The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple Wearable Sensors in Parkinson and Huntington Disease Individuals: A Pilot Study in Clinic and at Home
Open accessAbstract
Background: Clinician rating scales and patient-reported outcomes are the principal means of assessing motor symptoms in Parkinson disease and Huntington disease. However, these assessments are subjective and generally limited to episodic in-person visits. Wearable sensors can objectively and continuously measure motor features and could be valuable in clinical research and care. Methods: We recruited participants with Parkinson disease, Huntington disease, and prodromal Huntington disease (individuals who carry the genetic marker but do not yet exhibit symptoms of the disease), and controls to wear 5 accelerometer-based sensors on their chest and limbs for standardized in-clinic assessments and for 2 days at home. The study’s aims were to assess the feasibility of use of wearable sensors, to determine the activity (lying, sitting, standing, walking) of participants, and to survey participants on their experience. Results: Fifty-six individuals (16 with Parkinson disease, 15 with Huntington disease, 5 with prodromal Huntington disease, and 20 controls) were enrolled in the study. Data were successfully obtained from 99.3% (278/280) of sensors dispatched. On average, individuals with Huntington disease spent over 50% of the total time lying down, substantially more than individuals with prodromal Huntington disease (33%, p = 0.003), Parkinson disease (38%, p = 0.01), and controls (34%; p < 0.001). Most (86%) participants were “willing” or “very willing” to wear the sensors again. Conclusions: Among individuals with movement disorders, the use of wearable sensors in clinic and at home was feasible and well-received. These sensors can identify statistically significant differences in activity profiles between individuals with movement disorders and those without. In addition, continuous, objective monitoring can reveal disease characteristics not observed in clinic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment
Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x · Cited by 25,553
The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons
Podsiadlo, D., & Richardson, S. (1991) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x · Cited by 14,418
Technology in Parkinson’s disease: challenges and opportunities
Espay, A. J., Bonato, P., Nahab, F. B., Maetzler, W., Dean, J. M., Klucken, J., Eskofier, B. M., Merola, A., Horak, F., Lang, A. E., et al. (2016) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.26642 · Cited by 654
Self-citationMannini, A., Trojaniello, D., Cereatti, A., & Sabatini, A. (2016) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s16010134 · Cited by 242
Novel Methods and Technologies for 21st-Century Clinical Trials: A Review
Dorsey, E. R., Venuto, C., Venkataraman, V., Harris, D. A., & Kieburtz, K. (2015) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4524 · Cited by 118
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.01.010 · DOI
- 10.1002/mds.25628 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70245-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/mds.22340 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/mds.870110204 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.11.033 · DOI
- 10.1002/1531-8249(200001)47:1<64::AID-ANA11>3.3.CO;2-J · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jns.2016.03.021 · DOI
- 10.2217/nmt.15.45 · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.24495 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.01.009 · DOI
- 10.2522/ptj.20140374 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.05.014 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00415-011-6097-7 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: mechanism and potential therapeutic targets
Gao, C., Jiang, J., Tan, Y., & Chen, S. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01588-0 · Cited by 1,616
Seppi, K., Weintraub, D., Coelho, M., Perez‐Lloret, S., Fox, S. H., Katzenschlager, R., Hametner, E., Poewe, W., Rascol, O., Goetz, C. G., et al. (2011) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.23884 · Cited by 1,141
Advances in therapeutic applications of extracellular vesicles
Wiklander, O. P. B., Brennan, M. Á., Lötvall, J., Breakefield, X. O., & EL Andaloussi, S. (2019) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aav8521 · Cited by 1,039
Oxidative Stress in Neurodegenerative Diseases: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Applications
Liu, Z., Zhou, T., Ziegler, A. C., Dimitrion, P., & Zuo, L. (2017) · Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity · doi:10.1155/2017/2525967 · Cited by 810
Luen Tang, B. (2016) · Molecules and Cells · doi:10.14348/molcells.2016.2318 · Cited by 740
Metadata
- Authors
- Adams, J. L., Dinesh, K., Xiong, M., Tarolli, C. G., Sharma, S., Sheth, N., Aranyosi, A. J., Zhu, W., Goldenthal, S., Biglan, K. M., Dorsey, E. R., & Sharma, G.
- Venue
- Digital Biomarkers
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2017-08-17
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-63
- ISSN
- 2504-110X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2749718288
- Cited by
- 3,171
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 98.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- Licence
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (vor)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.