Cited by 462Nutrition and Health in AgingMuscle Physiology and DisordersMuscle metabolism and nutrition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Aging: Diagnosis, Mechanisms and Therapeutic Options - A Mini-Review

Open access
Ali, Sumbul, Garcia, Jose M.·2014·Gerontology

Abstract

By the year 2050, individuals over the age of 65 years will comprise 20% of the US population. Loss of muscle mass and strength is common in this age group and it is associated with increased dependence, frailty and mortality. Sarcopenia, defined as the loss of muscle mass and function associated with aging, and cachexia, defined as weight loss due to an underlying illness, are muscle wasting disorders of particular relevance in the aging population, but they go largely unrecognized. In this review we highlight the common pathophysiological mechanisms underlying muscle loss in sarcopenia and cachexia, the factors unique to each condition and means of diagnosing and differentiating them clinically. Therapeutic options including exercise, nutritional therapy, androgens and growth hormone as well as their practical limitations are discussed. We also shed light on newer agents being developed as potential therapeutic options for wasting diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000356760

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 56 references

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–459 of 459

Metadata

Authors
Ali, S., & Garcia, J. M.
Affiliations
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
Gerontology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2014
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
294-305
ISSN
  • 0304-324X (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0003
OpenAlex
W2124477946
Cited by
462
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 CX000174, I01 BX002807, I01-BX000507)
  • National Institute on Aging (R03AG040583, AG040583, T32AG000183)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
sarcopenia, cachexia, aging, muscle atrophy, muscle mass loss, frailty, pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnosis, exercise therapy, nutritional therapy, androgens, growth hormone
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Androgens, Cachexia, Dietary Proteins, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Muscle Proteins, Receptors, Androgen, Muscle, Skeletal, Appetite Stimulants, Human Growth Hormone, Ghrelin, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review