Cited by 23Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorStress Responses and CortisolPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Serum Oxytocin, Posttraumatic Coping and C-Reactive Protein in Motor Vehicle Accident Survivors by Gender

Nishi, Daisuke, Hashimoto, Kenji, Noguchi, Hiroko, Kim, Yoshiharu, Matsuoka, Yutaka·2015·Neuropsychobiology

Abstract

Background: Previous studies indicate that oxytocin (OT) might play a major role in the prevention of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and that the effects of OT might differ by gender. This exploratory study aimed to clarify the relationships between the OT level and physical and psychosocial factors by gender in accident survivors. Methods: Two hundred and thirty-five accident survivors offered blood samples at baseline, 155 of whom participated in follow-up assessments 1 month later. Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated between the serum OT levels and physical and psychosocial factors assessed at baseline by gender. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were then used to examine the relationships between the serum OT levels and psychological variables by gender. Results: In men, the OT levels were negatively associated with C-reactive protein at baseline and did not predict any psychological variables at the 1-month follow-up. On the other hand, in women, the OT levels were positively associated with cooperativeness at baseline and predicted seeking social support, positive reappraisal, accepting responsibility and planful problem solving at the 1-month follow-up. The OT levels were not associated with PTSD, depression, and anxiety symptoms. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the role of OT in posttraumatic coping and inflammation differs by gender in accident survivors. Gender differences in the effects and mechanism of OT might be a key consideration when developing interventions using OT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000382021

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nishi, D., Hashimoto, K., Noguchi, H., Kim, Y., & Matsuoka, Y.
Affiliations
  • National Disaster Medical Center (JP)
  • Chiba University (JP)
  • National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP)
Venue
Neuropsychobiology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2015
Volume
71
Issue
4
Pages
196-201
ISSN
  • 0302-282X (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0224
OpenAlex
W2220662798
Cited by
23
References
36
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders
  • National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry
  • Pfizer Japan
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
oxytocin, motor vehicle accidents, post-traumatic stress disorder, C-reactive protein, inflammation, gender differences, social support seeking, positive reappraisal, problem solving, depression, anxiety, accident survivors
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, C-Reactive Protein, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Male, Middle Aged, Oxytocin, Sex Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review