underwent standard clinical assessment and pleural investigations in line with recent national guidelines and were followed up for a minimum of 1 year or until histological/microbiological diagnosis. Results: One hundred and fifty patients were recruited, and of these, 141 had a CTPA. PEs were detected in 9/141 (6.4%) patients, and of these, 8/9 were subsequently diagnosed with pleural malignancy. In only 1 case was PE clinically suspected and in no case was PE the primary cause of effusion; 9.8% (8/82) of patients who were ultimately diagnosed with pleural malignancy had PE at presentation. Conclusions: This study indicates that PE is a frequent concomitant finding in patients with malignant effusions but uncommon as a primary cause of unilateral effusion. In addition, it highlights the known difficulty of clinical diagnosis of PE in the context of malignancy. In view of this, we recommend that CTPA combined with pleural-phase thoracic CT should be considered at presentation when investigating patients with suspected malignant pleural effusion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000347003

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. 10.1148/radiol.2473070939 · doi:10.1148/radiol.2473070939
  2. 10.1093/qjmed/hcm113 · DOI
  3. 10.1097/00063198-200107000-00006 · doi:10.1097/00063198-200107000-00006
  4. 10.1136/thx.2010.136978 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2008.01345.x · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2008.01345.x
  6. 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.01026.x · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.01026.x
  7. 10.7326/0003-4819-77-4-507 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.2214/ajr.154.3.2106209 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07534-5 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1002/cncr.25941 · DOI
  11. 10.1148/radiol.2452070397 · doi:10.1148/radiol.2452070397
  12. 10.1016/j.crad.2005.05.015 · doi:10.1016/j.crad.2005.05.015
  13. 10.1136/bmj.d947 · DOI
  14. 10.1259/bjr/55980445 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,184

Metadata

Authors
Hooper, C., Laurence, I., Harvey, J., Morley, A., Darby, M., Edey, A., & Maskell, N.
Venue
Respiration
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2013-06-29
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
26-31
ISSN
  • 0025-7931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0356
OpenAlex
W2033150840
Cited by
1,184
References
2
FWCI
62.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role of CT Pulmonary Angiography in the Investigation of Unilateral Pleural Effusions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000347003
The paper
Hooper, C., Laurence, I., Harvey, J., Morley, A., Darby, M., Edey, A., & Maskell, N. (2014). The Role of CT Pulmonary Angiography in the Investigation of Unilateral Pleural Effusions. Respiration. https://doi.org/10.1159/000347003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.