Cited by 448Mental Health Research TopicsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Personalized Network Modeling in Psychopathology: The Importance of Contemporaneous and Temporal Connections

Open access
Epskamp, Sacha, van Borkulo, Claudia D., van der Veen, Date C., Servaas, Michelle N., Isvoranu, Adela-Maria, Riese, Harriëtte, Cramer, Angélique O. J.·2018·Clinical Psychological Science

Abstract

Recent literature has introduced (a) the network perspective to psychology and (b) collection of time series data to capture symptom fluctuations and other time varying factors in daily life. Combining these trends allows for the estimation of intraindividual network structures. We argue that these networks can be directly applied in clinical research and practice as hypothesis generating structures. Two networks can be computed: a temporal network, in which one investigates if symptoms (or other relevant variables) predict one another over time, and a contemporaneous network, in which one investigates if symptoms predict one another in the same window of measurement. The contemporaneous network is a partial correlation network, which is emerging in the analysis of cross-sectional data but is not yet utilized in the analysis of time series data. We explain the importance of partial correlation networks and exemplify the network structures on time series data of a psychiatric patient.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2167702617744325

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Epskamp S. Waldorp L. J. Mõttus R. Borsboom D. (2017). Discovering psychological dynamics: The Gaussian graphical model. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04156 · arXiv
  2. Newman M. (2010). Networks: An introduction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  3. O’Hagan A. Forster J. J. (2004). Kendall’s advanced theory of statistics, volume 2B: Bayesian inference (2nd ed.). London, England: Arnold.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Epskamp, S., van Borkulo, C. D., van der Veen, D. C., Servaas, M. N., Isvoranu, A.-M., Riese, H., & Cramer, A. O. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam
  • Department of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center for Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Epskamp, Sacha
Venue
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2018-01-19
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
416-427
ISSN
  • 2167-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-7034
OpenAlex
W2768795110
Cited by
448
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
49.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychological Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
network modeling, psychopathology, dynamic networks, partial correlation networks, time series, symptom fluctuation, hypothesis generation, psychiatric patients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review