Cited by 86Mental Health Research TopicsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsEducational and Psychological Assessments

Translating person-specific network models into personalized treatments: Development and demonstration of the dynamic assessment treatment algorithm for individual networks (DATA-IN)

Rubel, Julian A., Fisher, Aaron J., Husen, Kristin, Lutz, Wolfgang·2018·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000487769

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The identification of which active elements work for whom could improve outcomes via development of personalized treatment protocols, where individuals receive a specific suite of active elements suited to their needs.

    “The identification of which active elements work for whom could improve outcomes via develop­ ment of personalized treatment protocols, where individuals receive a specific suite of active elements suited to their needs (Fisher et al., 2019; Rubel, Fisher, Husen, & Lutz, 2018).”

    From Measuring the active elements of cognitive-behavioral therapies (2023) · cites this paper as Rubel, Fisher, Husen, & Lutz, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rubel, J. A., Fisher, A. J., Husen, K., & Lutz, W.
Affiliations
  • Universität Trier (DE)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2018
Volume
87
Issue
4
Pages
249-251
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
OpenAlex
W2801604488
Cited by
86
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1
FWCI
11.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
Keywords
network models, personalized treatment, treatment algorithm, psychotherapy
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Humans, Psychotherapy, Models, Statistical, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review