Cited by 50Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Restructuring Hedonic Dysregulation in Chronic Pain and Prescription Opioid Misuse: Effects of Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement on Responsiveness to Drug Cues and Natural Rewards

Open access
Garland, Eric L., Howard, Matthew O., Zubieta, Jon-Kar, Froeliger, Brett·2017·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000453400

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increasing physiological responsiveness to natural rewards via mindful savoring predicts decreased prescription opioid misuse and craving.

    “Similarly, evidence that increasing physiological responsiveness to natural rewards via mindful savoring predicts decreased prescription opioid misuse [75] and craving [30] has led to an enriched emphasis on mindful savoring practice in the MORE intervention.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garland, E. L., Howard, M. O., Zubieta, J.-K., & Froeliger, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2017
Volume
86
Issue
2
Pages
111-112
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
OpenAlex
W2588752240
Cited by
50
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Fahs-Beck Fund for Research and Experimentation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R03DA032517, R01DA042033, R34DA037005)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R61AT009296)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
chronic pain, prescription opioid misuse, Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement, drug cue reactivity, natural reward, opioid use disorder
MeSH terms
Adult, Analgesics, Opioid, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Opioid-Related Disorders, Reward, Treatment Outcome, Chronic Pain, Prescription Drug Misuse, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review